• Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association
• /
• v.14 no.8
• /
• pp.353-379
• /
• 2020

The 2032 South-North Joint Olympics is an agreement between the two Koreas. Through this, various efforts are needed to improve new inter-Korean relations and co-prosperity on the Korean Peninsula. The purpose of this study is to proceed with the 203 South-North Joint Olympics. This study was developed by literature reserch methods. The result of this study are as follows. First, Seoul-Pyongyang soccer exchange game will be promoted. Second, the International Peace Cup a relay race(Marathon) will be held. Third, Korea Peace Cup International Table Tennis Championships will be held. Fourth, I propose holding the Korea Sports Science Forum. Fifth, about 16-17 events are propose for North Korea to host the 2032 South-North Joint Olympics. Sixth, the decision to host the 2032 Summer Olympics is expected in 2022 or 2023. Seventh, it is necessary to promote the Inter-Korean Social Association cultural Exchange and Cooperation Committee or the Special Committee for the Promotion of the Inter-Korea Sports Exchange and Cooperation. Eighth, it is necessary to implement a five-year plan to promote Inter-Korea sports Exchange Cooperation or a five-year plan for Inter-Korea sports Exchange and Cooperation. Ninth, the North Korea player registration system will be promote to the South Korean K-1 League. Ten, suggest sports exchange and cooperation ahead of time. Eleventh, train experts on North Korean sports or exchange and cooperation. Finally, the South-North Korea sports exchange Agreement will be promoted. It also promotes the Inter-Korea sports Exchange and Cooperation Support Act.

• The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.43-46
• /
• 1973

이 논문(論文)은 1969년(年) 9월(月) 부터 시작된 IAEA, Internal Society of Hematology 후원(後援)인 ICSH(International Committee for Standardization of Haematology 주최로 열린 제5차 ICSH Panel에서 거론된 Ferrokinetics에 관한 몇 가지 문제점을 초록한 것이다. 1973년 11월 19일 IAEA/ICSH는 Ferrokinetics의 수기(手技)상의 문제점에 관한 토론이 있었다. 즉 혈청철(血淸鐵)이나 총철결합능(總鐵詰合能)을 검사용 혈액 채취시마다 매번 측정해야 되는지에 관한 문제, 환자(患者)의 총철결합능(總鐵詰合能)이 낮을 때 $^{59}Fe$를 주사(注射)하기전 직업적 공혈자(供血者)의 혈장(血漿)과 미리 incubation한 후 주어야 하는지의 문제, 검사용 혈액채취시 그 혈액양, 주입하는 방사성동위원소의 양(量), 항응고제(抗凝固劑)로 Heparin 대신 ACD를 사용할 수 있는지 여부, 통상(通常)의 주사기(注射器)를 사용할 때 그 오차를 줄이는 방법에 관한 문제 방사능(放射能) 계측시(計測時) 혈장(血漿) 대신 전혈(全血)을 사용채도 좋은가에 관한 문제점등이 토론되었다. 여기서 대체로 의견이 일치된 점으로는 주입(注入)하는 $^{59}Fe$는 비방사능(比放射能)이 $5{\mu}Ci/{\mu}g$이상일 것, 이의 양(量)은 체중당(體重當) 얼마로 표시할 것, 방사능계측(放射能計測)에 사용되는 혈액(血液)은 반드시 혈장(血漿)으로 통일할 것, 혈청철(血淸鐵)의 측정(測定)에는 첫번째 및 네번째의 검사용 혈액(血液)을 사용할 것, 혈액(血液)채취후 즉시 혈장(血漿)을 분리(分離)하여 보관할 것, 등(等)에 의견을 모았으며 앞으로 이에 관한 상보(詳報)를 마련하기로 하였다.各) 검사(檢査)에서 계산(計算)된 측정치(測定値)에 차이(差異)가 있어 그 결과(結果)의 해석(解釋) 및 비교(比較) 검토(檢討)에 적지않은 난점(難點)이 생겨 표준화(標準化)된 공통적(共通的)인 방법(方法)의 사용(使用)이 중요(重要)하다는 사실(事實)이 인식(認識)되게 되었다. 1966년(年) 호주(濠洲)의 Sydney에서 개최(開催)되었든 제11차(第11次) 국제혈액학회(國際血學會)때 열린 제4차(第4次) International Committee for Standardization in Haematology(ICSH)에서 Diagnostic Applications of Radioisotopes in Haematology에 관(關)한 expert panel을 갖을것을 의결(議決)하여 다음과 같은 12명(名)의 위원(委員)이 결정(決定)되었으며 위원회(委員會)의 의장(議長)에 Dr. Szur, 총무(總務)에 Dr. Glass가 각각(各各) 선임(選任)되었다. 그간(間) 1967년(年) 영경(英京) London에서 첫 회합(會合)이 있은후(後) New York, Vienna(IAEA후원(後援)) Brthesda(NIH후원(後援))에서 전문위원회(專門委員會)를 갖고 적혈구수명측정법(赤血球壽命測定法)에 관(關)한 의견(意見)의 일치(一致)를 보았다. ICSH와 국제혈액학회(國際血學會)에서는 이번에 결정(決定)된 적혈구수명측정법(赤血球壽命測定法)을 널리 소개(紹介)하며, 측정법(測定法)과 얻어진 결과(結果)의 해석(解釋)에 표준화(標準化)를 기(期)할 목적(目的)으로 이에 연관성(聯關性)있는 전문지(專門誌)에 게재(揭載)할 것을 요청(要請) 받었기에 이에 전문(全文)을 소개(紹介)하는 바이다. 이들은 방사성(放射性) chromium 법(法)의 모든 세부적(細部的)인 면(面)을 표준화(標準化)하고 있으며 그간(間) 가장 논란(論難)의 대상(對象)이 되었던,

• 프린팅코리아
• /
• v.7 no.8
• /
• pp.98-99
• /
• 2008

대한인쇄정보기술협회와 월간 인쇄계가 주최한 제4회 국제인쇄기술컨퍼런스가 지난 7월 11일 서울 소피텔앰배서더호텔에서 인쇄 및 관련업계 관계자 300여명이 참석한 가운데 열렸다. 이날 컨퍼런스는 오성상 신구대학 교수의 진행으로 이어졌다. '드루파 2008을 통해 본 인쇄산업시장의 전망'을 주제로 열린 이번 컨퍼런스에서 김진배 대한 인쇄기술협회 회장은 인사말을 통해 "4회째를 맞은 국제인쇄기술컨퍼런스는 인쇄 각 분야 전문가들의 경험과 노하우를 공유하고 전 세계 인쇄산업의 최신 기술과 정보를 교류하는 기회의 장으로 인쇄기술의 발전에 기여해 왔다"며, "지금 인쇄산업은 미디어와의 융합을 통해 새로운 가치를 창조해내고 있어 이제 더 이상 인쇄가 고전적인 가치에만 머물러 있지 않다는 것을 의미 한다"고 말했다. 김 회장은 이어 "인쇄산업은 기존의 수준에만 머물러 있어서는 안 되며 전 세계적인 변화의 추세에 발맞춰 철저한 준비와 노력이 필요할 뿐 아니라 새로운 비전을 찾을 수 있도록 인쇄산업인 모두의 지혜를 모으는 데 힘을 쏟아야 할 것"이라고 말했다. 이어진 인사말에서 안정웅 월간인쇄계 발행인은 "이번 제4회 국제인쇄기술컨퍼런스는 각 인쇄분야에 있어 더욱 깊은 기술동향 정보를 제공할 것이며 드루파 이후 향후 4년 동안 인쇄산업을 이끌어 나갈 제품과 그 기술들을 만나보고 향방을 점쳐보는 기회가 될 것"이라고 말했다. 홍우동 대한인쇄문화협회 회장은 축사를 통해 "대내외적인 어려움에 직면해 있는 인쇄업계가 어려움을 극복하기 위해 인쇄인은 물론 기자재 공급업체와 언론계, 인쇄단체가 하나 된 마음으로 난관 극복을 위한 지혜를 발휘해야 할 때"라며 "올해부터 발효되고 있는 인쇄문화산업진흥법에 근거해 인쇄문화산업진흥위원회가 활동하는 한편으로 대한인쇄문화협회를 중심으로 정부와 국회가 머리를 맞대고 인쇄업계 발전을 위한 대책을 마련하고 있으며 특히 인쇄종주국으로써 세계적으로 빛나는 우리나라의 인쇄문화 유산과 세계인쇄 사료를 한 그릇에 담을 수 있는 가칭 '세계인쇄문화박물관'건립을 추진하고 있다"고 말했다.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.35-59
• /
• 2018

Professor Bin Cheng said that outer space was res extra commercium, while the moon and the other celestial bodies were res nullius before the 1967 Outer Space Treaty(OST). However, Article 2 of the OST made the moon and other celestial bodies have the legal status as res extra commmercium, not appropriated by any country or private enterprises or individual person, but the resources there can be freely available, as those on the high seas. The non-appropriation principle was introduced to corpus juris spatialis internationalis. Whether or not the non-appropriation principle is binding for the non-parties of the OST, many scholars see this principle as an international customary law, even developing into jus cogens. Article 11(2) of the Moon Agreement(MA) reconfirms the nonappropriation principle of Article 2 of the OST, but it has much less effect than the OST because the MA binds only the 18 parties involved. The MA applies only to the moon and celestial bodies other than the Earth in the Solar System, the OST's application scope extends to the Galaxy because the OST has no such substantive enactment. As referred to in the 2015 CSLCA of USA or Luxembourg's Law of Space Resources, allowing individuals and enterprises run by other countries to commercially explore and utilize the space resources, the question may arise whether this violates the non-appropriation principle under Article 2 of the OST and Article 11 of the MA. In the case of the CSLCA, the law explicitly specifies that sovereignty, possessory rights, and judiciary rights to a specific celestial body cannot be claimed, let alone ownership. This author believes that this law respects the legal status of outer space and the celestial bodies as res extra commmercium. As long as any countries or private enterprises or individuals respect the non-appropriation principle of outer space and the celestial bodies, they could use, exploit it. Another question might be raised in the difference between res extra commercium on the high seas and res extra commercium in outer space and the celestial bodies. Collecting resources on the high seas and exploiting space resources should be interpreted differently. On the high seas, resources can be collected without any obstacles like fishing, whereas, in the case of the deep sea-bed area, the Common Heritage of Mankind principles under the UNCLOS should be operated by the International Seabed Authority as an international regime. The nature or form of the sea resources found on the high seas are thus different from that of space resources, which are fixed on the moon and the celestial bodies without water. Thus, if individuals or private enterprises collect these resources from outer space and the celestial bodies, they might secure a certain section and continue collecting or mining works without any limitation. If an American enterprise receives an approval from the U.S. government, secures the best location and collects resources on the moon, can other countries' enterprises access to this area? How large the exploiting place can be allotted on the moon? How long should such a exploiting activity be lasted? Under the current international space law, these matters might be handled according to the principle of "first come, first served." As a consequence, the international community should provide a guideline or a proposal for the settlement of any foreseeable disputes during the space activity to solve plausible space legal questions in the near future.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.22 no.10
• /
• pp.1398-1404
• /
• 2018

The Blockchain technology could represent a solution to unexpected problems. In modern society, the domain of value has become diversified. The Crypto currency would replace the area that conventional currency could not function. The Japanese government recognized the Bitcoin as an official currency from April 2017 through amendment of the Money Transfer Act in 2016, and has been leading the related regulation policy recently. This paper examines the policy strategy of the Japanese government that is leading the current policy related to the Crypto currency market. The sequence of this paper is as follows: Coordination Process of Japanese Government's Crypto currency Policy of Special Mission Committee on IT Strategy as a Coordinator, Amendment of the Fund Settlement Act and the Establishment of a Self-Regulation Organizations in Crypto currency and Japan's Crypto currency Taxation and Supplementary System.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.345-366
• /
• 2018

Article 37 of the International Convention on Civil Aviation requires that rules should be adopted to keep in compliance with international standards and recommended practices established by ICAO. As SARPs are revised annually, each ICAO Member State needs to reflect the new content in its national aviation Acts in a timely manner. In recent years, data-driven international standards have been developed because of the important roles of aviation safety data and information-based legislation in accident prevention based on human factors. The Safety Management System and crew Fatigue Risk Management Systems were reviewed as examples of the result of data-driven rulemaking. The safety management system was adopted in 2013 with the introduction of Annex 19 and Chapter 5 of the relevant manual describes safety data collection and analysis systems. Through analysis of safety data and information, decision makers can make informed data-driven decisions. The Republic of Korea introduced Safety Management System in accordance with Article 58 of the Aviation Safety Act for all airlines, maintenance companies, and airport corporations. To support the SMS, both mandatory reporting and voluntary safety reporting systems need to be in place. Up until now, the standard of administrative penal dispensation for violations of the safety management system has been very weak. Various regulations have been developed and implemented in the United States and Europe for the proper legislation of the safety management system. In the wake of the crash of the Colgan aircraft, the US Aviation Safety Committee recommended the US Federal Aviation Administration to establish a system that can identify and manage pilot fatigue hazards. In 2010, a notice of proposed rulemaking was issued by the Federal Aviation Administration and in 2011, the final rule was passed. The legislation was applied to help differentiate risk based on flight according to factors such as the pilot's duty starting time, the availability of the auxiliary crew, and the class of the rest facility. Numerous amounts data and information were analyzed during the rulemaking process, and reflected in the resultant regulations. A cost-benefit analysis, based on the data of the previous 10 year period, was conducted before the final legislation was reached and it was concluded that the cost benefits are positive. The Republic of Korea also currently has a clause on aviation safety legislation related to crew fatigue risk, where an airline can choose either to conform to the traditional flight time limitation standard or fatigue risk management system. In the United States, specifically for the purpose of data-driven rulemaking, the Airline Rulemaking Committee was formed, and operates in this capacity. Considering the advantageous results of the ARC in the US, and the D4S in Europe, this is a system that should definitely be introduced in Korea as well. A cost-benefit analysis is necessary, and can serve to strengthen the resulting legislation. In order to improve the effectiveness of data-based legislation, it is necessary to have reinforcement of experts and through them prepare a more detailed checklist of relevant variables.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.215-236
• /
• 2006

This article focused on the meaning of the 1979 Moon Treaty and its future. Although the Moon Treaty is one of the major 5 space related treaties, it was accepted by only 11 member states which are non-space powers, thus having the least enfluences on the field of space law. And this article analysed the relationship between the 1979 Moon Treay and 1967 Space Treaty which was the first principle treaty, and searched the meaning of the "Common Heritage of Mankind(hereinafter CHM)" stipulated in the Moon treaty in terms of international law. This article also dealt with the present and future problems arising from the Moon Treaty. As far as the 1967 Space Treaty is concerned the main standpoint is that outer space including the moon and the other celestial bodies is res extra commercium, areas not subject to national appropriation like high seas. It proclaims the principle non-appropriation concerning the celestial bodies in outer space. But the concept of CHM stipulated in the Moon Treaty created an entirely new category of territory in international law. This concept basically conveys the idea that the management, exploitation and distribution of natural resources of the area in question are matters to be decided by the international community and are not to be left to the initiative and discretion of individual states or their nationals. Similar provision is found in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention that operates the International Sea-bed Authority created by the concept of CHM. According to the Moon Treaty international regime will be established as the exploitation of the natural resources of the celestial bodies other than the Earth is about to become feasible. Before the establishment of an international regime we could imagine moratorium upon the expoitation of the natural resources on the celestial bodies. But the drafting history of the Moon Treaty indicates that no moratorium on the exploitation of natural resources was intended prior to the setting up of the international regime. So each State Party could exploit the natural resources bearing in mind that those resouces are CHM. In this respect it would be better for Korea, now not a party to the Moon Treaty, to be a member state in the near future. According to the Moon Treaty the efforts of those countries which have contributed either directly or indirectly the exploitation of the moon shall be given special consideration. The Moon Treaty, which although is criticised by some space law experts represents a solid basis upon which further space exploration can continue, shows the expression of the common collective wisdom of all member States of the United Nations and responds the needs and possibilities of those that have already their technologies into outer space.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.31 no.2
• /
• pp.215-236
• /
• 2016

This paper is related to a study on safety management of cosmic radiation in the aviation area, and as a comprehensive study encompassing not only aviation crew but also aviation traffic users, presents issues on an exposure to the cosmic radiation which authors predict may be intensified in a time to come. Although the government of the Republic of Korea has recently activated regulations related to the cosmic radiation, the following improvement measures are further urged to be carried out not only as a regulatory improvement for pushing ahead with effectiveness but also as a supplementary tool. Firstly, a dose limit corresponding to the international standard needs to be applied. Since the dose limit imposed by the Korean government is improperly higher than the international dose limit of the cosmic radiation, the present dose limit needs to be re-established in a range of "not exceeding the international recommendation". Secondly, a new methodology is needed such that aviation companies observe a yearly effective dose limit of passengers. A fact that only aviation crew is specified but passengers are excluded in the related regulation is based on a recommendation presented by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). According to the recommendation, Korean government excluded passengers in the "Cosmic Radiation Safety Requirements for Crew". Among the present aviation regulations, there exists a protection standard for protecting aviation traffic users. However, it presents a damage protection only for ticket-related issues. Since this regulatory weakness provides a cause of endangering national health, the authors believe that an improvement in the regulation is needed without sticking to the recommendation from the ICRP. To this end, new regulations are strongly demanded from aspects of not only legal but also regulatory areas. The dose limit in accordance with the international standard is established. However, at least a minute amount of cosmic radiation is continuously acting on all people of Korea. Since more and higher level of cosmic ration may exist in the aviation space, an improved method of representing the minute amount of cosmic radiation in figures. As a result, a desirable regulation may be established for protecting not only crew but also aviation traffic users from being exposed to the cosmic radiation via a legislation of the desirable regulation.

• Journal of Arbitration Studies
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.25-46
• /
• 2015

Cross-border consumer disputes are on the increase as cross-border trade between consumers and businesses continues to grow. Cross-border consumer disputes are difficult to solve, because there are different languages, laws and institutions between the parties. These consumer disputes can be solved more easily by Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in comparison with utilizing court processes. ODR is a branch of dispute resolution which uses technology to facilitate the resolution of disputes between parties. It primarily involves negotiation, mediation or arbitration, or a combination of all three. In this respect it is often seen as being the online equivalent of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). On 18 June 2013, the new legislation on Alternative Dispute Resolution and Online Dispute Resolution has been published - the "Directive on Consumer ADR and Regulation on Consumer ODR". The new legislation on ADR and ODR will allow consumers and traders to solve their disputes without going to court, in a quick, low-cost and simple way. The United Nations working group for online dispute resolution of cross-border electronic commerce transactions (UNCITRAL Working Group III) has been underway since 2010 to continue its work on procedural rules for ODR.

• Journal of the Korean Vacuum Society
• /
• v.15 no.4
• /
• pp.347-353
• /
• 2006

A helium permeation type standard leak calibration system has newly developed by using dynamic gas expansion method. The measurement range was extended lower to $10^{-6}$ Pa L/s for participating CCM (Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities) standard leak key comparison. For the system, pressure ratios of high and ultra-high vacuum chamber and porous plug conductance for helium gas were determined. By using the system, a permeation type standard leak of $5.6{\times}10^{-4}$ Pa L/s range was calibrated. The calibration result showed that the difference between standard commercial leak was 11.1 %.