DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implant placement simultaneously sinus augmentation using crestal approach in severely atrophic maxilla; minimally invasive approach

골 흡수가 심한 상악 구치부에서 치조정 접근법을 이용하여 상악동 골이식술 동시 임플란트 식립

  • Kim, Hyun-Joo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kwon, Eun-Young (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jeomil (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Joo, Ji-Young (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 김현주 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과) ;
  • 권은영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과) ;
  • 최점일 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과) ;
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과) ;
  • 주지영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과)
  • Received : 2017.01.20
  • Accepted : 2017.02.26
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

The atrophy of edentulous ridge and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus often limit the volume of bone available for implant placement on maxillary posterior teeth. Most clinicians suffer difficulties from poor bone quality and quantity on maxillary posterior site. Thus, the success of maxillary posterior implant surgery depends on the increase of the available bone and obtaining a good initial stability of the implant after maxillary sinus reconstruction. The maxillary sinus augmentation methods include a crestal approach and a lateral approach. Less morbidity and complications after operation is major advantage to sinus augmentation using crestal approach than lateral approach. However, when the residual ridge height is ${\geq}6mm$, it is known that crestal approach is appropriate. Also delayed implantation after sinus augmentation is recommended in severely atrophic ridge. We present the three cases of implant placement simultaneously sinus augmentation using crestal approach in posterior maxilla site with ${\leq}3mm$ of residual alveolar bone.

상악 구치부는 치조제 골 흡수와 상악동 함기화로 인해 가용골의 양은 제한되고 골질도 좋지 않은 경우가 대부분으로 상악동저의 거상 후 가용골의 증대와 취약한 골에서 임플란트의 견고한 초기 고정을 획득하는 것이 중요하다. 심하게 위축된 치조제의 경우 임플란트의 적절한 초기 고정 획득을 위해 측방접근법을 통한 상악동 골이식술이나 지연 임플란트 식립법이 추천되나 본 연구에서는 수직적 잔존골 높이가 3 mm 이하인 상악 구치부 세 증례를 통해 수직 골 소실이 심한 상악 구치부에서 전통적인 개념과는 달리 최소침습적 수술법으로 치조정 접근을 통한 상악동 골이식과 동시에 임플란트 식립을 시행하여 합병증 없이 충분한 길이의 임플란트 식립이 가능함을 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Woo I, Le BT. Maxillary sinus floor elevation: review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent 2004;13:28-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ID.0000116369.66716.12
  2. Block MS. Improvements in the crestal osteotome approach have decreased the need for the lateral window approach to augment the maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:2169-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.008
  3. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;5;CD008397.
  4. Tallarico M, Meloni SM, Xhanari E, Pisano M, Cochran DL. Minimally invasive sinus augmentation procedure using a dedicated hydraulic sinus lift implant device: a prospective case series study on clinical, radiologic, and patient-centered outcomes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2017;37:125-35. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2914
  5. Bruschi GB, Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of 46 patients up to 16 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:759-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00313.x
  6. Pjetursson BE, Ignjatovic D, Matuliene G, Bragger U, Schmidlin K, Lang NP. Transalveolar maxillary sinus floor elevation using osteotomes with or without grafting material. Part II: radiographic tissue remodeling. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:677-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01721.x
  7. Giannini S, Signorini L, Bonanome L, Severino M, Corpaci F, Cielo A. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV): it may occur after dental implantology. A mini topical review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2015;19:3543-7.
  8. Better H, Slavescu D, Barbu H, Cochran DL, Chaushu G. Minimally invasive sinus lift implant device: a multicenter safety and efficacy trial preliminary results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16: 520-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12021
  9. Kher U, Ioannou AL, Kumar T, Siormpas K, Mitsias ME, Mazor Z, Kotsakis GA. A clinical and radiographic case series of implants placed with the simplified minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique in the posterior maxilla. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:1942-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2014.08.005
  10. Mazor Z, Kfir E, Lorean A, Mijiritsky E, Horowitz RA. Flapless approach to maxillary sinus augmentation using minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation. Implant Dent 2011;20:434-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182391fe3
  11. Bataineh AB, Al-Dakes AM. The influence of length of implant on primary stability: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis. J Clin Exp Dent 2017;9:e1-e6.
  12. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:241-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.x
  13. Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:59-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12043
  14. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:216-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
  15. Lundgren S, Cricchio G, Hallman M, Jungner M, Rasmusson L, Sennerby L. Sinus floor elevation procedures to enable implant placement and integration: techniques, biological aspects and clinical outcomes. Periodontol 2000 2017;73:103-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12165