• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.28 no.8
• /
• pp.832-847
• /
• 2008

This study aims to provide a cornerstone for 'Pedagogical Discourse Analysis' by connecting linguistic theory to science education practice. Pedagogical Discourse Analysis (PDA) focuses its attention on finding educational implications beyond description on classroom language. This study is specially aimed at PDA in terms of the textual aspect, which has not sparked interest in science classroom discourse. For this, we supposed that the framework of PDA composed of two axes: 'thematic flow' and 'information flow'. We presented a case of science classroom discourse in terms of PDA to investigate opportunities in its potential and utilities. This trial crosses the line of traditional science classroom discourse analysis, which has been inclined to linguistics theory. It will also suggest a new horizon for science classroom discourse in an educational context.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.113-137
• /
• 1991

Coherence and relevaned concern the ways in which discouse is interpreted.In this inversigation, the notions of coherence and relevance are discussed with examples in which they account for discourse interpretation and Charolles's(1983)procedural model of coherence is compared and combined with Sperber & Wilson's(1986a)Principle of Relevance. It is shown that the notion of coherence is not adeqiately established, but that the procedural approach will be a bridge between the prinxiples of coherence and relevance, each of which still remainas to be enriched and completed.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2015.07a
• /
• pp.226-227
• /
• 2015

본 논문에서는 개화기 소설과 신문사설에 나타난 담화방식을 연구한 것이다. 개화기 소설과 신문 사설은 당시 대표적인 담론 매체였다. 대중들에게 쉽게 전달할 수 있는 담화방식은 개화기소설의 경우 대화체 토론체 연설체 담화방식으로 나타났다. 이는 신문 사설이 갖고 있는 한계인 설명 추상보다 진일보한 것으로 당대의 시대정신을 잘 구현한 것으로 볼 수 있다.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.11 no.3_4
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2000

The distinction between main structure and side structure in discourse which was central to narrative studies has lacked an adequate. formal definition. This study supports the contention that there exists a hierarchical structure between discourse units constituting main structures, substructures, and side structures. The aim of this study is twofold: (j) to present an adequate. formal definition that provides a general identification criterion for distinguishing main structure from substructure and side structure proposed by Kuppevelt, and (jj) to propose conceptual relations representing hierarchical structures in discourse based on Sowa's Conceptual Structure Theory. The proposed conceptual relations which represent hierarchy and pragmatic relations of discourse segments are: DIGR (digression). T-SHFT (topic shift), and FRAM (frame). This s study shows pragmatic functions can be incorporated within CST in a systematic way.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.465-494
• /
• 2017

Teachers' conceptions about teaching are important driving and also interfering forces which might affect their actual practice and training. This research explores preservice mathematics teachers' conceptions of teacher discourse, through tasks analyzing and evaluating teachers' moment-to-moment discourse moves which occur in authoritative and dialogical classroom discourse. Some facets of the preservice teachers' conceptions were congruent with dialogical discourse: they criticized teacher's one-way communication and ignoring students' voices; they supported teacher's questions probing students' thinking and receptive attitude to ward students' wrong answers. However, some deep and subtle facets of their conceptions were more congruent with authoritative discourse rather than dialogical discourse: they positively perceived teacher's closed, information seeking questions that funnel students' thinking to the predetermined procedure; they emotionally resisted teacher's questions which might facilitate dialogical engagement by allowing students to judge mathematical correctness of ideas from their peers. Preservice teachers' conceptions of teacher discourse explored in this research provide useful foundations on which to build continuous and coherent teacher professional development programs about classroom discourse.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.19-41
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this article was to a) identify how preservice teachers conceive feedbacks and subsequent classroom discourses, and b) compare them with those in reform-oriented mathematics classroom video for mathematics teachers' professional development about classroom discourse. This article analyzes feedback patterns and subsequent classroom discourses in preservice teachers' imaginary classroom scripts (lesson plays) and compares them with those in the reform-oriented classroom video dealing with the same teaching situation. Most of the preservice teachers' feedbacks focused the evaluation of students' responses and transmission of meaning (univocal function), whereas the teacher's feedback in the reform-oriented classroom allowed the whole class to validate or challenge the answers, thereby facilitating students' generation of meaning (dialogic function). The comparison analysis between the univocal discourse in a preservice teacher's lesson play and the dialogical discourse in the reform-oriented classroom video shows that teacher feedback serves as an important indicator for the main function of classroom discourse and the levels of students' cognitive participation, and also as a variable that determines and changes them. This case study suggests that to improve the quality of classroom discourse, preservice and in-service teachers need experience of perceiving the variety of feedback patterns available in specific teaching contexts and exploring ways to balance the univocal and dialogical functioning in their feedback move during the teacher training courses.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1997.10a
• /
• pp.477-492
• /
• 1997

본 연구에서는 한국어 대화체에 사용되는 담화표지와 부 대화의 유형을 분석하였다. 한국어 대화체에 사용되는 각종 담화표지에 대한 기존의 언어학적 연구를 정리하였고, 실제 한국어 대화자료를 녹취, 전사하여 연구에 필요한 데이터를 만들었으며, 이 데이터를 분석하여 한국어 대화체에서 관찰되는 부 대화의 유형을 분류하고자 하였다. 또한 각 부 대화와 담화표지들간의 관계를 규명하려는 시도를 하였다. 이것은 인간과 컴퓨터간의 특정 목적 대화를 구현하는 데도 중요한 역할을 한다. 특히 인간과 컴퓨터가 예약, 상담 등 특정 목적을 달성하기 위한 대화를 수행할 수 있는 프로그램을 구축하는 데 있어서, 인간이 실제로 사용하는 담화표지 및 의사소동 책략 등을 반영할 수 있게 해줄 것이다. 담화분석 연구자들이 실제 대화 자료를 분석하여 한국어 대화체의 기저에 흐르는 대화의 메카니즘을 다방면에서 종합적으로 정리하면 그 결과를 토대로 전산학 연구자들이 한층 바람직한 한국어 대화인지 모형을 만들어낼 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.203-222
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed the classroom discourse between teacher and students based on the Mehan(1979a)'s theory to examine the characteristics of the classroom discourse between teacher and students in high school statistics class. The results of this study on the structure of class showed that the statistics class in this study adopted knowledge transmission-oriented teacher-led class in which the framework of introductiondevelopment- arrangement, which is Mehan's basic 3 stages, is clearly represented. The results of examining I-R-E sequence showed that $I_T-R_T$ structure, in which the teacher asks questions and the teacher talks about the answer, frequently appeared. And the statistics class in this study was monological class in which students hardly participated. Through these results of this study, it was found that teacher should form the statistical context, in which students can participate in discourse, and build discourse learning community and induce argumentational discourse through metaprocess elicitation.

• Language and Information
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.36-48
• /
• 2000

이 논문에서는 국지적인 대명사의 해결을 위한 이론적인 틀로 널리 아려진 중심화이론의 여러 이론적인 정보포장이론이라는 새로운 담화의미론으로 발전시킬 수 있음을 보이고자 한다. 이로써 한국어 담화상에 나타나는 대명사의 선행사 탐색이 상당히 설득력있게 이루어질 수 있음을 보였다. 이를 위해 먼저 제한된 영역대화라 할 수 있는 호텔예약대화에 나타나는 영대명사의 특징에 대해 논의한다. 이어서, 대명사 해결과 관련하여 정보구조가 중심화이론의 주요 구성요소인 정향적 중심리스트 서열 구성에 직접 반영되어야 함을 보인다. 마지막으로 대명사를 담화통어할 수 있는 위치에 있어야 한다는 담화통어제약을 제안하여 광역대화에 나타나는 명시적인 대명사의 해결을 위한 하나의 대안을 제시한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.509-521
• /
• 2015

Argumentation is a social and collaborative dialogic process. A large number of researchers have focused on analyzing the structure of students' argumentation occurring in the scientific inquiry context, using the Toulmin's model of argument. Since SSI dialogic argumentation often presents distinctive features (e.g. interdisciplinary, controversial, value-laden, etc.), Toulmin's model would not fit into the context. Therefore, we attempted to develop an analytical framework for SSI dialogic argumentation by addressing the concepts of 'discourse clusters' and 'discourse schemes.' Discourse clusters indicated a series of utterances created for a similar dialogical purpose in the SSI contexts. Discourse schemes denoted meaningful discourse units that well represented the features of SSI reasoning. In this study, we presented six types of discourse clusters and 19 discourse schemes. We applied the framework to the data of students' group discourse on SSIs (e.g. euthanasia, nuclear energy, etc.) in order to verify its validity and applicability. The results indicate that the framework well explained the overall flow, dynamics, and features of students' discourse on SSI.