Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.5.725

Comparison of Quality, Physiochemical and Functional Property between Organic and Conventional Rice  

Park, Jang-Hyun (Food Research Institute, Jeonnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services)
Nam, Seung-Hee (Food Research Institute, Jeonnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services)
Kim, Young-Ok (Food Research Institute, Jeonnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services)
Kwon, Oh-Do (Rice Research Institute, Jeonnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services)
An, Kyu-Nam (Rice Research Institute, Jeonnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition / v.39, no.5, 2010 , pp. 725-730 More about this Journal
Abstract
The differences between organic and conventional rice were studied from the point of view of quality, physiochemical property and functionality. It was concluded that organic rice showed a 6% lower complete rice ratio than conventional rice. However, organic rice exhibited more excellent physiochemical property on amylose or protein content, Toyo value, and acidity with 17.5%, 6.6%, 8.12%, and 8.7%, respectively. There was no difference between two kinds of rice on alkali digestion value and amino acids contents such as Asp, Ser, Glu, Ala, Leu, Arg. Among inorganic compounds of rice, four compounds including B, Mn, Fe, or Zn were slightly higher at organic rice with 1.1~2.7 mg/100 g, compared to conventional rice. Interestingly, total phenolic acid and phytic acid content were 89% or 23% higher at organic rice than conventional rice, respectively. MeOH extract from organic rice showed higher antioxidant activity with 26% than that of conventional rice with 22%. In contrast, conventional rice was favored than organic rice on stickness, taste, palatability fields at sensory evaluation.
Keywords
conventional or organic rice; physicochemical properties; functionality; sensory evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 2
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ha TY. 2002. Nutritional and functional properties of rice. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Postharvest Science and Technology of Agricultural Products Conference. p 64-71.
2 Grapo PA, Reaven G, Olefsky J. 1977. Postprandial plasmaglucose and plasma-insulin response to different complex carbohydrate. Diabetes 26: 1178-1183.   DOI
3 National Statistical office. 2004. Statistical annual report (Korea). p 22.
4 Levite D, Adrian M, Tamm L. 2000. Preliminary results of resveratrol in wine of organic and conventional vineyards. Proceeding 6th International Congress on Orgaic Horticulture. p 256-257.
5 Kim KJ, Kim KH. 1987. Study on the physico-chemical properties of rice grain harvested from different regions. Korean J Crop Sci 32: 234-242.
6 Kyoun OY, Oh SH, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Kim HC, Yoon WK, Kim HM, Kim MR. 2006 Analyses of nutrients and antinutrients of rice cultivars. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 22: 949-956.   과학기술학회마을
7 Wheeler BL, Ferrel RE. 1971. A method for phytic acid determination in wheat and wheat fractions. Cereal Chem 48: 312.
8 Choi Y, Kim MH, Shin JJ, Park JM, Lee J. 2003. The antioxidant activities of the some commercial teas. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 32: 723-727.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
9 Kim KH, Joo HK. 1990. Variation of grain quality of rice varieties grown at different location. Korean J Crop Sci 35: 137-145.
10 Kim YD, Ha KY, Lee JH, Shin HT, Cho SY. 1998. Relationship between palatability evaluation and its related to major characteristics of Korean developed Japonioca rice. Korean J Breeding 30: 62-63.
11 Song BH, Kim DY, Kim SK, Kim YD, Choi KS. 1988. Distribution of amino acids and fatty acids within the degermed brown rice kernel. J Korean Agric Chem 31: 7-21.   과학기술학회마을
12 Caris VC, Borel P. 2004. Influence of organic versus conventional agricultural practice on the antioxdant microconstituent content of tomato and derived purees. J Agric Food Chem 52: 21-26.   DOI
13 Lee YT, Kim JK, Ha SH, Cho HS, Suh SC. 2010. Analyses of nutrient composition in genetically modified ${\beta}$-carotene biofortified rice. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 39: 105-109.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
14 Lee SJ, Sohn SM. 2005. Review on nutritional value of organic plant products. Thends in Agric Life Sci 3: 35-42.
15 Rickar SE, Thompsin LU. 1997. Interaction and biological effects of phytic acid. Antinutrient and Phytochemicals in Food ACS Symposium Series 662. p 294-312.   DOI
16 남궁배, 황진봉. 2006. 친환경농산물의 성분함량 및 품질상의 차별성 연구. 한국식품연구원. p 81-82.
17 Choe JS, Ahn HH, Nam HJ. 2002. Comparison of nutritional composition in Korean rices. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 31: 885-892.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
18 Kim IH, Chun HS, Ha TY, Moon TH. 1995. Effect of processing on the antimutagenecity of rice. Korean J Food Sci Technol 27: 944-949.
19 Chun HS, Kim TH, Kim YJ, Kim KH. 1994. Inhibitory effect of rice extract on the chemically induced mutagenesis. Korean J Food Sci Technol 26: 188-194.   과학기술학회마을
20 Brandt K, Molgaard JP. 2001. Organic agriculture: Does it enhance or reduce the nutritional value of plant foods? J Sci Food Agric 81: 924-931.   DOI
21 Na GS, Lee SK, Kim SY. 2007. Antioxidative effects and quality characteristics of the rice cultivated by organic farming and ordinary farming. J Kor Soc Appl Biol Chem 50: 36-41.   과학기술학회마을
22 Park YH, Kang YS, Lee JH. 1995. Marketable value and quality of rice producted by rice-duck farming system. Korean J Intl Agric 10: 107-112.
23 Han LZ, Koh HJ, Won YJ, Choi HC, Nan ZH. 1999. Comparison of grain quality characteristics between japonica rices of Korea and Jilin province of China. Korean J Breeding 31: 48-56.
24 Kim KH, Joo HK. 1990. Variation of grain quality of rice varieties grown at different locations. I. Locational variation of quality-related characteristics of rice grain. Korean J Crop Sci 35: 137-145   과학기술학회마을
25 Juliano BO. 1971. A simplified assay for milled rice amylose. Cereal Sci Today 16: 334-340.