• Title/Summary/Keyword: 교육인증 프로그램

Search Result 189, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

A Case Study on the Higher Educational Institute Accreditation System in Australia TEQSA and Hong Kong HKCAAVQ (호주 TEQSA와 홍콩 HKCAAVQ의 고등교육기관 평가인증 사례분석)

  • Kim, Jung-Hee;Jeong, Jinchul;Lee, Hyunmin
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.28 no.3
    • /
    • pp.49-75
    • /
    • 2018
  • Qualitative management and certification of higher education and higher education programs are important in Australia and Hong Kong. The purpose of the study is to analyze the higher educational Institute accreditation in Australia and Hong Kong and to provide basic data for the domestic evaluation accreditation system For this purpose, the analysis was conducted based on the analysis framework of Kis(2005), which was modified by the researchers in Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency(TEQSA) and Hong Kong Council for Accreditation of Academic and Vocational Qualifications(HKCAAVQ). The quality assurance approach in Australia and Hong Kong is common as 'accreditation' and focuses on other evaluation methods, evaluation data, nature of the report, evaluation purpose, evaluation result, and follow-up evaluation. Australia and Hong Kong had separate evaluation agencies for accreditation of higher education qualifications, degrees, and educational programs, and were performing accreditation at the independent institutions. Australia and Hong Kong do not agree with the evaluation standards of higher education institutions because of different academic system and qualifications system from Korea. Higher education institutions need to consider international interchange in terms of exchanging higher education human resources between countries. It is also necessary to conduct evaluation of higher education institutions with reference to higher education quality management standards.

A Study of the Authentication of On-line Test Participants under e-Learning (e-Learning상에서 온라인 시험 응시자 인증에 관한 연구)

  • 조길익;곽덕훈
    • Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
    • /
    • 2004.04b
    • /
    • pp.499-501
    • /
    • 2004
  • 교육의 새로운 방향은 가상 학교나 WBI와 같은 교육적 활용분야로 확대되고 있으나, e-Learning 상에서 이뤄지는 평가의 응시자에 대한 신뢰 확보는 어려운 상황이다. 기존의 인증이란 사용자가 E와 Password를 타인에게 공개하지 않는 한 본인임을 인증하였다. 하지만 온라인상에서 시험 응시자는 본인의 ID와 Password를 타인에게 알려주어 대리시험이 가능하게 함은 물론 시험문제의 공유 또는 다수의 응시자가 한 곳에 모여 문제를 풀어 감으로서 평가에 대한 신뢰도에 의문을 갖지 않을 수 없게 되었다. 이에 인터넷으로 원격조정이 가능한 PC카메라와 얼굴인식 프로그램 그리고 원격제어프로그램을 이용하여 응시자를 인증함으로써 부정행위를 원천적으로 봉쇄하고, 감독자가 언제 어디서나 웹을 통하여 쉽게 감독할 수 있도록 LMS 기능의 보완이 요구된다. 본 논문을 통해서는 채팅기능을 통한 상호 대화가 가능하고 응시 장면을 동영상으로 압축 저장하여 사후 감독이 가능토록 함으로서 e-Learning상에서의 평가 및 학사관리의 공정성 및 신뢰도를 높일 수 있는 방안을 제시하였다.

  • PDF

A Study of Strategic Approach for Course and Program Outcomes Assessment (교과목 및 프로그램 학습성과 평가의 전략적 접근)

  • Kim, Cheong-Sig
    • Journal of Engineering Education Research
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.73-86
    • /
    • 2007
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest directions to improve engineering education and the assessment system of our country. For this object, the present situation of engineering education and assessment system in Korea have been reviewed and next, for those of study, the research papers and publications about the environment of college education are analyzed. Finally, an improved assessment system is suggested. It has already passed out for 6 years since execute the accreditation for engineering education in our country now, but essential point for step in accreditation for engineering education is how the evaluator can make the outcomes of studying. This is not a new terminology that is deformed according to special quality of college of engineering which prefer out-come based of study than process based of study to mean accomplishment in engineering education. The evaluation that estimate program is a skill, but an assessment method is not the meaning of individual student accomplishment also, it is the measure of validity estimation that should be estimate ability of students who complete program by proper authority. However, a new evaluation strategy that assess student outcome by person who consider the objectivity and validity, reliability should be develop for decision making of ABEEK. It is an original, private discussion for assessment strategy about the method for student learning outcomes assessment.