• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.21-29
• /
• 2010

International construction contractors are often faced with the situation of working in an unfamiliar construction environment. Under FIDIC rules, the contractor has the right to make a claim requesting the consulting engineer for an adjustment to the contract price or the time for completion when a part or parts of the works have changed, or in the event of unforeseeable conditions. Contractors generally have more access to the costs and time implications of such a change or unforeseeable conditions than the consulting engineer or outside neutrals. Due to such an asymmetry of information, the contractor may be motivated to dispute frivolous claims of less merit, expecting erroneous judgments by the consulting engineer or the neutrals. In this paper, a claiming behavior model is presented by using game theory and experience data to study the manner in which frivolous claims develop into disputes. The model also analyzes the impacts of DAB/DRB upon the frivolous claims.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.273-276
• /
• 2007

Construction work has character which claim or dispute is frequently raised. This means that each construction project has it's own contract documents due to the difference of environment and time. Therefore to overcome the associated risks, domestic contract rules and acts should be reformed. Several well-recognized contract documents developed by FIDIC, AlA, CMAA and general conditions of the contract is investigated and analyzed. Based on the research outcomes the direction of reformation is suggested.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.301-304
• /
• 2006

The insistence of rights and interests in contract is being generalized by opening in construction market which is following F.T.A, internationally. Conditions of contract in construction have different specialities compared with other industries. Different conditions of contract should be established because of a specific character that is different from each construction, such as work, environment, circumference conditions. Although the order of Turn-key is being expanded by increasing construction scale and demanding hybrid function, the suitable regulations of contract are not settled. As a result, various factors of claim is occurring in Change Order-Claim, because they just obey a part of guide-line. This study suggests useful solutions in detail concerned with the main factor of Change Order-Claim by each D/B phases through practical sorting and analysis of the causes of Change Order-Claim.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.103-110
• /
• 2009

A construction project consists of a variety of contracts for the completion of work. The large number of contracts involved in a single project increases the likelihood that disputes will arise between the parties involved regarding the terms of service. Actually, there are many disputes that are caused by a change 0 order. While such disputes should be settled by interpreting the terms stipulated in the agreement entered between the two parties, the process of dispute settlement is often restricted to arbitration and lawsuit, and as a result the parties tend to avoid it due to its inefficiency. For this reason, in Korea it is hard to find cases of interpreting terms of service, while in the U.S. it is easy to find diverse cases of interpreting terms of service, since there is a process of dispute settlement by each stage by the party who has placed an order. Therefore, this study presents analysis of case studies of contract changes, looking specifically at changes in the scope of the work, changes in quantity, changes in the period of implementation, changes in the method of implementation or attitude, changes in items provided by the government or the delivery place, and the acceptance of such change procedure by a contractor, and the adjustment of a reduction.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• no.10 s.195
• /
• pp.53-56
• /
• 2006

시공을 하다가 손해를 보았는데도 발주자 혹은 원도급업체에서 인정을 안해준다면 어떻게 해야 할까? "소송을 할까?", "다음 공사는 어떻게 해. 그냥 손해보고 말지 뭐", "아니야 그냥 넘어가기에는 너무 억울해" 설비건설업을 하다보면 누구나 한번쯤 이런 경험이 있었을 것이다. 이럴 경우 공정거래위원회에 문의 하거나 건설하도급 분쟁조정협의회에 문의하다가 정 안될 경우 소송에 돌입한다. 소송의 경우 대법원의 최종 판결이 나기까지 2~3년은 고스란히 걸림은 물론 소송비용도 만만치 않다. 이렇게 기간이 길지 않고 가격도 저렴하면서 해결 가능한 방법은 없을까? 물론 있다. 본지가 지난 7월부터 연재한 대한상사중재원과 건설하도급분쟁조정협의회, 공정거래위원회 등을 통해 해결 가능하다. 이번 호에는 그동안 게재되었던 건설분쟁시의 해결방안에 대한 총론으로 민사분쟁의 소송외적 해결제도 및 건설분쟁의 소송외적 해결제도, 건설공사 계약문서별 분쟁해결 조항에 대하여 게재한다.

• Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.3 no.1 s.9
• /
• pp.19-26
• /
• 2002

• Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.4-8
• /
• 2021

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.356-359
• /
• 2006

Dispute is construction itself. Serious difficulties ore occurred between contract parties when These disputes have occurred. Authority may fear the defective work if the requirement of contractor is fully reflected in the adjustment of contract. On the other hand the contractor may have fears that no payment or some payment of the extra work or the additional work done will be required. Therefore these problems must be resolved before these result in an enlarged riffle effect. To reduce the fear of the contract parties, ADR(Alternative Dispute Resolution) process were suggested.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.340-343
• /
• 2004

The purposes of this study is to survey unfair aspect of specific provisions in the construction contract. The research method of this stud)'includes judicial precedents and a questionnaier survey. The result of thus study are as follows: 1) unfair payment condition gives increase to faulty construction. 2) shift of the responsibility gives increase to delay, 3) adjusted contract sum gives increase inappropriate compensation to contractor.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.48-56
• /
• 2017

Construction Projects have many participants by characteristic, scale and contract. Those also have complicated communication structure. So, claim and dispute occur continuously for conflicting communication. In many claim and dispute cases, it usually occurs between builder and owner. Unfair practices by owners position cause main claim and dispute. This study analyses judgment type, cause and compensation ratio in korean commercial arbitration case and provides the dispute information for builder that has weak position by contract. It draws analysis information for managing and controlling dispute that order type, judgement type, cause and failure case. Using these analysis information, it hopes to help inducement of dispute agreement and save time and economic damage for builder during construction. It also hopes to rise construction completeness by providing dispute management information.