• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.57-62
• /
• 2006

Giant cell tumors are potentially malignant tumors in vertebrae, affecting frequently difficult to diagnose and are often inoperable. So it will be treated using radiation because of their high recurrence rate and the mechanical compression of spinal cord, but many surgeons described tumors of the vertebra, and the affected vertebral body can be treated using radical or near to total excision, with anteroposterior vertebral fusion or instrumentation of the spine. we report a case of giant cell tumor affecting the third cervical vertebra which caused neck pain and destroyed the vertebra body had treated using radical excison with fusion of posterior arch using instrumentation of the spine together with a literature review.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.73-79
• /
• 2001

Giant cell tumor is usually found around the knee joint, especially in the distal femur or proximal tibia. Despite being classified as benign, it has unusual biological behavior of local aggressiveness and tend to have severely destructive lesion and develop rare pulmonary metastasis. Therefore, when the patient is presented to the physician with an expansile lytic lesion of challenging clinicopathologic entity extending to subchondral bone, the physician faces up to difficulties in treatment. We report a case of 25 years old patient having recurrent giant cell tumor in the right distal femur which developed metastasis to lung. The primary bone lesion was treated with local curettage and fillings with methylmethacrylate, but when he returned to the hospital two years later, the recurrence had developed with lung metastasis.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.7 no.4
• /
• pp.144-150
• /
• 2001

It is not uncommon for sarcomatous transformation of giant cell tumor of bone to occur after radiation, but osteosarcoma arising from giant cell tumor after surgical treatment is very rare and remains an aggressive form of sarcoma of bone with high mortality rate. We experienced 2 cases in whom a osteosarcoma developed long after benign giant cell tumor of bone was removed surgically from the same site. Malignant transformation was presented at 2 years 1 month and 9 years 8 months each after initial surgery. We describe our experience concerning clinical features, methods of treatment and outcomes of osteosarcoma arising from giant cell tumor.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.6 no.1
• /
• pp.30-34
• /
• 2000

Giant cell tumor of the small bones of the hands and feet is rare. Giant cell tumors in these locations develop at young age, are more commonly multifocal, and show the higher risk of recurrence than those at the end of the long bone. It should be differentiated from the other lesions of the hands, such as giant cell reparative granuloma, aneurysmal bone cyst and enchondroma. We experienced a case of giant cell tumor in the proximal phalanx of the left hand with swelling and pain. Curettage and bone graft were performed. Histologically large number of giant cells were distributed diffusely in the highly cellular stroma containing sheets of mononuclear cells. Secondary aneurysmal bone cyst and hemorrhage were associated.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.217-222
• /
• 2003

The giant cell tumor comprises approximately 5% of all bone tumors especially in the long tubular bones, particularly in proximity to the epiphysis. A rare case of giant cell tumor involving the patella was recently experienced by authors. Case summary with brief review of reference is presented.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.12-19
• /
• 2002

Purpose : Giant cell tumors(GCT) sometimes undergo malignant transformation after the radiotherapy, but very rarely do without radiotherapy. We reviewed the clinical experiences of the malignant transformation of GCT to suggest the guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of them. Materials and Methods : We examined four patients of pathologically proven malignant transformation of GCT, which occurred after the operative treatment alone without radiation, from September 1985 to January 2001. The mean follow-up period after the malignant transformation was 2.4 years(range, 1.3~4 years). Results : The mean time-interval from the initial diagnosis to the malignant transformation was 6.9 years(range, 2.2~13.5 years). The locations of tumors were soft tissues of proximal upper arm, proximal femur, distal femur and proximal tibia. The histology of malignant GCT was osteosarcoma in 3 cases and malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 1 case. Local recurrence developed in 1 patient and the pulmonary metastasis developed in 3 patients which transformed to osteosarcoma. Conclusion : Thorough sampling of the surgical specimen appears to be a very important factor for diagnosing the malignant transformation of GCT. In case of suspicion of malignancy in radiographs, the incisional biopsy should be followed by definite treatment rather than the improper resection.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.29-33
• /
• 2004

A giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal radius is not common. Curettage with bone cementation is considered as a treatment of choice but, in the case of recurrence, marked cortical disruption, or articular invasion, en bloc excision and reconstruction with proximal fibular bone graft is usual procedure. In reconstruction of en bloc resected distal radius which had recurred GCT after conservative operation, we used the ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner with intramedullary rod and bone cement, because the contamination was extent in previous operation and recurrence after fibular bone graft was fearful. This article introduce our new surgical procedure.

• Korean Journal of Head & Neck Oncology
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.14-17
• /
• 2013

Giant cell reparative granuloma(GCRG) is a non-neoplastic rapidly expanding and locally destructive tumor that occurs almost exclusively within the mandible and maxilla. A 58-year-old man, complained of a mass on the left infra-auricular area starting 2 months ago. The radiologic finding suggests a mass that originate from mandible, pathology diagnosed the lesion as a giant cell reparative granuloma. The tumor was surgically excised without complications. We report the case with a review of literature.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.43-49
• /
• 2013

Purpose: We analyzed the treatment outcomes of patients with sacral giant cell tumor. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 7 patients with giant cell tumor of the sacrum who were treated at out institution between 1990 and 2012. Results: There were 2 men and 5 women with mean age of 23.6 years. The average follow up was 52.3 months (range, 15-73 months). Six patients received surgical treatment. Intralesional curettage was performed for the 5 patients and marginal resection for another one patient. The remaining one patient was received radiation only. The patients who received radiation therapy and marginal excision had no residual or recurrent tumors. Of 5 patients with intra-lesional excision, one patient needs one more operation; two patients need two more operation for local control of the giant cell tumor. The remaining two patients failed to gain local control in spite of additional treatments. Conclusion: For the treatment of sacral giant cell tumor, intralesional resection can be one of the treatments option with minimal neurologic injury. Furthermore, radiation therapy can be recommended when complete excision or curettage is impractical.

• The Journal of the Korean bone and joint tumor society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.200-205
• /
• 2003

Purpose: To report our experiences of clinical features, treatment method and results of giant cell tumor of 5 patients in proximal fibula. Materials and Methods: Five patients managed with an en bloc resection preserving common peroneal nerve and lateral collateral ligament reconstruction with biceps femoris tendon followed up between January 1997 and July 2001. Preoperative plain radiograph and MRI and bone scan were checked. The recurrence of the tumor was judged by plain radiograph and clinical signs. Lateral instability of knee joint was checked during the outpatient follow-up. Results: The mean age of the patients at the time of operation was twenty- three (21-29). There were one male and four female patients. Dull pain was main symptom and palpable mass was seen in two patients. Peroneal nerve palsy and local recurrence were not observed except one case of temporary peroneal nerve palsy. During the outpatient follow up, one among 5 patients showed slight lateral instability and the other 4 patients showed no instabililty. Conclusion: Giant cell tumor in proximal fibula managed with an en bloc resection preserving common peroneal nerve and lateral collateral ligament reconstruction with biceps femoris tendon showed favorable results.