1 |
강미정(2007). C. S. 퍼스의 기호학 연구 : 신미술사의 철학을 위하여. 미출판 박사학위논문, 서울대학교, 서울.
|
2 |
권용주, 정진수, 박윤복, 강민정(2003). 선언적 과학 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 과학철학적 연구: 귀납적, 귀추적, 연역적 과정을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(3), 215-228.
|
3 |
김성도(1997). 기호와 추론 : 퍼스의 가추법을 중심으로. 기호학연구, 3(1), 351-379.
|
4 |
김성도(1998). 가추법의 화용론적 함의. 담화와 인지, 5(2), 23-40.
|
5 |
김선희, 이종희(2002). 수학적 추론으로서의 가추법. 수학교육학연구, 12(2), 275-290.
|
6 |
김선희(2004). 수학적 지식 점유에 관한 기호학적 고찰. 미출판 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교, 서울.
|
7 |
김선희, 김기연(2004). 수학적 모델링 과정에 포함된 추론의 유형 및 역할 분석. 학교수학, 6(3), 283-299.
|
8 |
김원경, 문소영, 변지영(2006). 수학교사의 확률과 통계에 대한 지식과 신념. 수학교육, 45(4), 381-406.
|
9 |
김정섭, 박수홍(2002). 지식 창출을 위한 논리로서 가추법과 교수설계 적용을 위한 탐색. 교육공학연구, 18(4), 139-165.
|
10 |
남주현(2007). 초.중등 통계교육을 위한 통계적 방법론에 대한 연구. 미출판 박사학위논문, 이화여자대학교, 서울.
|
11 |
양은경, 신재홍(2014). 개방형 기하 문제에서 학생의 드래깅 활동을 통해 나타난 수학적 추론 분석. 수학교육학연구, 24(1), 1-27.
|
12 |
신보미, 이경화(2006). 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션을 통한 통계적 확률 지도에 대한 연구. 수학교육학연구, 16(2), 139-156.
|
13 |
이병덕(2008). 논리적 추론과 증명. 서울: 이제이북스.
|
14 |
이영하, 이은호(2010). 통계적 추론에서의 표집분포 개념 지도를 위한 시뮬레이션 소프트웨어 설계 및 구현. 학교수학, 12(3), 273-299.
|
15 |
이영하, 강민정(2013). 교과서 문제해결에 포함된 가추의 유형: 중학교 2학년과 3학년 수학 교과서를 중심으로. 수학교육학연구, 23(3), 335-351.
|
16 |
이정연, 우정호(2009). 조건부확률 개념의 교수학적 분석과 이해 분석. 수학교육학연구, 19(2), 233-256.
|
17 |
전영삼(1990). 피셔의 우도와 카르납의 확증도. 철학연구, 14(1), 87-119.
|
18 |
정용재, 송진웅(2006). Peirce의 귀추법에 관한 이론적 고찰을 통한 과학교육적 함의 탐색. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(6), 703-722.
|
19 |
Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education on symbolizing and computer tools. Freudenthal Institute.
|
20 |
Ben-Zvi, D., & Arcavi, A. (2001). Junior high school students' construction of global views of data and data representations. Educational studies in mathematics, 45, 35-65.
DOI
|
21 |
Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Goals, definitions, and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 3-16). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
22 |
Chinn, C., & Anderson, R. (1998). The Structure of Discussions inteded to Promote Reasoning. The Teachers College Record, 100(2), 315-368.
|
23 |
Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Principles of instructional design for supporting the development of students' statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 375-395). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
24 |
delMas, R. C. (2004). A comparison of mathematical and statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 79-95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
25 |
Dinov, I. D., Christou, N., & Gould, R. (2009). Law of large numbers: The theory, applications and technology-based education. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1), n1. www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v17n1/dinov.html
|
26 |
Eco, U. (1983). Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In U. Eco & T. Sebeok (Eds.), The Sign of Three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (pp. 198-220). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
|
27 |
Eco, U. (2009). 기호학과 언어 철학. (김성도 번역.). 파주: 열린책들. (원본출판 1984)
|
28 |
Ernest, P. (2005). Agency and creativity in the semiotics of learning mathematics. In M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign - Grounding mathematics education (pp. 23-34). New York: Springer.
|
29 |
Furtak, E. M., Hardy, I., Beinbrech, C., Shavelson, R. J., & Shemwell, J. T. (2010). A framework for analyzing evidence-based reasoning in science classroom discourse. Educational Assessment, 15(3-4), 175-196.
DOI
|
30 |
GAISE (2005a). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A curriculum framework for PreK-12 statistics education. The American Statistical Association (ASA). Retrieved December 4, 2006, from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GAISEPreK-12.htm
|
31 |
Groth, R. E., & Bergner, J. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptual and procedural knowledge of mean, median, and mode. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 37-63.
DOI
|
32 |
GAISE (2005b). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) college report. The American Statistical Association (ASA). Retrieved December 4, 2006, from http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise/GAISECollege.htm
|
33 |
Garfield, J. (2002). The Challenge of Developing Statistical Reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/garfield.html
|
34 |
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Creating statistical reasoning environments. J. Garfield & D. Ben-Zvi. (Eds.), Developing Students Statistical Reasoning: Connecting Research and Teaching Practice (pp. 45-63). New York: Springer.
|
35 |
Harradine, A., Batanero, C., & Rossman, A. (2011). Students and teachers' knowledge of sampling and inference. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics-challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 235-246). New York: Springer.
|
36 |
Hoffmann, M, H. G. (2005). Signs as means of discovery. In M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign: Grounding mathematics education (pp. 45-56). New York: Springer.
|
37 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). " Doing the lesson" or" doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
DOI
|
38 |
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
39 |
Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1817-1841.
DOI
|
40 |
Leavy, A. M. (2006). Using data comparison to support a focus on distribution: Examining preservice teacher's understandings of distribution when engaged in statistical inquiry. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 89-114.
|
41 |
Mason, J. (1996). Abduction at the heart of mathematical being. In E. Gray (Ed.), Thinking about mathematics & Music of the spheres: Papers presented for the inaugural lecture of Professor David Tall (pp. 34-40). Coventry: Mathematics Education Research Centre.
|
42 |
Meyer, M. (2010). Abduction-A logical view for investigating and initiating processes of discovering mathematical coherences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 185-205.
DOI
|
43 |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for schools mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
|
44 |
Nguyen-Danh (2011). The role of abduction in realizing geometric invariants. In A. Mendez-Vilas (Ed.), Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts (pp. 539-547). Badajoz, Spain: FORMATEX.
|
45 |
Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23-41.
DOI
|
46 |
Pedemonte, B., & Reid, D. (2011). The role of abduction in proving processes. Educational studies in mathematics, 76(3), 281-303.
DOI
|
47 |
Peirce, C. S. (1931-1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols VII-VIII. B. Arthur (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
48 |
Pratt, D. (2005). How do teachers foster students' understanding of probability? In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 171-189). NY: Springer.
|
49 |
Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vols I-VI. C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
50 |
Petty, M. E. (2001). A case study of the abductive reasoning processes of pre-service elementary education students in a role playing setting concerning a mock senate hearing on global climate change. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
|
51 |
Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2006). An emerging hierarchy of reasoning about distribution: From a variation perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 46-68.
|
52 |
Rymes, B. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
|
53 |
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|
54 |
Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 345-366). NY: Springer.
|
55 |
Stohl. H., & Tarr. J. E. (2002). Developing notions of inference using probability simulation tools. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 319-337.
DOI
|
56 |
Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
57 |
Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher's role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516-551.
DOI
|
58 |
Yackel, E. (2001). Explanation, justification and argumentation in mathematics classrooms. In: M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 1 (pp. 9-24). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
|
59 |
Weber, K., Maher, C., Powell, A., & Lee, H. S. (2008). Learning opportunities from group discussions: Warrants become the objects of debate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 247-261.
DOI
|
60 |
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
|
61 |
Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher's role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440.
DOI
|