• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.39
• /
• pp.69-101
• /
• 2007

Some clauses of the prior review rules for broadcasting commercials, which are enforced by the Broadcasting Act violate the right to free speech guaranteed by the Constitution. The range of prohibited expression under the clauses are too vague and overbroad to distinguish between permissible and impermissible broadcasting commercials. The clauses also fail to pass the constitutional principle that restrict government from excessive regulation on constitutional rights. The principle has a four-pronged test on the government action; 1) the validity of its goal; 2) availability of appropriate means; 3) necessity of infringement; 4) and balancing test of interests. Some clauses of the prior review rules that forbid expressions on sensitive political and cultural issues fail to pass none of the four-pronged standards.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.55
• /
• pp.5-32
• /
• 2011

This paper is a comparative analysis of constitutional decisions in which the Korea Consitutional Court and the United States Supreme Court applied the void for vagueness doctrine into free expression issues. Common aspects are: both courts applied the void for vagueness doctrine on the grounds that vague laws bring chilling effect on freedom of expression. Acknowledging inevitable uncertainties in lawmaking and legal jargons, however, both courts required minimum standards in the void for vagueness doctrine. In the cases where unclear legal meanings resulted in constitutional challenges, both courts adopted the "narrowing construction" by the courts or judges based on average/ordinary person's understanding. The biggest differences between the two constitutional courts are their approach to the degrees of vagueness allowed in free expression cases. The U.S. Supreme Court underscored the necessity of narrowly drawn, reasonable and definite standards. Meanwhile, the Korea Constitutional Court relaxed its standards in some cases such as the National Security Law cases, even though it admitted the possibility of curtailing the right to free expression. The Court reasoned that those laws, though vague, brought with bigger social interests and are necessary tools in dealing with changing world.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.49 no.1
• /
• pp.178-189
• /
• 2016

This essay explores the ways in which the philosophical concept of "original form" is expressed in relevant laws and regulations, the legal character of respective regulations, the way in which each regulation is applied in practice for heritage management, and the factors required for this concept to serve as a legally binding fundamental principle. The current laws and regulations on heritage maintain a consistent requirement for preserving the original form of heritage, both for the general public and for heritage professionals. However, the principle of preserving original form is expressed as a declaration or imperative without substantive definitions. Consequently, heritage administrators simply follow administrative procedures for heritage conservation, management, and promotion while failing to specify the meaning of "original form." For the practical application of the principle of preserving original form to overall heritage conservation activities as an actual legal principle, further provisions should be added for the purpose of clarifying the principle, with consideration given to the observation of fundamental principles for legal provisions, such as the principles of clarity, equality, and proportion. The principle of preserving original form still functions as the most necessary principle for heritage conservation and therefore should be reestablished as a refined and rational regulatory system.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.12 no.7
• /
• pp.156-168
• /
• 2012

As the increase of violent crimes such as robbery, murder, and rape has become a social problem, the government is considering institutionalizing the identification of criminals to prevent crime and to guarantee people's right to know. Such an atmosphere led to the approval of the revision of 'Special Law On the Punishment of Specific violent Crimes' in the National Assembly in April 2010. The revision allows the revelation of the profiles of crime suspects including the pictures of their faces at the investigation stage. However, whether the revision had been effective in preventing crime has not been demonstrated empirically. Moreover, identity revelation is a grave intrusion into privacy and an abuse of human rights such as personal rights and the right to a fair trial, since personal information of criminal suspects would be released to the media prior to the court's final judgements. Also it violates the principle of presumption of innocence, the principles of due process, the principle of double jeopardy, the principle of prohibition against excessive, the principles of clarity, and the principle of liability.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.79-84
• /
• 2013

The definition and classification of shunting, which involves the process of sorting rolling stock into complete train sets inside station yard, are not clearly specified in Korean domestic safety regulations for railway operations. As a result, collisions during shunting occur rather frequently compared with other types of accidents in railway operations. Therefore, new systematic safety principles are proposed in this paper to improve operation safety during shunting. The improvements in safety and efficiency derived from the newly proposed approach are analyzed and verified in field application.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.169-190
• /
• 2009

In order to establish whether any charterparty terms are incorporated into the bill of lading, the first necessity is to specify the charterparty alluded to the incorporation clause in the bill of lading. However, this becomes a potential problem where the date of a charterparty is not inserted on the face of the bill of lading in case a vessel is in operation under a number of charterparties. Over many years this issue has frequently been raised before the English courts, but it is still causing problems. The purpose of this study is to examines the several English authorities which dealt with the issue relating to the specification of charterparty incorporated into the bill of lading and to present some interpretation rules and the order of priority. As a result, the comparative analysis of English authorities shows that they failed to give dear guidance on this issue. This article therefore suggests four interpretation rules such as the precedence of a B/L's face, the rule of appositeness, surrounding circumstances, the contra proferentem rule and shows that the precedence of a B/L's face is most applicable for all parties.

• Journal of the korean veterinary medical association
• /
• v.43 no.9
• /
• pp.825-832
• /
• 2007

모든 부정맥이 치료를 필요로 하는 것은 아니지만, 다양한 부정맥들이 허약 (weakness), 실신 (syncope)을 유발하거나 울혈성 심부전을 악화시키며 일부의 부정맥들은 치명적인 심장 이상을 일으킨다. 일반적으로 임상증상을 유발하는 부정맥들과 급사의 지표가 될 수 있는 부정맥들은 치료한다. 불행하게도, 수의학 분야의 심장전문의들 사이에서 어떤 부정맥들을 치료해야만 하고 어떻게 관리하는 것이 최선인가에 관한 내용이 명확하게 일치하고 있지는 않다. 사실은 어떤 항부정맥 약물을 우선적으로 선택해야 하는가에 관해서 명확한 합의점이 없을 뿐만 아니라 어떤 범주의 약물이 효과적인가에 대해서도 논란의 여자기 있다. 예를 들어, 심각한 심실성 부정맥이 성공적으로 치료되지 않으면 현저한 이소성 박동(ectopy)이 지속적으로 남을 수도 있다. 또한 만일 임상증상들 (실신 등)이 해소되고 지속적인 심실성 부정맥이 잘 통제된 이러한 류의 질문들에 대한 대답은 대부분 명확하지 않고 신중하게 숙고한 의견에 불과할 수도 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2023.07a
• /
• pp.133-135
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 호황을 누리고 있는 e스포츠 방송 분야에서 그래픽 디자인의 중요성을 탐구한다. e스포츠 시청자에게 명확하고 매력적인 비주얼을 제공하고 선수 통계, 팀 순위, 토너먼트 일정과 같은 정보를 제공하는 효과적인 그래픽 디자인의 중요성을 강조한다. 시각적으로 매력적이고 몰입감 있는 방송을 만드는 데 도움이 되는 핵심 원칙과 전략을 식별하는 것을 제안하고 있으며, 그래픽에 대한 시청자 반응을 측정하고 문제가 될 수 있는 그래픽이 전반적인 e스포츠 경험을 방해하는지 확인하기 위해 설문 조사를 통해 분석 결과를 제시한다. 그리고 디자이너가 고려해야 할 핵심 사항에는 명확성, 일관성, 브랜딩 및 혁신이 포함되며, 이 모든 요소는 청중을 참여시키고 e스포츠 방송의 품질을 높이는 효과적인 그래픽을 만드는 데 도움이 될 수 있는 내용들을 제시한다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2022.05a
• /
• pp.377-377
• /
• 2022

수리권은 물을 소유할 수 있는 권리가 아닌 지속적이고 배타적으로 물을 사용할 수 있는 권리를 의미한다. 국내 수리권은 공유하천용수권, 관행수리권, 허가수리권, 댐사용권 및 농어촌용수 수리권으로 구분되어 있다. 미국의 경우 연안주의 수리권 (Riparian Rights), 유용한 사용의 원칙 (Beneficial Use Doctorin)에 근거한 우선전용 수리권 (Prior Appropriation Rights)으로 구분되어 있으며 물 분쟁이 발생할 경우 동등배분원칙에 따라 해결방안을 제시하고 있다. 일본 수리권의 경우 댐 건설할 경우 건설 주체 및 비용 분담이 명확하게 규정되어 있어 별도의 수리권 규정 절차가 없으며 농업용수에 대한 관행수리권 또는 기득수리권이 존재할뿐 그 외의 생활용수 등에 대한 수리권은 존재하지 않는다. 이렇듯 본 연구에서 검토된 국내외 수리권 법률 및 해결 방안에 대한 비교 및 검토 결과는 향후 국내의 수리권 법률 규정에 기초 자료로 활용 될 수 있을 것이다.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.65-92
• /
• 2011

Die soeben entwickelten Grundgs$\ddot{a}$tze k$\ddot{o}$nnen dazu f$\ddot{u}$hren, dass es bei Fluggesellschaften zum Abschluss mehrerer Tarifvertr$\ddot{a}$ge $\ddot{u}$ber Personalvertretungen durch verschidene Gewerkschften kommt. Dies leitet schlie${\ss}$lich zu der bereits angesprochenen Problematik der Tarifkonkurrenz $\ddot{u}$ber. Tarifkonkurrenz zeichnet sich bekanntlich dadurch aus, dass f$\ddot{u}$r dasselbe Rechtsverh$\ddot{a}$ltnis dieselbe Regelungsmaterie durch mehr als einen Tarifvertrag geregelt wird. Eine solche Tarifkonkurenz kann unabh$\ddot{a}$ngig von der Frage, ob Regelungsgegenstand betriebsverfassungsrechtlicher Normen ein betriebliches Rechtsverh$\ddot{a}$ltnis ist, auch bei dieser Art von Tarifnormen auftreten. Dabei betriebsverfassungsrechtlichen Kollektivnormen gem$\ddot{a}{\ss}$ $\S$3 Abs. 2 TVG die Tarifbindung des Arbeitgebers f$\ddot{u}$r die Anwendungsbarkeit gen$\ddot{u}$gt, wird beim Vorhandensein mehrerer solcher Tarifvertr$\ddot{a}$ge h$\ddot{a}$ufig pauschal von einer in jedem Fall aufzul$\ddot{o}$senden tarifkonkurrenz gesprochen. $\ddot{U}$berschneiden sich die Geltungsbereiche mehrerer Tarifvertr$\ddot{a}$ge $\ddot{u}$ber personalvertretungsrechtliche Fragen der im Luftbetrieb t$\ddot{a}$tigen Besch$\ddot{a}$ftigten und handelt es sich nicht um textidentische Regelungen, f$\ddot{u}$hrt indes kein Weg daran vorbei, dass eine Tarifkonkurenz besteht, die einer Aufl$\ddot{o}$sung bedarf. Die Rechtsprechung hat sich zur speziellen Fragen der Aufl$\ddot{o}$sung einer Konkurrenz betriebsverfassungsrechtlicher Tarifnormen soweit ersichtlich noch nicht ge$\ddot{a}$u${\ss}$ert. Nicht zuletzt aus diesem Grund wird in der Literatur ein buntes Spektrum an L$\ddot{o}$sungen pr$\ddot{a}$sentiert, wobei sich die meisten neueren Stellungnahmen vor allem mit Organisationstarifvertr$\ddot{a}$gen im Sinne von ${\S}$3 BetrVG besch$\ddot{a}$ftigen.