• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Energy Engineering kosee Conference
• /
• 1996.10b
• /
• pp.69-74
• /
• 1996

본 연구에서는 DSM 프로그램 개발에 있어 가장 일반적인 수행수단으로 활용되고 있는 리베이트의 적정수준 결정을 위한 방법과 절차를 제시하였다. DSM 기술의 비용효과 분석에 있어서는 전력회사의 회피비용과 기술비용을 각각 편익과 비용지표로 산정하였으며, 이를 토대로 RIM 및 TRC 지표에 의해 상이한 리베이트 수준에서의 시뮬레이션을 반복적으로 시행하였다. 적용 대상 프로그램으로는 현재 국내에서 시행되고 있는 고효율 조명프로그램의 전자식 안정기를 택하였다.

• 방재와보험
• /
• s.32
• /
• pp.18-19
• /
• 1987

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.3-36
• /
• 2022

In order to solve the pharmaceutical kickback problem, it is needed to establish legal system that allow ways to enable pharmaceutical promotion of medicines without kickbacks as well as provide sanction those who commit illegal act. Before the National Assembly and the government focused on strengthening sanctions. As a result, in 2014, a system of suspending medical care benefits was introduced, which could inflict heavy losses on pharmaceutical companies by withdrawing target medicines from the market. However, three years after the introduction, the system was abolished in 2018, recognizing the problem that the disposition could infringe on the patients' right to access to and choice of medicines. In 2021, the National Assembly made it possible for dispositions suspending medical care benefits regarding the third violation, which remained symbolic until then, replaced with administrative fines. Although the legislator's reflective stance on the system is more than clear, the Ministry of Health and Welfare still interprets that the old law should be applied to kickbacks for the period of the law. Moreover, regarding the substitution of fines at the discretion of the Minister of Health and Welfare under the old law, the narrow standards taken under the old law seems to be maintained. In this paper, firstly pharmaceutical kickback issue, the main reason for the introduction of the system, will be explained, after that the history of introduction and abolition of the system examined and last but not least the unconstitutionality of the system and the illegality of the disposition are to be examined.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.145
• /
• pp.22-35
• /
• 2009

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.139
• /
• pp.30-41
• /
• 2008

• The Magazine for Energy Service Companies
• /
• s.37
• /
• pp.40-43
• /
• 2005

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.126
• /
• pp.79-83
• /
• 2006

• Journal of Energy Engineering
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.118-123
• /
• 2003

Motor-driven systems are the largest electrical load and share about 40％ of electric energy consumption in Korea. Increasing the efficiency of drive-power systems, therefore, is one of the most urgent demand side programs to be designed and launched. This paper presents an extensive analysis on the alternative rebate programs viable to enhancing the adoption of high-efficiency induction motors, and suggests government activities supporting market transformation initiatives.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.310-328
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to contribute to reducing distribution costs, enhancing export price competitiveness, and improving distribution system in LCL cargo, by pursuing the present status of warehouse storage fee, a cause & problem about excessive hike, and a plan for stabilizing warehouse storage fee, as for LCL Cargo, which is imported by sea. The plans for rationalizing warehouse storage fee in LCL cargo were suggested the adoption of the ceiling system for warehouse storage fee rate, the obligation of offering information on warehouse storage fee rate, the eradication of illegal rebate, the improvement in distribution system of the imported LCL cargo, a scheme for the importer to designate a bonded warehouse and forwarder, the introduction of the tentatively named 'LORAS(Lowest Rate Service),' and formation of the dispute coordinating committee for warehouse storage fee.

• Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.210-212
• /
• 2006

This paper presents a theoretical framework for discussing the role of rebates in successful market transformation programs. Rebates can play an important role in market transformation, essentially acting as a catalyst to jump-start markets and overcome initial barriers. However, they also have drawbacks that can actually inhibit market transformation. In particular, they can interfere with market signals between customers and manufactures, so that markets respond sluggishly. This can delay the broad-based acceptance of new products.