• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Fisheries Technology Conference
• /
• 2002.10a
• /
• pp.104-105
• /
• 2002

N-nitrosamine(NA)은 여러 가지 발암성 물질 중에서도 발암력이 매우 강하면서, 각종식품에 널리 분포되어 있고, 위, 간, 식도 및 신장 등 신체의 여러 부분에서 발암력을 나타낸다는 점과 nitroso 화합물 중 어떤 물질들은 후손에게까지 악성종양의 유발에 영향을 미친다는 점들을 들 수 있다. nitroso 화합물의 생성은 식품중에 존재하는 아질산염과 제2급아민이나 혹은 제 3급아민과의 상호반응으로 생성되기 때문에 식품에 있어서 이들의 존재가 상당한 논쟁의 대상이 되고 있다. (중략)

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2012.05a
• /
• pp.141-142
• /
• 2012

점과 선은 도형의 기초이며 수학과 물리학에서 중요한 요소라고 할 수 있다. 도형의 발달은 고대 이집트에서 이루어졌으며 이러한 도형의 발달은 그리스에서 체계화 되었으며 대표적으로 유클리드의 '기하학 원론'에서 점과 선에 대한 정의와 공리 등에 인하여 기하학은 발전하였다. 이러한 점에 관한 정의는 시대에 따라 재해석되고 논쟁과 토론의 과정을 거쳐왔으며. 즉 '점이 부분이 없는 것'이라는 기하학 원론'의 정의는 점의 존재성에 대한 다양한 철학적 사유를 이끌었으며 19세기 수학 기초의 위기 속에서 다양한 수학적 접근법이 나타나게 되었다. 본 논문에서는 점의 기존의 정의와 다양한 접근 방법에 대해서 살펴보고자 한다.

• Journal of the KSME
• /
• v.24 no.6
• /
• pp.452-458
• /
• 1984

동적 파괴역학 연구의 필요성과 응용분야를 설명하였다. 다음 2장에 동적 파괴역학 연구의 역 사적인 발전과정을 간단히 살펴보면서 현재 이 분야의 문제점과 논쟁대상이 되고 있는 점들을 지적해 보고자 한다. 3장에는 탄성 동적 파괴역학 문제, 4장에는 탄소성 동적 파괴역학 문제에 대해서 각각 실험적연구, 수치 해석적 연구, 이론적인 연구의 측면으로 나누어서 이 강좌를 전개 할려고 한다. 5장에서는 Crack Arrest에 관한 이론 및 실제응용 예를 간단히 설명하고 6장에서 고찰 및 결론을 맺음으로서 이 강좌를 마무리 지울려고 한다.

• Electronics and Telecommunications Trends
• /
• v.22 no.6
• /
• pp.158-169
• /
• 2007

지금까지 인터넷 망의 공개성과 중립성이 콘텐츠와 응용 서비스의 활력과 발전을 가져온 것이 사실이지만, 기술적 측면에서 보면 차별화의 행위 중에는 유익한 면과 시장에 해가 되는 양면성을 지니고 있다. 망중립성 규제의 내용과 범위에 따라 이해관계자의 대응방향을 모의상황을 통해 추정해보고, 정책의 방향을 모색해보는 것은 중요한 의미를 가진다. 모의상황 설정에서 초점을 둔 것은 규제정책의 범위에 따른 상호 거래관계, 혁신기회, 거래비용, 도입비용 등의 동태이다. 결론은 기술의 빠른 발전에 의한 미래의 불확실성이 완벽한 망중립성을 주장하는 것을 어렵게 한다. 한편, 차별화(discrimination)와 차등화(differentiation)의 경제적 의미는 다르지만, 망중립성 규제의 옹호론자들은 두 가지 모두 차별화의 범주에 넣어 규제하려 한다. 이러한 시각의 차이는 논쟁을 핵심으로부터 벗어나게 하는 원인이 되고 있다. 망사업자의 차별화를 제한함에 있어 정책의 올바른 방향은 차별화의 행위가 갖는 유용한 면과 위해한 면의 균형을 이루는 것이 핵심 과제이다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.203-217
• /
• 2018

The research objective of this study is to analyze the aspects of small group decision-making process based on reading news reports in the context of the socio-scientific issues (SSI) activity related to climate change. Twenty-two high school students from Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, were asked to read two news reports on the UN climate change conferences and take a stance on joining the Paris Agreement both as an individual and as a small group. The news reports were analyzed in terms of genre, discourse, and style adapting the critical discourse analysis (CDA) and the decision-making processes of the small groups were examined on recognizing a problem and evaluating alternatives and decisions. The results from analyzing the news reports denoted that the Paris agreement is not only related to finding ideal solutions to climate change, but rather, connected to political or economic interests and power relationship. In the stage of recognizing a problem, meanwhile, different frames which students recognize the Paris agreement and discourses in the foreground of the news reports were the critical causes in terms of identifying the problem. In the stage of evaluating alternatives and decisions, the equity and fairness were the criteria for the small group discussions. This study implies the necessity of the scientific literacy instruction to develop the ability to critical reading in the context of the SSI.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.35
• /
• pp.114-146
• /
• 2006

Now, Korea-U.S.A Free Trade Agreement talk is underway in Korea. In FTA talks, the issues on audio-visual sector including screen quota, opening of broadcasting and telecommunication to the U.S.A. are becoming a hot potato. Globalization has been speed up by mass media and telecommunications. Cultures are no longer bounded by specific place but, through the migration of persons and the electronic flows of information, ideas and images, transgress established boundaries. So issues and debates have to be focused on global culture and cultural imperialism. Some would argue global culture is the consequences of capitalist world-system, so dominance by the center should be criticized and vanished. Some would say that global culture would help recipient society's people with cultural diversify and improvement. The issues on culture and communication, particularly at international level call for our attention in light of cultural identity, homogenization and diversity. Although I criticize the cultural imperialism thesis, I suggest critical acceptance of cultural imperialism. That is the observation of complexity between internal and external dynamics. The process of cultural imperialism is not simple and unitary. It rather involves the various forces of internal dynamics along with external forces.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.30 no.8
• /
• pp.933-952
• /
• 2010

This study aims to characterize debate on a socio-scientific issue in the Internet and to provide implications from a postmodernist perspective. This study concentrates on disentanglement of the complex relationship among society, economy, politics and science in an issue and characterization of the given text centering on its originality, the relationship between writer and reader, and the purpose of utterance. Sixty-six most read articles on a web message board were chosen and analyzed as a typical case of a socio-scientific issue in the internet. In them, five scientific disputes were identified: the cause of mad cow disease (MCD), specified risk material and the incubation period, the cause of new variant Creutzfeld-Jakob disease (vCJD), vulnerability of vCJD and the relation of Alzheimer and vCJD in American patients. Each argument is intertwined with social, economic and political problems such as its impact on the domestic beef market, feeding environment of imported cattle and the retaliation against denial of importation. With regard to originality, it is found that the originality of an author is weakened but communal through repetitive quotation of 'Peom', cutting and pasting, and engagement of readers with their comments. Furthermore, in order to close the gap between writer and reader, identity and personal narrative of the writers are often introduced into their writing. In terms of purpose of utterance, these are intended to deliver one's feelings or facilitate human behavior rather than inform through verification of a principle.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.119-166
• /
• 2019

The risk of electromagnetic field(EMF) from power lines has been heavily disputed whenever high-voltage power line towers were built in South Korea. Local communities and civic groups had regarded burying the lines in the ground as an alternative to building power line towers. In 2014, however, when an elementary school science teacher reported the results of EMF measurements over the underground power lines to the Asian Citizens' Center for Environment and Health (ACCEH), the risk controversy over underground power lines took a whole new turn. The level of EMF from underground power lines turned out to be higher, and therefore more harmful than that from power line towers. In the debates that took place from then on over the EMF risk, ACCEH and NIER(National Institute of Environmental Research) presented conflicting topographies of EMF risk. This paper examines measuring practices of ACCEH and NIER by analyzing the measuring sites, measuring devices, and measuring heights chosen by each organization. This paper further examines how ACCEH and NIER mobilized various standards(EMF exposure limit, measurement guideline, categorization of carcinogens) differently. This controversy on the EMF from underground power lines of Seoul has raised concerns on the non-thermal effects of EMF in the long-term exposure and has led people to question whether burying the power lines is the safe alternative to building power line towers. Furthermore, this suggests conflicting answers on whether Seoul, where 90 % of transmission lines were already buried, is a safely managed place or not.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.351-378
• /
• 2020

The purpose of the study was to identify the latent classes of meta-awareness of gender discrimination among Korean young adults using Latent Profile Analysis based on 'perceived ambivalence toward men among women', 'perceived ambivalent sexism among men', 'perceived gender(reverse-) discrimination in Korea'. After identifying the latent classes, the difference between gender role conflict, sense of distance from the opposite sex, and support for gender discrimination issues were explored among the classified groups. As a result, 3 latent classes among women and 2 latent classes among men were identified. Latent classes among women were named 'women with low sensitivity of sexism', 'women with high sensitivity of sexism' and 'women against sexism' and latent classes among men were named 'men with perception of gender equality', 'men with perception of reverse discrimination'. Types with higher levels of meta-awareness of gender discrimination were related with higher gender role conflict and higher sense of distance from the opposite sex. Among women, types with higher levels of meta-awareness of gender discrimination perceived higher levels of gender discrimination and showed more support for gender discrimination issues while among men, types with higher levels of meta-perception of gender discrimination only perceived higher levels of reverse discrimination. Based on the present findings, implications about the severe gender conflict among Korean young adults are further discussed in the article.

• Analyses & Alternatives
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.27-59
• /
• 2023

This study aims to serve as a critical comparison of the currently controversial 'new cold war' discourse. It took three triggers for the 'new cold war' discourse to emerge as a major issue in the media and academia and to have real political impact. With the launch of China's 'Belt and Road' project and Russia's annexation of Crimea leading to the 'Ukraine crisis,' the 'new cold war' discourse has begun to take shape. Trump's U.S.-China trade spat has brought the 'new cold war' debate to the forefront. The 'new cold war' debate is currently being intensified by the Biden administration's framing of "democracy versus authoritarianism" and Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Currently, there is no consensus among scholars on whether the controversial 'new cold war' is a new version, or a continuation of the historically defined concept of the Cold War. The term 'New Cold War' is less of an analytical concept and more of a topical term that has yet to achieve analytical status, let alone a theoretical validation and systematization, and the related debate remains at the level of assertion or discourse. Through this comparative analysis, I will argue that the ongoing discourse of the 'New Cold War' does not have the instrumental explanatory power to analyze the transitional phenomena of the world order today.