• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.461-483
• /
• 2017

The ability to think mathematically and to reason inductively are basics of logical reasoning and the most important skill which students need to acquire through their Math curriculum in elementary school. For these reasons, we need to conduct an analysis in their procedure in inductive reasoning and find difficulties thereof. Therefore, through this study, I found parts which covered inductive reasoning in their Math curriculum and analyzed the abilities and characteristics of students in solving a problem through inductive reasoning.

• Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.51-63
• /
• 2001

In supervised machine learning, an induction algorithm, which is able to extract rules from data with learning capability, provides a useful tool for data mining. Practical induction algorithms are known to degrade in prediction accuracy and generate complex rules unnecessarily when trained on data containing superfluous features. Thus it needs feature subset selection for better performance of them. In feature subset selection on the induction algorithm, wrapper method is repeatedly run it on the dataset using various feature subsets. But it is impractical to search the whole space exhaustively unless the features are small. This study proposes a heuristic method that uses sensitivity analysis of neural networks to the wrapper method for generating rules with higher possible accuracy. First it gives priority to all features using sensitivity analysis of neural networks. And it uses the wrapper method that searches the ordered feature space. In experiments to three datasets, we show that the suggested method is capable of selecting a feature subset that improves the performance of the induction algorithm within certain iteration.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.81-94
• /
• 1988

본 연구의 목적은 Piaget의 인지발달단계(전조작 구체적 조작 단계)에 따른 자연과 개념획득에 효과적인 교수전략을 탐색하기 위한 연구로서, 첫째는 문헌연구를 통해서, Piaget의 인지이론을 기초로한 교육론과 개념학습을 위한 교수전략을 연구함으로써 전조작 단계의 어린이, 구체적 조작단계의 어린이에게는 연역적 교수전략보다 귀납적 교수전략이 더 효과적이며, 구체적 조작단계의 어린이에게는 초보적인 논리능력이 발달하므로 연역적 교수전략도 가능하며, 이 2가지의 인지단계가 복합돼 있는 국민학교 2학년 집단에게는 귀납적 교수전략이 보다 효과적일 것이라는 데에 이르렀다. 둘째로는 현장 실험연구로서 실제로 자연과 2학년의 한 단원을 연억 귀납의 교수전략의 단계에 맞추어 적용하였다. Piaget의 인지 발달 단계예 따른 자연과 개념획득을 위한 효과적인 교수전략을 탐색해본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 전조작 단계의 아동은 자연과 개념획득을 위해서는 연역적 교수전략보다 귀납적 교수전략이 더 효과적이다. 둘째, 구체적 조작단계의 아동에게는자연과 개념획득을 위한 교수전략은 귀납적 교수전략이 효과적이지만, 연역적 교수전략도 가능하다는 것이다. 이로써 국민학교 2학년 즉, 전조작 단계와 구체척 조작단계가 복합돼있는 집단에게는 연역적 교수전략보다 귀납적 교수전략이 보다 더 효과적이라는 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2002.04a
• /
• pp.703-705
• /
• 2002

정보의 급속한 확산과 더불어 체계적이고 효율적으로 정보를 분류하고 활용할 수 있는 방법에 대한 연구의 필요성이 증대되고 있다. 생물정보에 있어서도 기존에 축적된 많은 정보뿐만 아니라 새로 밝혀지는 정보들을 자동적으로 분류하고 재활용하는 방법의 일환으로 귀납적 논리 프로그래밍을 적용한 방법론이 채택되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 귀납적 논리 프로그래밍을 이용하여 단백질 구조 분류 데이터베이스론 생성하고 이를 기반으로 단백질 폴더에 내재된 공통의 규칙들을 발견하고, 새로운 단백질에 적용하여 구조를 예측할 수 있는 방법론에 대하여 기술한다.

• Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 1998

귀납적 학습방법들의 분류성능을 비교 평가하기 위하여 대표적 분류문제의 하나인 신용평가 문제를 사용하였다. 분류기로서 사용된 귀납적 학습방법론들은 통계학의 다변량 판별분석(MDA), 기계학습 분야의 C4.5, 신경망의 다계층 퍼셉트론(MLP) 및 Cascade Correlation Network(CCN)의 4 가지이며, 학습자료로는 국내 3개 신용평가기관이 발표한 신용등급 및 공포된 재무제표를 사용하였다. 신용등급 예측의 정확도에 의한 분류성능을 평가하였는데 연도별 평가와 시계열 평가의 두 가지를 실시하였다. Cascade Correlation Network이 가장 좋은 분류성능을 보였지만 4가지 분류기들 사이에 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 발견되지 않았다. 이는 사용된 학습자료가 갖는 한계로 인한 것으로 추정되지만, 성능평가 과정에 있어 학습자료의 전처리 과정이 분류성과의 제고에 매우 유효함이 입증되었다.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.19-20
• /
• 1970

이 논문에서는 거리공간 R가 가산적인 차원이 될 필요한 조건을 얻었으며 다음에는 거리공간 R가 가산개의 개집합에 의하여 덮어지고 각 개집합이 강한 귀납적 차원이 n 이하면 R의 강한 귀납적 차원도 n 이하이다.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.85-107
• /
• 2012

Problem solving is important in school mathematics as the means and end of mathematics education. In elementary school, inductive reasoning is closely linked to problem solving. The purpose of this study was to examine ways of improving problem solving ability through analysis of inductive reasoning process. After the process of inductive reasoning in problem solving was analyzed, five different stages of inductive reasoning were selected. It's assumed that the flow of inductive reasoning would begin with stage 0 and then go on to the higher stages step by step, and diverse sorts of additional inductive reasoning flow were selected depending on what students would do in case of finding counter examples to a regulation found by them or to their inference. And then a case study was implemented after four elementary school students who were in their sixth grade were selected in order to check the appropriateness of the stages and flows of inductive reasoning selected in this study, and how to teach inductive reasoning and what to teach to improve problem solving ability in terms of questioning and advising, the creation of student-centered class culture and representation were discussed to map out lesson plans. The conclusion of the study and the implications of the conclusion were as follows: First, a change of teacher roles is required in problem-solving education. Teachers should provide students with a wide variety of problem-solving strategies, serve as facilitators of their thinking and give many chances for them ide splore the given problems on their own. And they should be careful entegieto take considerations on the level of each student's understanding, the changes of their thinking during problem-solving process and their response. Second, elementary schools also should provide more intensive education on justification, and one of the best teaching methods will be by taking generic examples. Third, a student-centered classroom should be created to further the class participation of students and encourage them to explore without any restrictions. Fourth, inductive reasoning should be viewed as a crucial means to boost mathematical creativity.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.6
• /
• pp.839-851
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze the science reasoning differences of elementary school students' science writing. For this purpose, science writing activities and analysis frameworks were developed. Science writing data were collected and analyzed. Third to sixth grade elementary students were selected from a middle high level elementary school in terms of a national achievement test in Seoul. A total of 320 writing materials were analyzed. The results of the analysis were as follows. Science writings show science reasoning at 52 % for $3^{rd}$ grade, 68% for $4^{th}$ grade, 85% for $5^{th}$ grade, and 89% for $6^{th}$ grade. Three types of scientific reasoning such as inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning, and abductive reasoning appeared in science writing of the third to sixth graders. The abductive reasoning appeared very low in comparing with inductive and deductive reasoning. Level three appeared the most frequently in the science writing of the elementary students. The levels of inductive and deductive reasoning in science writing increased according to increasing grade and showed statistical differences between grades. But the levels of abductive reasoning did not show an increasing aspect according to increasing grade and also did not show statistical differences between grades. The levels of inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning of the 3rd grade was very low in comparing with the other grades.

• Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
• /
• v.22 no.5
• /
• pp.575-583
• /
• 2018

This study approached EPL learning with deductive teaching and learning methods and inductive teaching and learning methods which are grammar teaching and learning methods. In the entry site, lectures provided for elementary school students in grades 5 to 6 were set as deductive learning courses. Based on this, inductive learning process was developed and each learning process was composed of 12 periods. After conducting the research, EPL utilization evaluation, learning satisfaction and immersion test were conducted between the two groups. It was difficult to obtain statistically meaningful results between the two groups. However, in the three tests, the mean value of groups using inductive teaching and learning methods was high. If we construct a long-term learning process and conduct research, we think that statistically meaningful results are produced between the two groups.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.19 no.9
• /
• pp.307-316
• /
• 2021

This study aims to explore the effects of deductive FFI and inductive FFI in L2 learners' grammatical achievement and their reaction to the grammar instruction. 84 students were placed into three groups: 29 given deductive FFI(DG), 28 receiving inductive FFI(IG), and 27 with traditional instruction(CG). All students completed pre/post tests and questionnaires, and took a delayed post test 9 weeks after the treatment. For statistical anlayses of all the quantitative data, a one-way ANOVA, paired samples T-test, and repeated measures ANOVA were performed. The results indicated that both deductive and inductive FFI affected learners' grammatical achievement and their achievement was sustained over time. Deductive FFI was more effective than inductive FFI, whereas the IG students more positively changed their attitudes and perceptions to the grammar instruction. These findings of the study imply that FFI should be valued in an Korean EFL classroom, which would contribute to further longitudinal research for its sustainability.