• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 2002

Utilizing information and knowledge is one of the major objectives in the management of construction firm. This trend has been developed both inside of the firms and overall industry-wise. Therefore conventional methods of performance evaluation based on the financial statements such as balance sheet under GAAP(Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) are not sufficient to cover various Performance of constriction firms. Core competency of construction firms needs to be evaluated by the new performance evaluation model. In this research, the concept of BSC (Balanced Score Cards) is utilized to develop the performance evaluation model for construction firms considering four major performance indicators including financial perspective, customer perspective, learn and growth perspective, anti internal business perspective. A model of performance evaluation including criteria is proposed to evaluate construction firms based on their vision and strategy.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.321-326
• /
• 2001

Current situations, such as IMF crisis, WTO agreement and decrease of construction market, demand changes to construction companies. To meet the situation, they focus on the value of the intangible assets to improve their competitive power. In Korea, Various institutes estimate the construction company in accordance with their Purposes. But their estimating method has limitations to know the potential value of the company because they don't much concentrate on characteristics of construction industry and intangible assets. This study was peformed to introduce the methodology of estimating intangible assets of company and to show the state of intangible asset of major construction companies in Korea. Market Capitalization Method(MCM) was used to calculate intangible assets and all data are based on Annual Business Report.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.233
• /
• pp.64-68
• /
• 2009

제조업과 유통업 등을 대상으로 했던 '한국서비스품질우수기업 인증'이 건설업 부문으로 확대되면서 건설업계의 관심이 커지고 있다. 서비스품질우수기업 인증제도는 기업 및 국가 경쟁력 제고와 소비자의 삶의 질 향상 및 권익보호를 위해 서비스 품질에 대해 이뤄지는 유일한 정부 인증으로 재단법인 키캄연구소(KICAM : 한국건설경영연구소)가 절차를 진행하고 지식경제부 기술표준원이 인증서를 발급해 준다. 2001년 시행된 이래 현재까지 800여 개 제조 유통업체 및 공공기업이 인증을 획득했고, 지난 9월부터는 고객서비스를 중시하는 건설산업 구조변화를 반영해 건설부문에도 시행됐다. 건설업 서비스품질 인증은 아파트 분양에서부터 입주, 사후관리까지 모든 단계의 사전 사후서비스 프로세스는 물론 서비스 품질문화 달성을 위한 리더십 등 추진력 부문, 고객만족 추진체계 등 시스템 부문, 서비스 경영성과 부문 등을 평가지표에 따라 종합 심사하게 된다. 특히 현장평가와 고객평가, 그리고 암행평가를 토대로 기술표준원 인증심사위원회에서 1000점 만점에 800점(중소기업은 700점) 이상을 획득한 기업에 한해 우수기업으로 인정해 준다. 건설업 서비스품질 인증제도에 대해 살펴본다.

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.263-272
• /
• 2008

In this study, we developed the web-based system evaluating the construction information level considering the characteristic of business of the construction company. According to the business, if a construction company answer to the information evaluation questions and inputs its information goal, the web-based system provides the construction information score and the comparative report to the result of companies which are the similar business type and scale. Moreover this system presents the information strategy to achieve company's information goal based on the present information level. This study will enable to a construction company to improve the level of IT in the construction industry and to increase IT investments.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.977-987
• /
• 2014

Since 1960's, international construction market have explosively increase and have reached up to 600 Bil. US$ through active participation of construction firms and steady support of government. Nevertheless, owners, clients and financial institutions required reasonable criteria to effectively assess the overseas business capabilities of construction firms. However, the existing methods for construction firms rarely considers the perspective of overseas business capabilities. To overcome these problems, this study proposes an evaluation system for overseas business capabilities of construction firms. First, the needs for new evaluation system is derived through FGI, and the direction of new evaluation system is presented by reviewing the limitations of existing methods. Also, the capabilities that are required for the performances for overseas businesses were analyzed through expert interviews. Finally, 31 primary evaluation indices consisting of 3 criteria - appropriateness of index, possibility of quantification, possibility of data gathering - are derived under 9 categories and 3 perspectives through surveys and consultation meeting. The preliminary investigation of 24 Korean construction firms are conducted for comparing the existing evaluation systems and to verify its applicability. The proposed method could provide a rational criterion to evaluate the construction firms, improve internal capacity of firms, and ultimately supports the success of the construction industry.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.438-441
• /
• 2002

Korean construction firms have been continuing investment of IT for last ten years. However, manager did not support a decision-making of IT because there is no evaluation and feedback system of IT investment. This study is a preceding research of making IT evaluation model as a part of MOCT(the Ministry of Construction and Transportation)'s construction CALS/EC policy and makes a basic frame through a trend and state of IT survey. As a result of survey, To encourage them, IT development to be balanced in each members for successful stabilization of CALS/EC as well as IT evaluation will be conducted in accordance with one's environment, such as a role and level of companies.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.118-126
• /
• 2016

International construction market have quantitatively increased and have reached up to 700 Bil. US$ through active effort of construction firms and government. In spite of this increase, substantiality issue has been constantly disputed due to qualitative problems such as lack of capability and technical shortage. To overcome these problems, many methods in performing quantitative growth and qualitative substantiality of overseas construction are being researched which showed that selection of subcontractors in general contractor is regarded as a very important success factor. However, it is difficult to make a reasonable decision for selecting the subcontractors due to the lack of evaluation standards and reliability. This study proposes an improved evaluation system through adjustment of the evaluation indicators using correlations analysis and multiple regression analysis with pre-qualification and performance evaluation of 121 firms in 6 countries.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.5 no.4 s.20
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2004

Credit evaluation by domestic financial institutions on Korean construction companies has had many problems with its tools and criteria ignoring the industrial characteristics. This study develops the DCiF(discounted cash inflow) model as a solution and discusses its usage in construction financing. It also examines the significance of the DCiF indices through regressions and statistical comparison with the other credit evaluation estimates. The results show its clear significance and consistent fitness. Based on the empirical results, implications and methodology are provided for the effective use of the indices in credit evaluation on the construction companies.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.3 no.4 s.12
• /
• pp.104-113
• /
• 2002

Knowledge Management(KM), represented as a way to sustain or gain competitive edge in domestic construction companies since late 1990s economic fluctuation, whose priority is to transform individual tacit knowledge into explicit organizational one. Also, accompanied by academic researches, they come to turn their interests on KM leveling and its results. However, they went too far to KM results without commenting what their KM capabilities are and where they should lead. Thus, this research work suggests a leveling model for KM, especially construction company, whose role is to diagnose which parts they should be encouraged or how to strengthen their present capabilities.

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.170-179
• /
• 2008

This study designed model that could scientifically and objectively evaluate a level of informatization of construction companies in consideration of informatization characteristics and limitations identified in researches related to the evaluation of informatization level of construction companies, so at to create the e-business environment for the construction companies including the enhancement of informatization consciousness and to improve capacity to carry out informatization. To do this, the study defined requirements to develop new model of construction informatization level and the characteristics of construction companies, and developed components of informatization level model and measuring methods that could meet the requirements based on theories and literature. The developed informatization level model were reviewed for validity and reliability through statistical method by carrying out the questionnaire survey on 200 companies along with an advisory group of experts. As the result of this study, we could suggest the directions for informatization to narrow the gap between the current level of informatization and the managerial goals in construction company.