Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15522/jkaed.2019.28.2.64

Implant placement in severely atrophic mandible using alveolar ridge splitting procedure and small block bone graft: A case report of 4-year follow-up  

Kim, Na-Hong (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Bang, Joo-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Lee, Dong-Woon (Department of Periodontology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Academy of Esthetic Dentistry / v.28, no.2, 2019 , pp. 64-73 More about this Journal
Abstract
Various techniques have been developed, and the development of piezo electric devices have made it possible to widen the alveolar ridge even if the residual bone is dense or if there is a lack of cancellous bone between the cortical bones. In the operation of the mandibular posterior area, the flap is easily accessible to the ramus bone, from which high quality autogenous bone can be obtained, compared to other parts. A small autologous bone block can be used with particulated bone graft material using one screw for bone regeneration instead of a large autologous bone with two screws. The tapered implant design can minimize buccal bone fracture, even in severely atrophic mandibular areas. We report a case of 4 years following implant placement with ridge splitting and small autogenous bone graft in severly atrophic mandible. This report demonstrates a case of functional and aesthetic restoration in a patient through a collaboration.
Keywords
alveolar ridge splitting procedure; simultaneous placement; block bone graft; collaboration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Barone A, Orlando B, Cingano L, Marconcini S, Derchi G, Covani U. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non‐augmented extraction sockets: 3‐year results. Journal of periodontology. 2012 Jul 1;83(7):836-46.   DOI
2 Misch CE, Suzuki JB. Tooth extraction, socket grafting, and barrier membrane bone regeneration. Contemporary Implant Dentistry, 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby. 2008:870-904.
3 Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2013 Mar 1;17(2):341-63.   DOI
4 Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jawbone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a splitcrest technique and guided tissue regeneration. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1992 Dec 1;12(6).
5 Pikos MA. Block autografts for localized ridge augmentation: Part II. The posterior mandible. Implant dentistry. 2000;9(1):67-75.   DOI
6 Lee DW, Lee JW, Lim HC, Kang KL, Choi SH, Yu JA. Simultaneous Block Bone Grafting Using "L-Shaped Notch" Preparation in Mandible: Case Series and 1-Year Follow-up. Implant dentistry. 2015 Oct 1;24(5):625-30.   DOI
7 Milinkovic I, Cordaro L. Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2014 May 1;43(5):606-25.   DOI
8 Ella B, Laurentjoye M, Sedarat C, Coutant JC, Masson E, Rouas A. Mandibular ridge expansion using a horizontal bone-splitting technique and synthetic bone substitute: an alternative to bone block grafting?. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014 Jan 1;29(1).
9 Vercellotti T. Piezoelectric surgery in implantology: a case report: a new piezoelectric ridge expansion technique. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2000 Aug 1;20(4).
10 Basa S, Varol A, Turker N. Alternative bone expansion technique for immediate placement of implants in the edentulous posterior mandibular ridge: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2004 Jul 1;19(4).
11 Jensen OT, Cullum DR, Baer D. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009 Sep 1;67(9):1921-30.   DOI