The Aspects of Small Group Decision-making Process based on Reading News Reports: Focused on Climate Change related Socio-scientific Issues Activity |
Kim, Jong-Uk
(Seoul National University)
Gwak, Je-Yeon (Seoul National University) Kwon, Ji-Yeon (Seoul National University) Ha, Yoon-Hee (Seoul National University) Lee, Jeong-A (Seoul National University) Kim, Chan-Jong (Seoul National University) Choe, Seung-Urn (Seoul National University) |
1 | Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision‐making about socio‐scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182. DOI |
2 | Ratcliffie, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientic issues. Philadelphia: Open university. |
3 | Rennie, L., & Stocklmyer, P.J. (2003). The communication of science and technology: Past, present and future agendas. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 759-773. DOI |
4 | Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, (pp. 729-780). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
5 | Rogers, R. (2011). Critical approaches to discourse analysis in educational research. In R. Rogers (Ed.), An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education. (pp. 1-20). NY: Routledge. |
6 | Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific Issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. DOI |
7 | Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488. DOI |
8 | Christensen, C. K. (2011). Young adults' accounts of scientific knowledge when responding to a television news report of contested science. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(2), 115-145. |
9 | Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49. DOI |
10 | Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. CA: Sage. |
11 | Department for Education (DfE). (2015). National curriculum in England: science programmes of study. Retrieved March from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study |
12 | Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. NJ: Prentice Hall. |
13 | Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: E. Arnold. |
14 | Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. DOI |
15 | EU "Must be binding on carbon reduction", Korea, US, and developing countries showed disapproval. (2015, Dec. 2). Jung-ang Ilbo. |
16 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. MA: Polity Press. |
17 | Fairclough, N. (2000). Discourse, social theory, and social research: the discourse of welfare reform. Journal of Socio Linguistics, 4(2), 163-195. |
18 | Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research In R. Wodak & M. Meyer(Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, (pp. 63-94). London: Sage. |
19 | Korean Association for Social Linguistics (KASL). (2012). Social linguistics dictionary. Seoul: Sotong. |
20 | Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E.,Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655. DOI |
21 | Kress, G. (1988). Language as social practice. In G. Kress (Ed.), Communication and culture: An introduction, (pp. 78-129).Sydney, Australia: UNSW press. |
22 | Largest ever-10 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions. (2011, Nov. 11). Han-kook Ilbo. |
23 | Lee, J. A., & Kim, C. J. (2017). Teaching and learning science in authoritative classrooms: Teachers' power and students' approval in Korean elementary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 1-27. |
24 | Lee, S. (2008). Climate change in international relations. Peace Studies, 16(2), 30-66. |
25 | Lee, S., & Lee, H. (2014). Pattern of college students' informal reasoning and reactions to anomalous evidence on the controversial nuclear power generation issue. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(6), 148-168. |
26 | Lee, W. (2009). 'News analysis', a new genre in korean newspapers: Linguistic and discoursal realizations and its hybrid nature. Discourse and Cognition 16(3), 129-170. DOI |
27 | Lemke, J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E.W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice, (pp. 33-47). Arlington: National Science Teachers Association. |
28 | Shin, J. (2014). Philosophy of welfare state. Seoul: Ingangwa bokji. |
29 | Lin, S. -S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1021-1046. |
30 | Shin, B. (2011). The international politics of climate change and U.S.-China relation. Korean journal of international relations, 51(1), 127-158. |
31 | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. CA: Sage. |
32 | Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. |
33 | UNFCCC. (2015). Adoption of the Paris agreement. I: proposal by the president (Draft Decision). Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09.pdf |
34 | Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media. (pp. 69-93). Berlin: W. de Gruyter |
35 | Van Dijk, T. A. (1986). News as discourse. NY: Longman |
36 | Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. DOI |
37 | Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical discours analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. (pp. 352-365). Oxford: Blackwell |
38 | Fjortoft, M. R. (2013). The critical element of critical discourse analysis. SYNAPS - A Journal of Professional Communication 28, 67-75. |
39 | Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In van Dijk, TA (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. (pp. 258-284). London: Sage. |
40 | Fang, Y. J. (2001). Reporting the same events? A critical analysis of chinese print news media texts. Discourse & Society, 12(5), 585-613. DOI |
41 | Gruber, H. (1993). Evaluation devices in newspaper reports. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(5), 469-486. DOI |
42 | Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83-118. DOI |
43 | Vestergaard, T. (2000). That's not news: Persuasive and expository genres. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Analyzing professional genres. (pp. 97-120). Amsterdam: Benjamin. |
44 | Wodak, R. (1999). Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century. Research in Language and Social Interaction, 32, 185-193. DOI |
45 | Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. NY: Routledge. |
46 | Grace, M. (2009). Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 551-570. DOI |
47 | Gwak, Y. (2009). Qualitative research: philosophy, art, and education. Paju: Kyoyukkwahaksa. |
48 | Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Hodder Arnold. |
49 | Hanrahan, M. U. (2005). Engaging with difference in science classrooms: Using CDA to identify interpersonal aspects of inclusive pedagogy. Critical Studies in Education, 46(2), 107-127. DOI |
50 | Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. NY: Routledge. |
51 | Hanrahan, M. U. (2006). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90(1), 8-43. DOI |
52 | Hansen, A. (2009). Science, communication and media. In R. Holliman, E. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Investigating science communication in the age, (pp. 105-127). Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
53 | McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2012). Encouraging and equipping students to engage critically with science in the news: What can we learn from the literature?, Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 1-49. DOI |
54 | Maeng, S., & Kim, C. (2009). Student-centeredness of the modality of science teaching based on discourse language code. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(1), 116-136. |
55 | McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2010). Critical reading of science‐based news reports: Establishing a knowledge, skills and attitudes framework. International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), 727-752. DOI |
56 | McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2011). From aspiration to action: a learning intentions model to promote critical engagement with science in the print-based media. Research in Science Education, 41(5), 691-710. DOI |
57 | Next Generation Science Standards Lead State (NGSS). (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. D.C.: National Academies Press. |
58 | Ministry of Environment. (2016). Guideline of the paris agreement. Retrieved from http://library.me.go.kr/search/DetailView.ax?sid=1&cid=5618363 |
59 | Murcia, K. (2009). Science in the news: An evaluation of students' scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 55(3), 40-45. |
60 | National Assembly Research Service (NARS). (2016). Major contents of the Paris agreement and plan of national assembly. Seoul: Gyeong Seongmunhwasa. |
61 | Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., & Korpan, C. A. (2003). University students’ interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 123-145. DOI |
62 | OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. |
63 | Young, R. E. (1992). Critical theory and classroom talk. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters. |
64 | Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio‐scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 371-400. DOI |
65 | Xiao, S., & Sandoval, W. (2017). Associations between attitudes towards science and children's evaluation of information about socioscientific issues. Contributions from History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science and Mathematics, 26(3), 247-269. |
66 | Yoon, P. J. (2011). Is the free market economy really fair and just?. In G. S. Hwang (Ed.), Fairness and justice: Seeking for sustainable growth in Korean society, (pp. 89-146). Seoul: Cho-sun Ilbosa. |
67 | Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. DOI |
68 | Wodak, R. (2001b). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer(Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, (pp. 63-94). London: Sage |
69 | Zeidler, D. L. Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377. DOI |
70 | Wodak, R. (2001a). What CDA is about - a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer(Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, (pp. 1-13). London: Sage. |
71 | Cho, Y. (2015). Field research and action research. Anthropology of Education, 18(4), 1-49. |
72 | Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. |
73 | Hong, J. L., & Chang, N. K. (2004). Analysis of Korean high school students’ decision-making processes in solving a problem involving biological knowledge. Research In Science Education, 34, 97-111. DOI |
74 | Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). The Australian curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au |
75 | Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69(4), 453-475. DOI |
76 | Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. MA: Blackwell. |
77 | Kim, H., Kim, H., & Cho, S. (2011). Mapping news frames of major dailies' climate change reports in South Korea. Social Science Studies, 19(2), 76-106. |
78 | Hwang, G. (2011). Justice: Fair competition and neutralization of luck. In G. S. Hwang (Ed.), Fairness and justice: Seeking for sustainable growth in Korean society, (pp. 11-46). Seoul: Cho-sun Ilbosa. |
79 | IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC |
80 | Joo, Y. (2013). News media's political orientation and their framing of climate change in South Korea. Journal of Communication Science, 13(3), 591-626. |
81 | Kim, K. (2010). Global warming controversy-Science, nation state, and civil society in globalizing world-. Cogito, 69, 311-340. |
82 | Klosterman, M., Sadler, T., & Brown, J. (2012). Science teachers’ use of mass media to address socio-scientific and sustainability issues. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 51-74. DOI |
83 | Kolsto, S. D. (2001a). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. DOI |
84 | Kolsto, S. D. (2001b). 'To trust or not to trust,...'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientificissue. International journal of science education, 23(9), 877-901. DOI |
85 | RAND. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. CA: Rand Corporation. |
86 | Oreskes, N. (2014). The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know we're not wrong?. In: J. DiMento, P. Doughman (Eds.), Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren, (pp. 105-148). Cambridge: MIT press. |
87 | Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the reader’s world meets the world on paper?. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327. DOI |