• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.39 no.4
• /
• pp.97-120
• /
• 2008

Evaluation indicators reflecting recent digital environments are needed as a tool to increase research library's competitiveness and productivity. Especially, research libraries have different subject backgrounds and there are many one-person libraries. In this study, we developed new evaluation indicators based on the draft indicators made in 2007 considering these environmental elements so that it may be used easily and applicable to various research libraries. In developing the new indicators, we reviewed other library type's indicators and listened carefully to the comments from expert librarians in the research libraries through several meetings. After developing the indicators, we made a survey in order to verify its validity as well as its effectiveness and also made a test evaluation for research libraries. The proposed indicators will contribute in evaluating the current level of Korean research libraries and promoting them to the future-oriented libraries.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.14 no.7
• /
• pp.3528-3537
• /
• 2013

Evaluation indices of the panelizing optimization for Architectural freeform surfaces are proposed for quantitative evaluation through the case studies on panelizing optimization and evaluation index for Architectural freeform surfaces. Proposed evaluation items are adherence to original design intent, production ease, and continuity. The evaluation index for adherence to original design intent is surfaces fitness, the evaluation indices for production ease are planarity, planar panel ratio, and the evaluation indices for continuity are tangent continuity, and divergence. Algorithms are also suggested to compute the proposed evaluation indices.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.210-217
• /
• 2019

This research examines whether the evaluation index used Dream Start services operation evaluation has 'reliability in evaluation field and area' and 'whether there is discrimination according to evaluation index'. To do this, we conducted an empirical analysis based on the evaluation data of 126 municipal and provincial governments that received the 2018 Dream Start services operation evaluation. First, as a result of examining whether there is trust in each evaluation area, it was found that the reliability of the basic construction, integrated case management, and service operation field is higher than .6 and the lower evaluation indexes are the same Standards were met. However, the field of resource exploit and connectivity was not so reliable as the concept of sub-domains. Second, 'Are there discriminatory power according to the evaluation indexes?' The results showed that 18 of the 28 indicators were highly discriminative. On the other hand, 10 indicators showed low discrimination power.

• The Journal of Korea Institute of Information, Electronics, and Communication Technology
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.292-300
• /
• 2023

This paper proposes a patent discovery method and strategy for Generative AI-related patents by utilizing qualitative evaluation indicators established based on the core components of the technology. Currently, the evaluation of patent quality relies on quantitative indicators, but existing quantitative indicators cannot represent the characteristics of Generative AI technology, making it difficult to accurately evaluate. Therefore, there is a need for additional qualitative indicators that consider technical characteristics based on patent claims, which can reveal the actual strength of the patent. In this paper, we propose a new evaluation index considering the technical characteristics of Generative AI. Core patents were selected using the proposed evaluation index, and the appropriateness of the proposed index was verified through the existing quantitative evaluation method for the selected core patents.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.41 no.3
• /
• pp.133-154
• /
• 2010

With the introduction of new teacher evaluation system, teacher librarians' evaluation indicators and questions were presented for the first time. The purpose of this study is to review the validity of current indicators and questions and to develop new one, based on it. The result is as follows : Current indicators mainly focus on the management of school library facility and collection, not on teacher librarians' educational activities and have the low validity to evaluate the expertise of teacher librarians. As a result, this study will suggest new evaluation indicators and questions to evaluate their expertise appropriately.

• Proceedings of the Technology Innovation Conference
• /
• 2009.02a
• /
• pp.649-662
• /
• 2009

일반적으로 기술평가는 무형의 기술을 대상으로 그 기술의 기술성, 사업성, 시장성을 검토하여 기술을 금액, 등급, 점수, 의견 등으로 표시하는 평가활동으로 정의할 수 있으며(Cordon, 1994), 평가목적에 따라 다양한 기술평가유형이 존재한다. 최근 기술의 사업화가 선진경제구현의 핵심 매커니즘으로 부상함(박종복, 2008)에 따라 성공적인 신기술 사업화의 선행절차로서 기술평가가 필요하다고 할 수 있다. 일반적으로 신기술의 사업화 관련 선행연구 및 그것을 추진하는 기관들은 기술의 기술성과 사업성을 중심으로 신기술을 평가하고 있다. 하지만, 현재까지의 신기술 사업화 목적의 기술평가와 관련한 선행연구는 기술성과 사업성의 균형 있게 평가하지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 신기술의 평가를 위해 기술의 기술성과 사업성을 동시에 고려할 수 있는 기술평가지표를 개발하였다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.10
• /
• pp.90-102
• /
• 2021

Technology evaluation is to assess the ability of technology commercialization entities to generate profits by using the subject technology, and domestic technology evaluation agencies have established and implemented their own evaluation systems. In particular, the recently developed technology evaluation model in the fields of marine and fishery does not sufficiently reflect the poor environment for technology development compared to other industries, so it does not pass the level of T4 rating, which is considered appropriate for investment. This is recognized as a challenge that occurs when the common evaluation indicators and evaluation scales used in other industries, and when the scoring system for T1 to T10 grading is similarly or identically utilized. Therefore, through this study, we intend to secure the appropriateness and reliability of the results of the comprehensive rating calculation by developing technology evaluation models and indicators that well explain the nine marine and fisheries industry classification systems. Based on KED and technology evaluation case data, AHP-based index weighting and Monte Carlo simulation-based rating system are applied and the results of case studies are verified. Through the proposed model, we aim to enhance the usability of R&D and commercialization support programs based on fast, convenient and objective evaluation results by applying to upcoming technology evaluation cases.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2004.05a
• /
• pp.67-70
• /
• 2004

카플란과 노턴에 의해 1992년에 처음 소개된 BSC (Balanced Scorecard)의 '재무', '고객', '내부프로세스' 그리고 '학습과 성장'의 4개 시각 중 '학습과 성장' 시각의 핵심성과지표를 도출하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이다. 기존 연구에서 제시된 평가 지표의 한계점을 제시하고 성과지표 도출의 근원을 조직 행동론에서 제시하고 있는 성과개념과 과정이론에서 밝혀냄으로서 '학습과 성장'시각의 목표인 다른 세 시각의 하부구조 및 동인을 달성하고자 조직 행동이론 관점의 핵심성과지표를 제시하고자 한다. 또한 정보기술이 기업의 장기적인 역랑을 배가시키고 경쟁우위를 확보하기 위한 전략적 수단으로 인식됨에 따라 정보기술의 역할 및 효과성에 대한 측정과 평가가 중요한 이슈로 떠오르고 있기 때문에 '학습과 성장' 시각에서 인적자원의 역랑과의 균형있는 정보기술 역량을 측정하고 평가할 수 있는 지표를 제시하고자 한다. 이는 기업 경영활동의 근간이 되는 구성원과 단위조직, 그리고 정보기술이 기업성과데 미치는 영향을 정확히 파악하고 그 결과를 구성원과 조직의 보상체계로 연결시킬 수 있는 객관적인 잣대로서 작용하게 된다.

• Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.1095-1136
• /
• 2012

The study demonstrated the pre-feasibility evaluation of the new agricultual technology R&D project and the ways to improve it. The study created new criteria for pre-feasibility evaluation based on the results acquired from the examination and analysis of pre-feasibility evaluation systems and criteria of various institutions at home and abroad in order to understand the current state of the evaluation method conducted by the Rural Development Administration and to seek ways for its improvement. The new criteria include indices for technicity, marketability, and feasibility. Based on these, questionnaires were prepared and the answers on them were statistically analyzed to set weights between indices. It was found that feasibility appeared the highest, in particular, feasibilities related to budget appropriateness, novelty, possibility of demand for the technology, and potential of commercialization appeared high. Referring to this conclusion, a simple operation process of pre-feasibility evaluation was introduced in the study.

• Journal of Industrial Convergence
• /
• v.20 no.12
• /
• pp.87-96
• /
• 2022

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has also been promoting the commercialization of land transport technology to commercialize the technologies owned by small and medium-sized venture companies, and to support the transfer and commercialization of public technologies. At this point, in order to improve the investment effect of subsequent new projects and to select excellent research institutes, it is necessary to establish a valid evaluation index system suitable for the purpose of the project. The evaluation index system for subsequent new projects should be linked to the project objectives and goals of the preceding project, and should be selected in consideration of existing evaluation indicators to prevent interruption of research results. Therefore, this thesis sets the evaluation index system into multiple scenarios through hierarchical cluster analysis using the evaluation result data for each evaluation committee for small and medium venture companies participating in the land transportation technology commercialization support project, and then analyzes the structural equation model. As a result of scenario analysis, considering the measurement effect of each path representing the causal relationship between evaluation indicators and the effect of each evaluation index on evaluation items, the scenario with the highest impact on the evaluation result was selected as an improvement plan.