• Digital Contents
• /
• no.6 s.85
• /
• pp.58-61
• /
• 2000

최근 들어 벤처 기업들 간의 손잡기가 눈에 띄게 늘고 있다. 이는 굳이 합병이나 인수의 형태가 아니라도 업무 제휴 기술제휴, 공동개발, 공동 출자등 다양한 형태로 나타나고 있다. 이것은 비단 우리나라만의 현상이 아니다. 미국 또한 이미 수년 전부터 벤처기업들 간의 인수 합병이 있어왔고 현재까지 이어지고 있다. 우리나라의 경우 아직도 두렷한 인수나 합병은 나타나지 않고 있다. 이것은 여러가지 측면에서 분석이 가능하다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.1151-1156
• /
• 2011

Leveraged buyouts (LBO) means the acquisition of a company using bonds and loans. There are the prolific volumes of LBO transactions in the international M&A markets, and its influence to the financial market is increasingly huge. However, there are very few LBO transaction in the domestic M&A market and there are also few researches in this field due to the private nature of LBO transactions. Once a company is privatized through a LBO transaction, it is not so long before it is relisted on the stock exchange or it is resold to a third-party investor. In order to repay the borrowed money, an LBO investor may decide to end a company's private status through an exit via an initial public offering (IPO) or a takeover. In this paper, we expand Kaplan's study on the organizational status of post leveraged buyout (LBO) transaction. We find that there is a significant change starting 1986. Most notably, fewer LBOs remain private, the median holding period of the LBO was cut in half to 3.2 years and of those that exit, IPO exits had significantly shorter holding periods. Regression analysis shows that good market conditions lengthen the holding period of a LBO investment whereas the size of the transaction shortens it.

• 정보화사회
• /
• s.183
• /
• pp.13-15
• /
• 2006

증권예탁결제원이 지난해 12월 29일 밝힌 바에 따르면, 2005년 한해 유가증권시장법인과 코스닥시장법인들의 기업인수합병이 러시를 이룬 것으로 나타났다. 전년 84개에 비해 44.0% 증가한 121개사가 M&A를 완료하거나 진행중이라는 것. 특히, 코스닥시장법인의 기업인수합병이 전체 121개중 80개사로 유가증권시장법인 41개사의 2배 가까이 달했다. 이는 전년도 코스닥시장법인 47개사 대비 70% 증가한 수치다. 사유별로는 합병 62개사, 영업양.수도 26개사, 주식교환 33개사로 나타나 기업간 M&A에 있어서 영업양수도나 주식교환 보다는 합병을 선호하는 것으로 분석됐다.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.41-54
• /
• 2022

Despite the recent rapid advancement of science and technology, we have been experiencing the decline in productivity since the 2000s. This study aims to investigate the decline at both industry and firm levels, by looking at the emergence and growth of large firms such as Amazon, Alphabet, and Apple and M&A trends. Following the results of previous studies, our results show that productivity at industry level has decreased since the 2000s. Particularly, in the period after 2011, the deterioration of allocative efficiency due to the large firms and the decline in the growth rate of surviving firms in the industry with low ratio of large firms contributed to the productivity decline. On the other hand, our analysis at firm level demonstrates that the productivity of firms that acquired IT firms improved over the entire period. While M&As have a positive impact on productivity, M&As with a demand-side motive such as market penetration and expansion of channels have a relatively larger impact than the ones for production or operation efficiency. Our results also suggest that the higher the proportion of large firms in a specific industry, the lower the productivity of individual firms in the same industry. Overall, given that the industry's structural changes for digital transformation tends to strengthen the growth of large firms, our findings have significant implications by empirically identifying the relationships of the emergence of large firms, the acquisition of IT/Non-IT firms, and motivations for M&As to firm/industry productivity.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.191-213
• /
• 2008

This study tests and reconfirms the wealth transfer of mergers and acquisitions(M&As) by examining the changes in and the relationship between shareholder and bondholder wealth after the announcements of M&As for the publicly listed firms in Korea Stock Exchange and KOSDAQ market during $1999{\sim}2006$. The change in shareholder wealth is measured by the Cumulative Abnormal Return(CAR) at the M&A announcements, and the change in bondholder wealth is calculated using the Yield Spread Change(YSC) and the change in acquiring firms' credit ratings. The empirical tests show that the CAR of 344 sample acquiring firms at the announcement is 3.59%, which confirms results of the prior research on M&As in Korean market. The average YSC for 35 sample acquiring firms between $2001{\sim}2006$ proves to be negative when we use the yield spread of firms with comparable credit ratings as a benchmark, which means that the acquiring firms' bondholders gain with the announcements of M&As. We find the same result using another benchmark-the yield spread of government bonds. The improvement in the acquiring firms' credit ratings one year after the M&As also indicates that the M&As, on average, increase bondholder wealth. Our test results are consistent with those of the existing studies on the effect of bondholder wealth after the M&As in the United States, which shows that the bondholder wealth increases after the M&As. We do not find the evidence that there is a wealth transfer from the acquiring firms' bondholders to the shareholders after the M&A announcements. Rather, this study confirms that the wealth of the acquiring firms' bondholders increases in the M&As in Korea.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.45-66
• /
• 2009

A number of companies are considering for merger and acquisition (M&A) as one of business strategies for their growth and survival. However, many of them do not create the synergy they had sought, and failed M&A, often result in negative outcomes in terms of productivity, market share, profitability and turnover of qualified employees. There have been numerous research studies conducted to analyze the factors that determine the success and failure of M&A, and it has been found that with the increasing dependence of many companies on information systems, post-M&A IS (information systems) integration success has a critical effect on the success of M&A. However, there have been very few studies on post-M&A IS integration success, and most have been restricted to integration of IS organizations or physical information systems. In order to conduct a comprehensive research on the factors that affect the success of post-M&A IS integration, this study surveyed preceding researches on not only information systems but also strategic management, economics, finance, HRM (human resource management) and organization management. Based on the findings, a comprehensive and integrated model of the influential factors on post-M&A IS integration has been proposed. The proposed model categorizes the factors into perspectives of M&A, strategy, organization, HRM and IS, and provides an empirical evaluation of each factor on the success of IS integration based on comparative case studies.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• no.2 s.127
• /
• pp.34-35
• /
• 2009

M&A 과정을 크게 둘로 구분하다면 하나는 M&A 계약 자체의 성사에 이르는 '딜메이킹(Deal Making)' 과정과 다른 하나는 'PMI(Post-Merger Integration)', 즉 인수 후 통합과정이다. 많은 기업들이 성공적인 M&A를 위해 기업가치평가, 실사, 계약서 등에 명시돼야 할 권리 및 의무관계, 인수가격 결정을 위한 협상 등에 온 힘을 기울이게 된다. 하니만 인수 합병을 단행한다고 해서 모든 기업이 주주가치 창출이나 경쟁력 향상과 같은 시너지 효과를 누리지는 못한다. 인수 합병 후에 일어나는 통합의 문제는 그 복잡합이나 조직에 미치는 영향력에 있어 더 많은 주의와 노력을 요한다.

• Management & Information Systems Review
• /
• v.35 no.4
• /
• pp.79-98
• /
• 2016

A large number of Chinese enterprises have grown up and become increasingly competitive. Chinese firms have ventured abroad to search for new sources of growth. Overseas mergers and acquisitions of Chinese companies has been developed rapidly through extensive opening policy and active support system by government. The main purpose of this study is to identify the factors that affect the outcomes of overseas mergers and acquisitions made by Chinese firms in recent years, particularly, financial performance of the acquiring firms. This study aims to analyze systematically financial performance and its determinants of Chinese overseas M&A in recent years. This study chooses a sample of 167 overseas mergers and acquisitions in the manufacturing industry in China and the relevant data were collected during the period 2006 to 2012. The data were analyzed by using a multiple regression analysis to identify determinants of corporate performance. We showed that cultural distance, past performance, state ownership, and interaction between cultural distance and past performance. Findings of this study can provide useful guidance to outward Chinese M&A in the future.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.163-181
• /
• 1998

본 연구는 Tobin-Q 비율(이하 토빈 Q, 또는 Q)을 이용하여 합병제의기업과 피합병대상기업을 합병전 경영성과의 우열에 따라 분류하고, 분류 집단별 초과수익률을 측정 검증함으로써 합병전 후의 합병관련기업의 합병효과를 분석하였다. 실증분석 결과를 보면 합병제의기업과 피합병기업 모두 합병 공시 후 양의 초과수익률을 얻는 것으로 나타났으며, 합병제의기업은 토빈 Q가 낮을수록 합병성과가 크게 나타났고, 피합병대상기업은 토빈 Q가 높을수록 합병성과가 크게 나타났다. 또한 합병제의기업과 피합병대상기업의 토빈 Q를 동시에 고려한 경우에는 합병제의기업의 Q가 높고 피합병대상기업의 Q가 낮으면, 합병성과가 작았고, 합병제의기업의 Q가 낮고 피합병대상기업의 Q가 높으면 합병성과가 높게 나타난다는 경향을 관찰할 수 있었다. 이러한 연구결과는 경영성과가 좋은 합병제의기업이 대체적으로 이득을 보지만, 경영이 부실한 피합병대상기업을 인수할 때 더 많은 이득을 본다는 Lang, Stulz, Walkling(1989)의 연구결과는 상반되는 것이다. 또한 경영성과가 나쁜 기업을 합병함으로써 보다 많은 합병가치 창조가 가능하다는 Servaes(1991)의 연구결과와도 상반되는 것이다. 이러한 상반된 결과는 우리나라 현실에서 합병이 대개는 계열그룹내, 또는 지배회사와 피지배회사간의 합병이 주류를 이루고, 세법상 합병기업의 손실은 승계되지만 피합병기업의 손실은 승계되지 않으므로 형식상 합병제의기업과 피합병대상기입이 뒤바뀌는 경향이 많다는 점에서 그 원인을 추정할 수 있다.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.25-42
• /
• 1995

본 연구에서는 기업인수 합병공시 전후에 관찰되는 매수 매도가격차이중에서 정보비용부분의 움직임을 살펴봄으로써 정보비대칭하의 시장미시구조이론을 검증하였다. 공시일을 예측할 수 없는 기업인수 합병공시를 대상으로 함으로써 효율적시장가설의 검증을 병행하는데 본 연구의 의의가 있다. 검증의 결과는 시장미시구조이론과 효율적시장가설을 지지한다. 공시전 전체기간에 대한 분석에서는 스프레드의 증가가 없었으나 부분기간에 대한 분석에서 스페셜리스트가 스프레드를 증가시키는 것을 확인하였다. 스프레드의 증가는 공시 3일전과 4일전에 나타났으며 이는 정보거래자에 대한 손실을 피하기 위하여 스프레드를 증가시킨다는 이론의 예측과 일치하는 증거이다. 그러나 정보누출과 이의 감지에는 시간차이가 존재하였다. 우호적공개매수와 적대적공개매수의 비교분석에서도 기업인수의 실현여부와 관련된 정보비대칭 현상에 대해 이론의 예측과 일치하는 결과를 얻었다.