• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.613-638
• /
• 2008

The Korean government established 'the Act on Performance Evaluation and Management for National Research & Development (R&D) Programs' in 2005, and one year later constructed a master plan, 'A Basic Plan for the Management and Utilization of R&D performance' that focused on better diffusing the public R&D outcomes. In this study we propose a model of performance monitoring, evaluation, and management system for national R&D, which is based on a systematic approach and the logic model that has been prevalently used in planning and evaluating the public programs, to meet the purpose of the law and the master plan as well as to facilitate the diffusion of national R&D outcomes focused mainly on the industrial application technology. Furthermore, in order to use the model for the several applications, the model's specific measures which includes the quantitative methodologies such as analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) are suggested in accordance with the existing system of the evaluation institution in Korea.

• Proceedings of the Safety Management and Science Conference
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.433-440
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 현재까지 주먹구구식, 각 부처별로 평가가 이루어져 왔던 해외취업사업을 통계적, 경영학적 기법을 적용하여 객관적으로 평가할 수 있는 방법에 대해 제안하고자 한다. 본 연구결과를 통해 국가적 차원에서 새로운 정책 발굴의 여지가 많은 청년층 국가 간 교류사업 즉 해외취업사업에 보다 조직적이고 체계적인 틀을 제시할 수 있는 전략을 제공한다. 해외취업사업은 국가 중요 정책사업이면서 형태가 구축되지 않은 비표준 정책으로 정책의 완성을 위해 현재 이루어졌던 사업에 관련된 과거 데이터를 기반으로 사업의 미래방향에 대해 제시할 수 있을 것으로 판단한다.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.77-90
• /
• 2013

This study is to seek measures for streamlining the evaluation system by analyzing the examples of advanced countries. This study was conducted, based on the relevant government policy documents and previous research papers, in the manner of comparing and analyzing the issues and cases regarding the government evaluation system of public-funded R&D programs in selected countries. In Korea, a national R&D performance evaluation system was introduced by law in 2006. In United States, Obama government has enhanced government performance management by signed into law the GPRA Modernezation Act of 2010. The Japanese Government issued a newly revised Guideline on National R&D Evaluation in late 2012. European Union has also been constantly updating its evaluation system for Framework Programmes(FPs) begun since 1984. This study gets some insights from the recent development of R&D evaluation in the other countries. It is important for the government R&D evaluation system to be in line with national S&T policy and agency's mission. In micro views, specific evaluation approaches and methods by types of various R&D programs should be more illustratively developed. Additionally it is suggested to monitor recent trends and techniques on R&D evaluation by participating in activities to communicate and share their knowledge and experiences in international evaluation research networks.

• 한국신재생에너지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.62-65
• /
• 2006

가스하이드레이트의 국내 부존 가능성이 확인됨에 따라 가스하이드레이트 개발기술 및 부존 정보의 확보를 위한 가스하이드레이트 연구개발사업이 추진 중에 있다. 가스하이드레이트 개발사업과 같은 국가주도 연구개발사업의 경우 사업의 타당성 확보와 효율적인 추진을 위해서 사업 및 개발기술의 가치를 객관적으로 평가해야 할 필요성이 높아지고 있다. 본 연구에서는 가스하이드레이트 개발사업의 가치평가를 위한 주요 속성들을 결정하고 속성별 쌍대비교를 통해 중요도를 도출 할 수 있는 Fuzzy AHP 방법론을 사용하여 상대적 가중치를 도출하였다 연구 결과 가스하이드레이트 개발사업 및 기술의 가치는 상위계층으로 직접가치와 유발가치로 나눌 수 있고, 하위계층으로 총 8개의 속성으로 분류 할 수 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 중요도 분석결과 가스하이드레이트를 직접 개발함으로써 얻을 수 있는 개발가치가 사업시행으로 인한 탐사개발 기술의 확보로 유발되는 가치보다 높은 중요도를 가지는 것으로 평가 되었다. 또한 개발가치의 세부항목 중에는 에너지 안보 증진 효과가, 유발가치의 세부항목 중에는 인력양성효과가 가장 중요한 가치평가 요소로 나타났다

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.494-512
• /
• 2010

Recently diversity of research field is emphasized all over the world. Nations with advanced programs in research field keep developing new R&D programs for interdisciplinary studies. These new research atmospheres need objective validity in evaluation process. Peer review is recognized as a best evaluation method for national research and development programs. However, peer review system has restrictive boundary because of its subjectivity of the reviewer. Scientometrics has been developed as an alternative system to peer review. But the effectiveness of quantitative indicators which also has qualitative aspect is rarely analyzed in real program evaluation. In this study, we suggest distribution of marks of peer review and newly developed quantitative review through analyzing deviations between two different reviews in real national R&D program evaluation. Moreover, we could have significant correlation between two review systems in the same case study.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.641-666
• /
• 2015

Recently, it becomes more important to carry out the feasibility study on government R&D projects since the amount of R&D funds increases. For this purpose, until so far the general framework on the preliminary feasibility study for government driven research projects has been built and modified, and well applied to several domains. However, there is still the limitation in applying the method of preliminary feasibility study to system development research projects. The system development research projects have many different features compared to general research projects, for example, long-period development, lots of stakeholder involvement, multi-disciplinary works, and so on. Considering these characteristics, it is necessary to improve the method for the preliminary feasibility study. In this vein, this study deals with looking into the improvement points of the preliminary feasibility study in terms of the application of the system development projects.

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.58-75
• /
• 2009

As practicalization and commercialization of the technologies invented from the national R&D(Research & Development) project has been emerging as an important issue, the need for a tool for R&D project management has been increased. Technology Readiness Levels model(TRL) has currently been used for R&D project management because it provides distinctive definition of the nine levels in the progress of technology development starting from the basic research level to the utilization level. However, it is difficult to adopt the model for a large-scale national R&D project in which multiple research projects are involved simultaneously. In addition, TRL demands evaluation of research projects done by relevant experts and offers no specific measures determining the level of technology development. This study uses Delphi method to develop the measurement system helping to determine technology readiness levels for the technologies invented in a large scale national R&D project. The proposed model includes definition and measurement scles for each level in TRL.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2016.10a
• /
• pp.330-345
• /
• 2016

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.29 no.2D
• /
• pp.175-181
• /
• 2009

Korean government has developed the 1st version of the National ITS Architecture in 1999 and utilized it as the framework for ITS planning, design, and standardization. The National Architecture now needs to be revised to accommodate environmental changes in ITS market and advancement of ITS core technologies. This study evaluates the current version of the architecture and suggests the directions for revision for a new national ITS architecture. The two most popular methodologies for architecture development-the process-oriented approach and the object-oriented approach-were reviewed, and the process-oriented approach was selected for new architecture development. The concept of the national architecture was then newly defined based on evaluation of the existing architecture. The new National ITS Architecture is suggested to be composed of ITS user services, logical architecture, physical architecture, and project architecture. This study must be followed by actual architecture development efforts and supporting policy actions for successful deployment of the new National ITS Architecture.

• Tunnel and Underground Space
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.43-51
• /
• 2002

한국원자력연구소에서는 80년대 말부터 1996년까지 저준위 방사성 영구처분 연구사업을 수행한 바 있으며 2000년부터는 국가원자력중장기연구개발사업의 일환으로 한국원자력연구소와 한국수력원자력주식회사가 동굴 처분 관련 안전성 평가 연구를 공동 수행하고 있다. 본 기술 보고에서는 그 동안 개발된 연구 개발 성과들을 중심으로 중저준위 방사성폐기물 처분장 장기 안전성 평가에서 고려되어야 할 요소들과 현재까지 정립된 안전성 평가 방안들에 관하여 정리하였다.