Browse > Article

Effects of Storage Methods on the Rhizome Quality of Rehmannia glutinosa L.  

김인재 (충청북도농업기술원)
김민자 (충청북도농업기술)
남상영 (충청북도농업기술)
이철희 (충청북도농업기술)
김홍식 (충북대학교 식물자원학과)
Publication Information
Food Science and Preservation / v.11, no.2, 2004 , pp. 282-285 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was carried out to investigate the cost reduction of rhizome through the stable storage of Jiwhang #1(Rehmannia glutinosa Libosch). The growth characteristics of Jiwhang #1 are different from those of local Rehmannia glutinosa L. varieties in Korea. Various storage methods was introduced and analyzed for 120 days. Among storage methods, changes in mean daily temperature in storage location were the least from 7.2 to 13.8$^{\circ}C$ in underground storage, while those were wide in styrofoam box filled with soil, and changes in mean daily relative humidity were the highest 98.2% in underground storage. As the storage period increased, the rhizome brix and the rate of rhizome loss and spoiled rhizome increased. The brix and loss rate of rhizome were higher in net sack filled with hull and styrofoam box filled with hull, but the rate of spoiled rhizome was the greatest in underground storage among storage methods. As the storage period increased, the hardness of rhizome epidermis increased, while that of rhizome endodermis decreased.
Keywords
Rehmannia glutinosa; rhizome quality; storage methods;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 지형준, 이상인 (1989) 대한약전외 한약(생약) 규격집주해서 ,한국인덱스사, p.341,563
2 윤인화 (1984) Polyethylene Film 밀봉저장중 사과, 밤, 감의 이화학적 변화에 관한 연구, 원광대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
3 남상영, 강한철, 김태수(2000) 포도품종에 따른 저장성 연구, 한국농산물저장유통학회지, 7, 29-32
4 농촌진흥청 (1999) 특용작물 생산실적, p.60-63
5 윤철구 (2002) 저장방법이 사과의 저장성 및 과실품질에 미치는 영향, 충북농업기술원시험연구보고서, p.211-216
6 농촌진흥청 (1995) 농사시험연구조사기준, p.73-75
7 황석중, 김현준, 함영일, 김성일, 신관용, 호교순 (1991) 농시논문집(원예편), 33, 98-107
8 이승택, 채영암 (1996) 약용작물재배, 향문사, p.181-186
9 이상인 (1975) 본초학, 의약사, p.105
10 안덕균, 김호철 (1997) 한약포제학, 일증사, p.168-175
11 남상영, 강한철, 김태수 (1999) 만생종 중립계 포도품종 Sheridan, Tano Red 및 Muscat Bailey A의 저장성 비교, 한국농산물저장유통학회지, 6, 376-379