Browse > Article

A Study on the Development of Elementary Mathematics Textbooks as a Thematic Approach  

Park, Mangoo (Seoul National University of Education)
Chang, Hyewon (Seoul National University of Education)
Kim, Eun-Hye (Seoul Myongwon Elementary School)
Cho, Dookyoung (Seoul Shinsangdo Elementary School)
Kim, Yoonsun (Seoul Oksu Elementary School)
You, DaeHyun (Seoul Yuhyun Elementary School)
Nam, Misun (Seoul Galhyun Elementary School)
Kim, Joo-Sook (Seoul Banwon Elementary School)
Park, Wonkyu (Seoul Sumyoung Elementary School)
Tak, Byungjoo (Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
School Mathematics / v.17, no.1, 2015 , pp. 79-98 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop the elementary mathematics textbooks as a thematic approach, to suggest meaningful directions to future textbook development and curriculum development. For this study, we suggested mathematics textbooks of the three-themes, 'Healthy Life', 'Sustainable Life', 'Living-together Life', as multi-disciplinary, inter-disciplinary, and extra-disciplinary types. With the problems that employed thematic approaches, the post-achievement scores of experimental groups who used 'Healthy Life' and 'Sustainable Life' textbooks were meaningfully higher than those of control groups. However, the post-achievement scores of experimental groups who used 'Living-together Life' textbook were not meaningfully higher than those of control groups. The attitudes towards mathematics of all three experimental groups were meaningfully higher than those of control groups. After applications of elementary mathematics textbooks as a thematic approach, we need to develop related materials, to consider various grades, levels, regions for developing better mathematics textbooks.
Keywords
thematic approach; multi-disciplinary; inter-disciplinary; extra-disciplinary type; Mathematics textbooks;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강완(2013). 2009 개정 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 및 교과서 분석 : 개선을 위한 네가지 문제점. 학교수학, 15(3). 569-583
2 강충열(1998). 주제 중심교수모델 정립에 관한 연구. 초등교육연구, 12(1), 5-29.
3 강충열, 권동택, 정광순(2010). 주제 중심 학습프로그램(점프 리더)이 통합적 사고 성향 및 자기주도적 학습력에 미치는 효과. 학습자중심교과연구, 10(3), 1-19.
4 교육부(2013). ICT를 활용한 농산어촌 학생 학습 여건 개선 및 문예체험 확대 방안. 교육부.
5 권명광(1992). 교과서 그림에 대한 시각 디자인 측면의 연구. 교과서연구, 14, 52-64.
6 김경자, 조연순(1996). 주제 중심 통합교육과정 구성: 숙의과정. 교육학연구, 34(1), 251-272.
7 김영지(2003). 주제 중심 통합 단원의 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구. 인천교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.
8 박만구(2013). 초등수학교육에서 창의성 신장을 위한 융합적 접근의 탐색-한국 초등수학교과서와 미국 Investigations를 중심으로-. 수학교육, 52(2), 247-270.
9 박웅현(2011). 책은 도끼다. 서울: 북하우스.
10 박정희(2003). 주제 중심 통합교육과정 실행 및 다중지능발달 측면에서의 효과분석. 열린교육연구, 11(1), 101-129.
11 윤영칠(1999). 주제 중심 통합 학습이 초등학교 고학년 아동의 인지적, 정의적 영역의 성취에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교대학원 석사 학위논문.
12 이경민, 최일선(2010), 통합교육과정의 효과적 운영. 서울: 학지사.
13 이영준, 정귀남(2006). 통합교과 주제 중심 통합 학습이 아동의 자기 주도적학습 및 학업성취에 미치는 효과. 유아교육논문, 15(1), 143-159.
14 정원호(1995). 스스로 공부할수 있는 교과서. 교과서연구, 21, 37-40.
15 정태범(1989). 교과서 체재 개선에 관한 연구. 교과서연구, 2, 25-27.
16 한국교육과정평가원 (2005). PISA결과에 대한 해석. http://classroom.kice.re.kr/kice/content02/second03/data01/link.jsp에서 2013년 2월 10일에 발췌.
17 한학범(2010). 주제 중심 통합학습이 초등학교 고학년 아동의 학업성취 및 자기 주도적 학습력에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교대학원 석사학위논문.
18 현영호, 김용주, 조성준(2004). 교과서 게재 시각 자료의 미적 구성 방안 연구. 한국교과서연국재단: 연구보고서 04-4.
19 홍영기(2004). 주제 중심의 통합단원 설계모형의 근거이론적 접근. 교육인류학연구, 7(2), 111-137.
20 Anderson, C. W., & Roth, K. (1989). Teaching for meaningful and self-regulated learning of science. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 265-310). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21 Drake, S. M. (1993). Planning integrated curriculum. Alexandria, V. A.: ASCD.
22 Brodeur, D. R. (1998). Thematic teaching : Integrating cognitive and affective outcomes in elementary classrooms. Educational Technology, 38(6), 37-43
23 California State Board of Education. (1999). Standards for evaluating instructional materials for social content. Sacramento, CA: California State Board of Education. Retrieved December 13, 2014, at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/cf /documents/ socialcontent.pdf
24 Chronaki, A. (2000). Teaching maths through themebased resources: Pedagogic style, 'THEME' and 'MATHS' in lessons. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 141-163.   DOI
25 Eichinger, D., & Roth, K. (1991). Critical analysis of an elementary science curriculum: Bouncing around or connectedness?. East Lansing, MI: Center for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 340 611).
26 Holliday, W. G., Brunner, L. L., & Donais, E. L. (1977). Differential cognitive and affective response to flow diagrams in science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(1), 77-83.   DOI
27 Jones, R. (2000). Textbook troubles. American School Board Journal, December cover story. Retrieved December, 12, 2014, at http://www.asbj.com
28 Lonning, R. A., Thomas, C. D., & Thomas, P. W. (1998). Development of theme-based, Interdisciplinary, Intergrated curriculum: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 312-319.   DOI
29 MIT Media Lab (2014). Life long kindergarten. Chosun il bo, April 18, 2014.
30 Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education, Executive summary of the third International Mathematics and Science Study. East Lansing, MI: U.S. National Research Center for the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, Michigan State University.
31 The Center for Education Reform (2001). The textbook conundrum: What are the children learning and who decides?. Washington, D.C.: The Center for Education Reform.
32 Woodward, A., & Elliott, D. L. (1990). Textbooks: Consensus and controversy. In Textbooks and schooling in the United States: Eight-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.