• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.609-621
• /
• 2005

1. 목적 Osteotome 상악동거상술(Bone Added Odteotome Sinus Floor Elevation ; 이하 BAOSFE) 과 동시에 식립한 임프란트($Br{\aa}nemark$, ITI)의 예상 생존율에 대해 현재까지 정확히 알려진 바는 없었으며, $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite 과 ITI SLA 임프란트의 표면에 대한 비교 연구 또한없었다. 이번 연구는 BAOSFE 술식과 동시에 식립한 $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite 과 ITI SLA 임프란트의 임상 결과를 비교, 평가하고 초기 치유기간 동안의 이식골 높이의 변화를 방사선학적으로 관찰하여 두 가지 임프란트 시스템을 비교해 보고자 한다. 2. 방법 위축된 상악 구치부를 갖는 22명의 환자를 대상으로, BAOSFE술식과동시에 $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite(11명, 13 임프란트)임프란트와 ITI SLA(11명, 18 임프란트)임프란트를 식립하였다. 수술 전, 임프란트 식립 직후, 술후 6개월의 파노라마 방사선 사진을 촬영하여 비교 및 평가에 사용하였다. 각 임프란트 시스템의 생존율을 측정하고, 술전 상악동저 높이와 식립된 임프란트 길이를 참고하여 이식골 높이의 방사선학적 변화를 평가하였다. 3. 결과 평균12개월의 추적기간 결과, $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite 임프란트의 생존율은 100%(13/13 임프란트)이었으며, ITI SLA 임프란트의 생존율은 94.4%(17/18 임프란트)이었다. 초기 치유 기간인 6개월 동안 평균 이식골 높이의 감소는 $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite 임프란트에서 0.67mm(10.73%), ITI SLA 임프란트에서는 0.55mm(8.18%)로 나타났다. 두 가지 임프란트 시스템 간의 유의성 있는 차이는 보이지 않았다. 4. 고찰 BAOSFE 술식과 동시식립한 $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite 과 ITl SLA 임프란트는 위축된 상악 구치부를 갖는 환자에서 효과적인 치료방법이 될 수 있으며, 임프란트 표면에 따른 이식골의 치유 반응은 두 가지 임프란트 시스템에서 유사한 양상으로 일어남을 알 수 있었다.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.54 no.2
• /
• pp.103-109
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study is to evaluate the clinical significance of implantation with simultaneous bone graft by comparing the marginal bone loss around maxillary anterior implants with or without bone graft. Materials and methods: Patients treated with implant-retained restorations on maxillary anterior region at Implant Center, Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University between June 2011 and May 2014 were included in this study. Date of implant placement, implant diameter, implant length, implant-abutment connection type and whether the bone graft was done were investigated. The patient's periapical radiographs taken immediately after implantation and at the most recent visit were compared. Marginal bone loss was measured using Emago advanced v5.6 program (Oral diagnostic systems, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Statistical analysis was done in independent t-test by using SPSS 22.0 program. Results: As a result of observing on 83 implants (without bone graft: 44, with bone graft: 39) of 52 patients for 6 - 45 months (average: 18.4 months), implants without bone graft showed $1.42{\pm}0.42mm$, implants with bone graft showed $1.28{\pm}0.45mm$ of marginal bone loss. Conclusion: In limitations of this study, implants with simultaneous bone graft had significantly less marginal bone loss than implants without bone graft.

• Korean Journal of Cleft Lip And Palate
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.117-122
• /
• 2002

성장기 환자에서의 각 부위별 임플란트 식려 시기를 요약해보면 다음과 같다. 1) 상악전방부 : 외상이나 선천적 결손을 해결하는 방법으로 임플란트를 사용하는 술식이 권장하지만 성장이 완료되지 않았기 때문에 야기되는 문제를 해결하기 위해 성장이 완료될 때까지 연기하는 것이 좋다. 2)상악 후방부: 수직적인 성장량이 최고 1cm까지 일어날 수 있으면 상악동의 흡수로 조기에 임플란트 침강과 치근부의 노출을 야기할 수 있다. 그리고 동시에 보철에 의한 구개열의 횡적인 성장방해를 피해야한다. 3) 하악 전방부 : 무치증 아이에서 임플란트의 조기식립이 적응증이 되는 유일한 곳으로 치아가 없을 때는 치조골의 성장이 최소이며 초기에 횡적, 후방 성장이 대부분 완료된다. 그러나 단일 임플란트 식립은 권장되지 않는다. 4)하악후방부: 늦게까지 성장변화가 지속되기 때문에 전후방, 횡적, 수직적 성장의 많은 양이 일어난다. 하악의 회전성장의 영향을 많이 받아 하악 무치악에서 조기 임플란트 사용한 보고도 적고. 자연치아에 인접하여 임플란트를 식립한 기록은 있으나 골격성장이 완료될 때 까지는 식립하지 않는 것이 좋다.

• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.23-36
• /
• 2013

To evaluate the 3-dimensional features of the grafted bone with maxillary sinus augmentation and to assess the relation between the degree of bone resorption and the type of bone grafting source and implant, and the operation method. A retrospective chart review of patients receiving sinus augmentation procedures for implant positioning was conducted: radiographic analysis of the volume and area of bone grafts was performed. The volumetric remodeling.measured at 6 months after implant positioning as the percentage of residual bone graft.was correlated to type of graft materials and operation methods. 53 dental implants positioned with sinus bone graft in 15 patients at Wonkwang University Sanbon Dental Hospital. Computed tomography scans,taken implant positioning after 6 months, showed greater resorption values for the group of $Puros^{(R)}$ graft alone from the group of mixed with $Puros^{(R)}$ and various bone graft (P<0.05, respectively). And resorption values according to operation methods have statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Volume change ratio of bone graft showed greater values for the group of delayed implant position from the group of simultaneously implant placement with bone graft. Retrospective data analysis shows that the method of graft with $Puros^{(R)}$ alone may occur greater resorption of graft materials than mixed graft material with $Puros^{(R)}$ and other graft materials. The group of simultaneously implant placement with bone graft also display smaller resorption ratio of bone graft than the group of delayed implant placement.

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.64-73
• /
• 2019

Various techniques have been developed, and the development of piezo electric devices have made it possible to widen the alveolar ridge even if the residual bone is dense or if there is a lack of cancellous bone between the cortical bones. In the operation of the mandibular posterior area, the flap is easily accessible to the ramus bone, from which high quality autogenous bone can be obtained, compared to other parts. A small autologous bone block can be used with particulated bone graft material using one screw for bone regeneration instead of a large autologous bone with two screws. The tapered implant design can minimize buccal bone fracture, even in severely atrophic mandibular areas. We report a case of 4 years following implant placement with ridge splitting and small autogenous bone graft in severly atrophic mandible. This report demonstrates a case of functional and aesthetic restoration in a patient through a collaboration.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.50 no.3
• /
• pp.191-197
• /
• 2012

Esthetics is important in restoring maxillary anterior area. Alveolar bone resorption and loss of interdental papilla may be minimized by immediate implantation. Previous studies showed successful results with the immediate implantation in healthy extraction socket, while many of these studies objected the immediate implantation into extraction sites with periapical lesions. Recent studies, however, reported successful results of the immediate implantation into extraction sites with periapical lesions with careful debridement of extraction sockets and general medication of antibiotics prior to implantation. A 73-year-old female visited the department of Prosthodontics in ${\bigcirc}{\bigcirc}$ University Dental Hospital with the chief complaint of fallen post-core and crown on left maxillary incisor. Although the incisor was with vertical root fracture and periapical lesion, the immediate implantation following the extraction of tooth was planned. Thorough socket debridement, irrigation with chlorhexidine, and tetracycline soaking were followed by immediate implantation. The general medication of antibiotics (Moxicle Tab.$^{(R)}$, 375 mg) was prescribed before and after the surgery. Immediate provisional restoration was delivered two days after the surgery, and the definitive metal-ceramic restoration was placed about six months later after reproducing the emergence profile from the provisional restoration. This case presents satisfying result esthetically and functionally upto two years after the placement of prosthesis with the harmonious gingival line and no loss of marginal bone.

• 대한치주과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.80-80
• /
• 2004

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.333-339
• /
• 2007

Adequate bone quantity is one of the important factor to obtain osseointegration after implantation. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has widely used in implantation for reconstruction of bony defects. Since introducing this procedure, there are many studies about survival rate of implants, changing in surrounding bone volume after function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of resorption according to placement timing and survival rate after function. The subjects were patients who had been operated with GBR from Jun 2003 to Jun 2004 in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. They were divided into simultaneous and delayed placement group. The follow up had been performed at the time of just after GBR, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24-month later and standard periapical radiographs were taken to estimate the bone level at the time. The total average of bone level change in radiographs was 1.94mm(${\pm}0.25$), and 1.92mm(${\pm}0.72$) in simultaneous installation, 2.03mm(${\pm}0.25$) in delayed installation. In this report, the survival rates were 92.2% in simulataneous group and 92.3% in delayed group. Insufficient primary stability, early contamination of wound, overloading, poor oral hygiene, and infection were thought to be associated factors in the failed cases.

• The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
• /
• v.47 no.2
• /
• pp.240-246
• /
• 2009

Statement of problem: Insertion of endosseous implants in the atrophic maxilla is often complicated because of lack of supporting bone. Augmentation of the floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone & bone substitute graft has been proven to be a reliable treatment modality, at least in the short term. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors of implant survival rate associated with maxillary sinus lift with grafts. Material and methods: The sinus floor was augmented with bone grafts derived from modified Caldwell-luctechnique(71 subject, 93 sinus, 180 implants), the autogenous bone or autogenous+Bio-oss. Before implant installation the width and height of the alveolar crest were increased in the first stage procedure in 10 patients while in the other 61 patients augmentation and implant installation could be performed simultaneously width and height of the alveolar crest > 4 mm) or delayed installation. Results: In all case bone volume was sufficients for implant insertion. 14 of 180 inserted implants were lost during follow up and the healing period Patient received implant supported overdenture(5 patients) or fixed bridge(62 patients). Conclusion: Within the limit of the result of this study, we conclude that bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus floor with bone for the insertion of implants might be a reliable treatment modality and the autogenous bone graft and delayed installation method might be the factors for good results.

• Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
• /
• v.33 no.1
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 2017

The atrophy of edentulous ridge and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus often limit the volume of bone available for implant placement on maxillary posterior teeth. Most clinicians suffer difficulties from poor bone quality and quantity on maxillary posterior site. Thus, the success of maxillary posterior implant surgery depends on the increase of the available bone and obtaining a good initial stability of the implant after maxillary sinus reconstruction. The maxillary sinus augmentation methods include a crestal approach and a lateral approach. Less morbidity and complications after operation is major advantage to sinus augmentation using crestal approach than lateral approach. However, when the residual ridge height is ${\geq}6mm$, it is known that crestal approach is appropriate. Also delayed implantation after sinus augmentation is recommended in severely atrophic ridge. We present the three cases of implant placement simultaneously sinus augmentation using crestal approach in posterior maxilla site with ${\leq}3mm$ of residual alveolar bone.