• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1997.10a
• /
• pp.477-492
• /
• 1997

본 연구에서는 한국어 대화체에 사용되는 담화표지와 부 대화의 유형을 분석하였다. 한국어 대화체에 사용되는 각종 담화표지에 대한 기존의 언어학적 연구를 정리하였고, 실제 한국어 대화자료를 녹취, 전사하여 연구에 필요한 데이터를 만들었으며, 이 데이터를 분석하여 한국어 대화체에서 관찰되는 부 대화의 유형을 분류하고자 하였다. 또한 각 부 대화와 담화표지들간의 관계를 규명하려는 시도를 하였다. 이것은 인간과 컴퓨터간의 특정 목적 대화를 구현하는 데도 중요한 역할을 한다. 특히 인간과 컴퓨터가 예약, 상담 등 특정 목적을 달성하기 위한 대화를 수행할 수 있는 프로그램을 구축하는 데 있어서, 인간이 실제로 사용하는 담화표지 및 의사소동 책략 등을 반영할 수 있게 해줄 것이다. 담화분석 연구자들이 실제 대화 자료를 분석하여 한국어 대화체의 기저에 흐르는 대화의 메카니즘을 다방면에서 종합적으로 정리하면 그 결과를 토대로 전산학 연구자들이 한층 바람직한 한국어 대화인지 모형을 만들어낼 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.9
• /
• pp.351-363
• /
• 2015

Discourse analysis is useful for examining discourse characteristics of dementia patients and differentiating them from normal adults. However, inconsistent tasks, transcription methods and measures have been utilized, thus analyses were inevitably unsystematic. The purpose of this study was to investigate tasks, transcription methods and measures of discourse studies in dementia. Studies on dementia discourses written in English were collected via Scopus database containing abstracts and citations from 2005 to 2014, and were analyzed in detail. From the results, the most frequently used task was 'storytelling-topic'. It was observed that use of consistent transcription conventions rendered more reliable transcription data. Measures could be categorized into coherence, cohesion, productivity, propositional syntactic lexical analysis, and fluency, and each category belonged to discourse processing levels (i.e., processing of conceptual networks, propositions, and natural language units). In conclusion, future research warrants not only utilization of discourse tasks depending on dementia types and features, but also application of consistent transcription conventions. Additionally, measures based on the discourse processing theory would enable us to systematically interpret discourse studies.

• Korean Journal of Cognitive Science
• /
• v.11 no.3_4
• /
• pp.23-32
• /
• 2000

The distinction between main structure and side structure in discourse which was central to narrative studies has lacked an adequate. formal definition. This study supports the contention that there exists a hierarchical structure between discourse units constituting main structures, substructures, and side structures. The aim of this study is twofold: (j) to present an adequate. formal definition that provides a general identification criterion for distinguishing main structure from substructure and side structure proposed by Kuppevelt, and (jj) to propose conceptual relations representing hierarchical structures in discourse based on Sowa's Conceptual Structure Theory. The proposed conceptual relations which represent hierarchy and pragmatic relations of discourse segments are: DIGR (digression). T-SHFT (topic shift), and FRAM (frame). This s study shows pragmatic functions can be incorporated within CST in a systematic way.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Cognitive Science Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.261-266
• /
• 2005

본 논문은 고기능 자폐 아동들이 담화 주제어 연속성(topic continuity)을 어떻게 습득하는지에 대해 검토하였다. 연구의 목적을 위하여 세 고기능 자폐 아동(9;11-12:2)의 자연 발화를 관찰 분석하였다. 사전 연구에 의하면, 자폐아동들은 의사소통의 기본적인 규칙을 잘 이해하지 못할 뿐만 아니라 타인의 사고와 기대 등에 민감하지 못하여 담화 주제를 적절히 유지하거나 전환하는(topic shift) 일에 많은 어려움을 겪는다. 본 연구는 한국 자폐아동들이 주제어의 유지와 전환 등, 담화 화용적(discourse-pragmatic) 기능의 발달 양상을 규명하는 것을 주요 목표로 한다. 본 연구의 자료는 세 자폐 아동의 자연 발화 내용으로서 1주-2주에 한번씩 매번 방문 시 120분 동안 녹음하였다. 분석 결과 다음의 몇 가지 습득 양상을 발견하였다. 첫째, 세 자폐 아동들에게서 발견된 주제 유지 빈도는 정상 아동들에 비해 낮았다. 한편. 이 아이들은 가끔 화제를 자신의 담화 주제로 돌려 자신의 주제 중심으로 대화를 지속했다. 이 아동들은 대화 상대자의 주제에 대해서는 민감하지 않지만 자신의 주제를 유지하려는 경향을 보이기도 한다. 둘째, 개별 아동을 검토한 결과, 담화 주제의 지속성이 높은 발화를 하는 아동은 현재 담화 주제에 더 민감하고 반향어를 산출할 때에도 자기 자신의 말 반복과 담화 상대자의 말을 반복하는 빈도가 별로 차이가 나지 않았다. 반면, 담화 주제의 지속성이 낮은 발화를 하는 아동은 이전 담화 주제에 더 민감하고, 반향어는 담화 상대자의 말 보다는 자기 자신의 말을 반복하는 비율이 더 높았다. 본 연구의 결과는 자폐 아동들이 담화 주제를 지속하는 능력이 많이 부족하지만, 담화 주제의 연속성은 다른 발화 유형과 상호 작용을 하면서 발달될 수 있다는 가능성을 보여 주었다. 따라서 본 연구 결과는 앞으로 자폐 아동의 연구가 집단 간의 연구뿐만 아니라 개별 아동의 발화에 쓰인 유형 간의 상호 관계를 주목함으로써 자폐 아동의 개별적 언어 치료에 새로운 시각을 심어 줄 가능성을 시사한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.28 no.8
• /
• pp.832-847
• /
• 2008

This study aims to provide a cornerstone for 'Pedagogical Discourse Analysis' by connecting linguistic theory to science education practice. Pedagogical Discourse Analysis (PDA) focuses its attention on finding educational implications beyond description on classroom language. This study is specially aimed at PDA in terms of the textual aspect, which has not sparked interest in science classroom discourse. For this, we supposed that the framework of PDA composed of two axes: 'thematic flow' and 'information flow'. We presented a case of science classroom discourse in terms of PDA to investigate opportunities in its potential and utilities. This trial crosses the line of traditional science classroom discourse analysis, which has been inclined to linguistics theory. It will also suggest a new horizon for science classroom discourse in an educational context.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.203-222
• /
• 2015

This study analyzed the classroom discourse between teacher and students based on the Mehan(1979a)'s theory to examine the characteristics of the classroom discourse between teacher and students in high school statistics class. The results of this study on the structure of class showed that the statistics class in this study adopted knowledge transmission-oriented teacher-led class in which the framework of introductiondevelopment- arrangement, which is Mehan's basic 3 stages, is clearly represented. The results of examining I-R-E sequence showed that $I_T-R_T$ structure, in which the teacher asks questions and the teacher talks about the answer, frequently appeared. And the statistics class in this study was monological class in which students hardly participated. Through these results of this study, it was found that teacher should form the statistical context, in which students can participate in discourse, and build discourse learning community and induce argumentational discourse through metaprocess elicitation.

• Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Korea Conference
• /
• 1998.06c
• /
• pp.409-412
• /
• 1998

본 논문의 목적은 자연음에 가까운 합성음을 구현하기 위한 기초작업으로 한국어의 운율구조를 담화구조와 연관시켜 그 상관관계를 밝히는데 있다. 특히 문장내에서 주격표지로 작용하는 '이/가/은/는' 조사의 운율패턴에 중점을 두었다. 주어가 문장 내에서 어떤 자리에 오는가에 의해 조사어절을 구분해 본 결과 Fo값은 문장의 뒤, 즉 동사 앞 위치로 갈수록 낮아졌다. 중립적 문장에서 문두의 위치라면 '은/는' 조사의 기본주파수가 두드러짐이 예상되며, 이와 상대적으로, 담화가 구성되어 의사소통의 의미가 많이 가미될수록 '은/가' 조사의 두드러짐이 예상된다고 정리해 볼 수 있다. 운율구 경계의 발생은 특정한 문장성분의 전.후에서 주로 나타나는데 절이나 독립어 뒤에서, 그리고 부사어, 관형어, 목적어 앞에서 빈번히 일어남을 알 수 있었다.

• Koreanishche Zeitschrift fur Deutsche Sprachwissenschaft
• /
• v.6
• /
• pp.263-285
• /
• 2002

In dieser Arbeit wird versucht, das Gricesche Kooperationsprinzip und die dazu $geh\"{o}renden$ Maximen unter das Perspektiv der allgemin rnenschlichen Handlung zu revidieren. Vor allem wird in Frage gestellt, ob die Beteiligten an einem $Gespr\"{a}chsgeschehen$ unter sich in Wirklichkeit kooperieren. Um die Hypothese, dass die $Gespr\"{a}chsteilnehmer$ in der zugrunde liegenden Interaktionsebene kooperieren, zu $best\"{a}tigen$, wird auf das sogenannte iterierte Gefangenedilemma $r\"{u}ckgegriffen$M. Im $Anschlu\ss$ daran wird ein authentisches $Gespr\"{a}ch$ besonders in Hinsicht auf kooperative, sprachliche Interaktionen analysiert. Durch dieses empirsche Analyseverfahren manifestiert sieh, dass die Griceschen Kooperationsmaximen auf eine konkrete $Gespr\"{a}chssituation$ revidiert anzuwenden sind, denn in den verschiedentlich realisierten $Gespr\"{a}chen\;das\;Gespr\"{a}chsziel$ nicht als auf maximal effektiven Informationsaustausch $eingeschr\"{a}nkt$ betrachtet werden kann.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.487-509
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to analyze classroom discourse in the math classroom of middle school in China, which has a unique math classroom background of entrance examination for high school. To this end, this study analyzed teacher question statistics and episodes by teacher question type as starting speech in mathematics classroom discourse, and five IRF subtypes were especially identified by class discourse structure analysis. The data were analyzed focusing on a total of 15 transcripts of math classes recorded by three math teachers at H School in Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China, and written interviews of teachers. According to the results of this study, an average of 20 teacher questions were observed for each class, and the teacher question type was classified into confirmation question (understanding confirmation question, explanation request question, and double check question) and information question (information presentation question). In addition, according to classroom discourse analysis, the IRF discourse structure was divided into fragmentary evaluation, evaluation+reason, evidence of explanation, evaluation+student response re-statement, guidance on other thoughts or solutions, and student answer correction or teacher opinion presentation.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.19-41
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this article was to a) identify how preservice teachers conceive feedbacks and subsequent classroom discourses, and b) compare them with those in reform-oriented mathematics classroom video for mathematics teachers' professional development about classroom discourse. This article analyzes feedback patterns and subsequent classroom discourses in preservice teachers' imaginary classroom scripts (lesson plays) and compares them with those in the reform-oriented classroom video dealing with the same teaching situation. Most of the preservice teachers' feedbacks focused the evaluation of students' responses and transmission of meaning (univocal function), whereas the teacher's feedback in the reform-oriented classroom allowed the whole class to validate or challenge the answers, thereby facilitating students' generation of meaning (dialogic function). The comparison analysis between the univocal discourse in a preservice teacher's lesson play and the dialogical discourse in the reform-oriented classroom video shows that teacher feedback serves as an important indicator for the main function of classroom discourse and the levels of students' cognitive participation, and also as a variable that determines and changes them. This case study suggests that to improve the quality of classroom discourse, preservice and in-service teachers need experience of perceiving the variety of feedback patterns available in specific teaching contexts and exploring ways to balance the univocal and dialogical functioning in their feedback move during the teacher training courses.