• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.105-114
• /
• 2007

As a result of imminent recognition on nature from modern world, the need for the combination between architecture and nature has been raised as another topic in architectural arena, and this kind of work is being conducted under the notion of Landscape. As the term 'Landscape' emerges as the key word in contemporary architecture, 'Landscape' begins to transcend the mere meaning of landscape architecture(gardening). The word, Landscape, has gone beyond the meaning of mere landscape, or rural vista one-dimensionally, and, after having introduced the attributes of nature into building activities, has emerged as a notion trying to form 'the architecture as landscape.' Together with these, 'Landscape' is expanding as a notion having various layers. The notion's, 'Landscape', occupying the significant position in contemporary architecture has been a recent phenomenon over 1980-1990s, and its category of practice has not certain limitation, rather it has started simultaneously from various areas. This study, before reviewing the architectural notion of Landscape by studying the Landscape notion and its various embodying methods being shown in contemporary architecture. As a result of examining the features of Landscape notion shown in various directions(ways), being influenced by the four Landscape types presented by Eduard Bru and the currents of the times, we can see that, though the features are somewhat similar, they are classified and explained as different types respectively. So, we are able to recategorize the features into 6 domains in this study.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.32-41
• /
• 2008

It has been a recent phenomenon over 1980-1990s that the notion of Landscape has had significant position in contemporary architecture. And the execution range isn't limited to a certain area but is extended to various areas. Under such influence of trend of the times, various architectural attempts in which landscape notion is applied have been tried by the group of architects of our country which are mainly composed of young architects. This study aims to derive the features of landscape appearing in our contemporary architecture by analyzing how Landscape notion is embodied in our Landscape architecture which are claiming the expression of Landscape notion as nature, human beings and view. The purpose of the study is to suggest the limitation and the direction to go through of Korean Landscape architecture through the analysis of such features. Through the recategorization of the Landscape notion, this study reviews the features in detail shown in buildings in Heyily Art Valley which were built strongly based on the expression of the Landscape notion, the art works in Paju City of Publishing Industry and other Landscape buildings. The findings of the review show that Landscape architectural notion has been attempted not only in a certain facilities but also in various genres of architecture. And also it shows that the expression of Landscape notion is performed not by various ways but by only limited ones which are preferred.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 2007

This study examines the nature-introducing methods between Korea Traditional Architecture and Landscape Architecture dividing them into three; semantic methods, constructive methods and visual methods on the basis of architectural features deduced from Borrowed Landscape theory which is a typical nature-introducing theory in the orient. Through the findings of this study, we can explain the nature-introducing methods of Landscape Architecture by way of the method of the Borrowed Landscape which was frequently used by our ancestors for a long time to Introduce nature in the course of building structures, and we can find several similarities between the Architecture of two fields of both different times and areas. It can be said to be meaningful for us to be able to confirm the contemporary value of Traditional nature-introducing method through the Borrowed Landscape theory. However, we can find that there is a difference between Traditional Architecture and Landscape Architecture in looking at nature. If the Landscape Architecture which emerged recently as a result of recognizing the importance of nature, maintains the nature view of regarding nature and architecture as equal, the nature view of Traditional Architecture is essentially different in that it is humble and aims to return to nature. The most outstanding feature of nature-introducing way in Traditional Architecture obviously implies something different from the various architectural trends of 'nature-human', or 'nature-architecture' which appeared breaking the relation of dichotomy. It is the thinking that 'nature and human are continual', and 'human is part of nature'; that is, 'the humbleness to nature'.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권5호
• /
• pp.129-138
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze and evaluate the significance of undulated planes of architectural landscape methodology, to assess if the methodology had potential to be a sustainable architectural model, to be experimented in future. To achieve this purpose, the historical origins and changes of the landscape is discussed to analyse how it influenced modern architecture. Then the effects of panoramic sensibility derived from the picturesque garden is analysed to evaluate the influence it had on the change of the perception of space and modern architecture and landscape design strategy. Then 1980s and 1990s' symposiums and landscape theories are examined. To find pivotal moment of merging landscape and architecture, the design schemes of Bernard Tchumi and OMA for La Villette competition are selected as manifestations to show co-existence of landscape and architecture. Afterwards Yokohama ferry terminal is analyzed to present the undulated planes deployed for the union of landscape and architecture, to the affect of uninterrupted spatial connectivity. The impact of undulated plane on interior is explored in analysis of Rolex Learning Center, consequently changing the relationship within functions of the interior and the role of circulation. Finally, the spatial characteristics and significance of undulated plane is explored. The spatial characteristics are, the relationship beyond the visual connection through seamless connection; the multiple access paths and discard of transition space thereby diminishing boundaries; the environmentalization of architecture by spatializing circulation and promoting in-hierarchy. The significance of undulated planes are, the synthesis form of architectural typology; the cultivation of public sense; the closest spatial type to the space of appearance referred to by Hannah Arendt.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.117-126
• /
• 2006

Although we have seen recently increasing number of eco-villages, any eco-village is not registered in Global Eco-village Network. It is important to review the definition of eco-villages and to provide useful basic information for future eco-villages. The main research aim is to analyze landscape characteristics of community garden and common spaces and to identify ecological symbolism of landscape created by residents in eco-villages. Seven eco-villages in Germany, Denmark and UK were selected and the following aspects were investigated through field survey; the settlement background, social and economical aspect, architectural specifications, recycled energy, and landscape characteristics of external spaces in eco-villages. The result indicated that the landscape of eco-village did intend neither to return to primitive society nor to control nature by technology. It intended to coexistence with nature. Primitive nature is symbolically restored and people who have it in mind strongly intend to grow together this common sense. Landscape creation has important role in creating common relationship between human living and nature. When we regard it conceptually as the eco-symbolism in landscape design of community garden, it presented the meaningful relationship with landscape and human life. It is not expression of landscape materiality and designed form but sense of place and landscape image. Landscape design would be expected to reveal the life stage and cycle from designed physical form and materiality through as time goes by when it is part of environmental circulation process by means of human living as meaningful relationship.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.86-93
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to find out how the otherness philosophy reveals itself in the principle of F.O.A construction space creation. The traditional philosophy of totality is self-centered and thoughts are based on the subject. It couldn't escape from the world associated with the self, and has subordinated the other to the main body. But the philosophy of otherness transcends the subject, to the open, creative way of thinking which acknowledges deconstruction, decentralization, and non-hierarchy. This is very similar to contemporary architecture, which pursuits change, and also to the current state of society. In construction by the construction group F.O.A, which is doing notable activity this generation, there is an attempt to transcend the fixed subject which is seen in the otherness discussion, and realize recategorization by overcoming the boundaries of subject and object. First, by the realization of landscape architecture using a topographical folding technique, boundaries of the subject and object are demolished in the relationship of the landscape construction, and recategorization. Second, by breaking up the meaning of the surface which is a visual and physical boundary for both the internal and external, recategorization is being done. Third, by making the boundary between the interior and exterior indistinct, cognitive threshold is dissolved, and the relationship between the subject and object is being recategorization. In conclusion, we can see that the many recategorization phenomenons that are happening in the F.O.A construction show the otherness that escapes from the conventional and stationary relationship, and recognizes each other at the same time, forming new relationships.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.14-25
• /
• 2009

지식 패러다임의 변화와 함께 우리는 혼합의 시대에 살고 있다. 현대 조경에서 다루는 새로운 대상지들은 혼합의 양상을 실천하는 장이 되고 있으며, 조경 영역의 변화를 이끄는 주요 동인이 되고 있기도 하다. 이러한 배경 아래 본 연구는 환경설계에 있어 관련 분야 통합의 양상이 어떻게 나타나는지를 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 먼저 조경 인접 분야에서의 통합 논의의 경향을 계획 이론, 도시 이론, 건축 분야, 공공 환경 분야, 엔지니어링 분야 그리고 조경 이론으로 나누어 살펴보았다. 실천으로 나타나고 있는 분야별 통합의 논의 경향은 아직까지 각 분야를 중심으로 인접 분야의 장점을 효과적으로 활용하고자 하는 방향에서 진행되고 있다. 실천 사례로 볼 때, 통합적 설계의 접근 경향은 크게 설계 대상, 개별 전문 분야, 접근 방식 및 설계 방법론의 세가지 차원에서 발견할 수 있다. 설계의 대상 측면에서는 주로 설계를 통해 형성되는 각 물리적 대상간의 통합 또는 결합의 모습을 주로 볼 수 있다. 대부분의 통합 사례가 여기에서 발견되며, 거의 모두 소재나 표현의 대상이 몇 가지의 방법으로 통합되는 모습이다. 전문 분야의 측면에서는 각 개별 주체들이 설계 시 어떻게 활동하는지가 주로 나타난다. 여기에서는 개별 분야의 장점이 시너지를 이루면서 최적의 결과를 향해 통합되는 양상을 보인다. 접근 방식 및 설계 방법론의 측면에서는 효과적인 의사결정의 방법으로서 통합적 접근이 시도되고 있는데, 이때에는 개별 이해 당사자들의 통합이 주가 된다. 통합 설계는 아직까지 실천적 사례를 통해 구체적인 디자인 방법론으로 강조되는 경우는 많지 않았다. 그러나 통합설계의 필요성과 이론적 접근이 다방면에서 확인되었고, 랜드스케이프 어바니즘과 같은 실천적 움직임이 태동하여 활동하고 있다는 점은 고무적이라고 하겠다. 이러한 종합적 접근을 바탕으로 통합의 실천이 환경설계의 측면에서 논의되어야 할 시점이다.