• Korean Journal of Adult Nursing
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.517-528
• /
• 2001

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 미국 아이오와 대학에서 개발된 Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)을 사용하여 신경기계 병동과 정형외과 병동에 근무하는 간호사들이 가장 빈번히 수행하는 간호중재를 파악함으로서 이러한 부서의 간호중재 리스트를 개발하는데 있다. 그리고 확인된 간호중재의 리스트를 미국 간호협회의 핵심 간호중재 목록과 비교함으로써 양국간의 간호중재의 유사성과 차이를 비교함으로써 한국간호의 발전을 도모하는데 있다. 방법: 8개의3차병원 및 종합병원 근무하는 간호사에게 NIC을 번역하여 소개한 뒤 가장 자주 수행하는 간호중재 30개를 선택하게 하였다. 선택된 간호중재는 빈도와 백분율 이용하여 분석하였고 미국의 핵심간호 중재목록과 영역(domain)별, 분류군 (class)별로 비교하였다. 결과: 신경기계 병동은 30개의 간호중재를 정형외과 병동은 34개를 핵심간호중재로 확인하였다. 한국과 미국의 간호중재를 비교해본 결과 신경기계 병동의 간호중재와 미국American Association of Neuroscience Nurses (AANN) 의 핵심간호중재 목록과는 단지 5개의 간호중재가 일치하였지만 정형외과 병동의 간호중재목록은 미국의 National Association of orthopaedic Nurses (NAON) 의 핵심중재목록과 27개의 간호중재가 일치되어 더 많은 유사성을 나타내었다. 두 나라의 간호중재를 영역(domain)별로 비교해보면 한국 간호사의 간호중재는 미국간호단체의 핵심간호 중재 목록보다 신체적 간호에 보다 많은 편중을 보였다. 결론: 한국간호사의 간호중재가 신체적 간호중재에 집중되어 있으므로 환자간호에 보다 전인적인 간호중재가 수행될 수 있도록 노력해야 할 것이다. 그리고 본 연구를 통해 개발된 핵심 간호중재 목록은 병원의 간호정보시스템을 개발하는데 사용될 수 있으며, 간호지식의 확장이나 staffing, 간호 수가화, 그리고 궁극적으로는 간호의 효과성 연구를 자극할 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Korea Multimedia Society
• /
• v.14 no.9
• /
• pp.1190-1201
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this research paper is to develop Mobile application-based Nursing Process Programs on 'Nursing Diagnosis', 'Nursing Interventions' and 'Nursing Outcomes Classification' targeting nurses and nurse students. To achieve it, this paper uses 'standard classification-focused research data' on the basis of Nursing Diagnosis Classification established by NANDA (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association), NIC (Nursing Interventions Classification) and NOC (Nursing Outcomes Classification) mainly developed by Iowa State University. The existing research methods are difficult to be applied to patients, since such methods put a restriction on choosing, developing, and generalizing 'Nursing Process Programs' in clinical spheres. But, this research thesis focuses on developing guidelines applicable to any clinical experiences, with the use of the framework in mutual links with all the nursing diagnosisoutcomes- interventions. In this regard, the Korean version programs were developed and registered in App store in March. Thus, it is expected that these programs would be wildly-available as tools for nursing education.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.33-71
• /
• 1998

본 연구의 목적은 한국의 간호사들이 행하는 간호중재를 규명하는 것이다. 연구대상은 한국의 2 병원에서 일하는 수 간호사와 평 간호사를 포함한 443면의 간호사이며, 연구도구는 Iowa Intervention Project Team 이 개발한 336 문항의 5점 척도로 이루어진 "간호중재"설문지를 사용하였다. 5점 척도는 다음과 같다 : (a) 거의 행하지 않는다 : (b) 거의 한달에 한번 행한다 : (c) 거의 일주일에 한 번 행한다 : (d) 거의 하루에 한 번 행한다 : (e) 하루에 여러 번 행한다. 한국자료를 위해 설문지는 본 연구자에 의해 한글로 번역되었고, Back-translation을 이용하여 한글로 번역한 설문지는 다시 bilingual nurse에 의해 영어로 옮겨졌고, 마지막으로 영어로 옮겨진 설문지를 원래의 영문으로 된 설문지와 비교한 후에(Equivalence Test) 수정${\cdot}$보완하여 사용하였다. 한국 간호사들은 336 간호중재 모두를 행하고 있으며, 21개의 간호중재가 적어도 하루에 한 번 정도는 이루어지고 있었다. 간호사들은 "생리적 : 복합영역"에 속하는 간호중재를 가장 빈번하게 행하였고, 이 중에서 "비경구적 투약"은 일주일에 거의 11번 정도로 가장 많이 행하여졌다. 가장 적게 행하는 간호중재는 "동물이용요법"이었다. 간호사들은 교육을 많이 받을수록, 임상경험이 많을수록 더 많은 간호중재를 빈번하게 행했다. 특히, 석사학위를 받은 간호사는 "행위 영역"에 속한 간호중재를 더 많이 행했는 데, 예를 들면 "적극적 경청", "적응 증진", "의사결정지지"등이다. 또한 4년제 대학을 졸업한 간호사들은 "생리적 : 복합영역"에 속한 간호중재들을 전문대학을 졸업한 간호사보다 더 많이 행했는 데, 예를 들면, "뇌부종 관리", "반사 장애 관리", "기구를 사용한 호흡"등이다. 10년 이상의 경험을 가진 간호사들은 "행위 영역"에 속한 간호중재를 임상 경험이 1년 미만이거나 또는 1-5년 사이의 경험을 가진 간호사보다 더 많이 행했는 데, 예를 들면, "죄책감 극복 증진", "진실 말하기"등이다. 또한 6-10년 사이의 임상경험을 가진 간호사들은 "자가 간호영역"에 속한 "옷 입히기", "두발 간호", "구강건강 유지" 등을 임상경험이 1년 미만인 간호사들보다 더 빈번하게 행했다. 이 연구는 간호중재 규명이 간호원가 산출을 위한 연구와, 간호의 질 향상을 위한 연구, 간호지식 탐구를 위한 연구에 공헌할 것을 기대한다.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.346-360
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this research was to identify nursing interventions performed by hospital nurses in Korea. The sample consisted of 311 nurses working in three hospitals. The Nursing Interventions Use Questionnaire developed by the Iowa Intervention Project team was used for data collection. The instrument was translated to Korean using the method of back-translation. Eighteen interventions were performed at least daily. Interventions in the Physiological : Basic domain were most frequently used at least daily. No interventions in the Family and Behavioral domains were used by nurses at least once a day. The most frequently used interventions was Documentation, followed by the interventions Medication : Parenteral, Intravenous(IV) Insertion, Temperature Control, and Shift Report. The intervention performed least often was Reproductive Technology Management. Nurses working in intensive care units on the whole performed interventions most often, while nurses working in obstetric, gynecological, and pediatric units performed them least often. The nurses working in intensive care unit, medical and surgical care units performed the interventions in the Physiological : Basic domain more often than the nurses working in obstetric, gynecological, and pediatric units. The nurses working in obstetric, gynecological, and pediatric units used the interventions in the Family domain more often than the nurses working in the other three units. This study contributes to the documentation of nursrs' work in Korea. Further study will be needed to validate nursing activities of each NIC intervention.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
• /
• v.36 no.2
• /
• pp.217-226
• /
• 2006

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify nursing interventions performed by public health nurses in health centers. Method: Data was collected by the taxonomy of Nursing Intervention Classification(NIC 3rd: 486 nursing interventions) from 131 public health nurses in health centers and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Result: As its result, more than 50% of public health nurses performed 137 nursing interventions at least monthly. The most frequently used intervention class was 'activity and exercise management', followed by 'physical comfort promotion', 'community health promotion', 'life span care', 'coping assistance', 'Self care facilitation', 'information management', 'nutrition support', 'community risk management' and 'patient education'. One hundred twenty nursing interventions were rarely performed by 90% or more of the nurses. Most of them were the physical complex domain. Conclusion: In conclusion, 137 interventions were performed by public health nurses at least monthly. NIC is helpful to build a standardized language for public health nursing.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.655-667
• /
• 2002

Purpose : This study analysis of nursing interventions and core nursing interventions performed orthopedic surgery care unit. Method : The data were collected from 55 nurses of 4 general hospital from July. 10, 2002 to Aug. 30, 2002. The instrument for this study was the Korean translation of 486 nursing intervention classifications developed by McColskey & Bulechek in 2000. In the 486 nursing interventions 350 nursing interventions were selected 8 among the 10 more than 5 years working group in orthopedic surgery care unit. Self frequency checking performed by 350 nursing interventions were used secondary questionnaire In the orthopedic surgery care unit nurses. Results : 1. The most frequently used nursing interventions domains were "Physiological : basic" and then "Physiological: complex", "Health system" "Behavior", "Family", "Safety". 2. Orthopedic surgery care unit core nursing interventions were performed several times a day by 50% or more of orthopedic surgery care unit and this result were 4 of domain, 11 of class, 26 core nursing interventions. This core nursing interventions were 5 of "Physiological : basic", 17 of "Physiological: complex", 1 of "Safety", 3 of "Health system" and have no "Behavior", "Family". Conclusion : This study analyzed nursing intervention of orthopedics and reestablished nursing intervention concept and I hope this study will be helpful for the nurse to be a professional by applying this to actual clinic, for development in qualified nursing and for establishment nursing information system.

• The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.72-85
• /
• 1999

The paper presents a review of three data sets(Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set, Nursing Minimum Data Set, and Nursing Management Minimum Data Set) and six major nursing classifications(the North American Nursing Diagnoses Association Taxonomy I, Omaha System, Nursing Interventions Classification, Nursing Intervention Lexicon and Taxonomy, Nursing Outcome Classification, Nursing Outcomes Classification, and Classification of Patient Outcome). The reviewed data sets and nursing classifications were different from each other in the purpose, structure, and user. Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcomes Classification were linked to North American Nursing Diagnosis Association, but others not. The data set and nursing classifications need to be linked to other data sets and classifications.

• Women's Health Nursing
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.275-284
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify nursing intervention performed by nurses on gynecological nursing units. Methods: The instrument in this study is based on the fifth edition of Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) (2008). Data was collected by Electronic Medical record from August, 2010 to October, 2010 at one hospital and analyzed by using frequencies in the Microsoft Excel 2010 program. Results: Of a total of 82 NIC, domains of the nursing interventions showed higher percentages for physiological: basic (36.3%) and physiological: complex (34.5%). The classes of nursing interventions showed higher percentage for health system medication (12.1%), perioperative care (10.0%), and drug management (8.6%). The most frequently used top interventions were Discharge Planning. The thirty least used interventions was environmental management. Top thirty most frequently used interventions belonged to the domain of physiological: basic (37.9%), physiological: complex (31.1%), and behavioral (5.4%). Conclusion: These findings will help in the establishment of a standardized language for gynecological nursing units and enhance the quality of nursing care.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
• /
• v.8 no.3
• /
• pp.361-372
• /
• 2002

Purpose : The purpose of study was to identify to analysis of core nursing interventions performed by Operating Room nurses. Method : The subjects of the study were arbitrarily selected nurses(n=104) working in Operating Room. The period for data collection was 15 days from July, 15, 2002 to July, 30. 2002. The instrument for study was 486 Nursing Interventions Classification developed by McClosky & Bulechek(2000) and was translated into Korean. In 486 nursing interventions, 57 nursing interventions were selected by more than half of 47 professional nurses group of Operating Room. 57 nursing interventions were used as a secondary questionnaire. In the secondary questionnaire, labels and definitions of all 57 interventions were listed. The collected data were self reported by Operating Room nurses. The data were analysed with SPSS program. Result : In 57 nursing interventions, the 'Behavior' domain was the most frequently used. Core interventions of Operating Room were performed several times a day by more than 50% of Operating Room nurses. Core interventions of Operating Room were 16 Core interventions, 7 classes, 5 domains. In the core interventions, the 'Physiological:Complex' domain was the most frequently used. Core interventions of Operating Room were Surgical Preperation, Infection Control:Intraoperative, Surgical Precautions, Fall Prevention, Documentation, Surgical Assistance, Environmental Management:Safety, Skin Surveillance, Physical Restraint, Pressure Ulcer Prevention, Environmental Management:Comfort, Infection Protection, Presence, Emotional Support, Specimen Management, Shift Report. Conclusion : Core interventions of Operating Room have implications for nursing care practice, nursing education, nursing research, and nursing information system in Operating Room.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.457-467
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this research was to identify nursing interventions performed by MICU and SICU nurses. For data collection this study used the taxonomy of the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC : 433 nursing interventions) which was modified by McCloskey and Bulecheck(1996). Each of the 433 interventions were identified as used by MICU and SICU nurses. More than 50% of the ICU nurses performed 280 nursing interventions at least monthly. Rarely used interventions included 26 nursing interventions in the childbearing care class. Overall, both MICU and SICU nurses used interventions in the Physiological : Complex domain most often on a daily basis and the interventions in the Family domain least often. The most frequently reported interventions as being used daily in the MICU were chest physiotherapy, airway suctioning and coughing enhancement and, in the SICU, documentation and airway suctioning. There were significant differences between MICU and SICU nurses in 17 nursing interventions childbearing care, cognitive therapy, communication enhancement, coping assistance, elimination management, lifespan care, health system mediation, immobility management, medication management, neurologic management, patient education, psychological comfort promotion, physical comfort promotion, respiratory management, risk management and information management. The SICU nurses performed there interventions more frequently than the MICU nurses. These findings will help in building of a standardized language for the MICU and SICU and enhance the quality of nursing care.