Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.3.435

The Characteristic Analysis of Content Areas and Behavioral Areas Based on the Deviation of NAEA Achievement Level-Based Correct-Answer Rate  

Huh, Nan (Kyonggi University)
Yang, Seong Hyun (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.32, no.3, 2018 , pp. 435-453 More about this Journal
Abstract
The results analysis of National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA) can provide various implications for teaching and learning in the school field. In this study we analyzed the deviation of NAEA achievement level-based correct-answer rate and the distribution of the responses percentages for three years from 2015 to 2017 focused on multiple-choice items. First we calculated the deviation of correct-answer rate between advanced level and proficient level and between proficient level and basic level, and then we selected the items whose deviation of correct-answer rate is more than the third quartile. We explored what the content areas, behavior areas and achievement standards of each item are and what the achievement standards and characteristics of these questions are. Based on the results of the analysis, we intended to derive implications for appropriate teaching-learning methods at each achievement-level.
Keywords
National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA); Achievement Level; deviation of correct-answer rate; 2009 Revised Mathematics Curriculum;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dong, H. K., Rim, H. M., Kim, S. K. & Park, S. M. (2017b). The Result of Analysis for 2016 National Assessment of Educational Achievement-Mathematics-. KICE, ORM 2017-95-3.
2 Park, D. S. (2003). Education Research Methodology. Seoul: Mooneumsa.
3 Park, S. I., Hyun, J., Im, Y. K., Seo, H. K., Kim, Y. M., Shin, S. K., Lee, B. H. & Cheong, G. H. (1984). A Study on Program Development for Underachievers in the Middle School. KEDI, RR 84-12.
4 Park, H. S., Park, K. Y., Kim, Y. K., Park, K. H., Park, Y. B., Kwon, H. C., Park, N. K., Back, Y. J. & Hwang, J. Y. (2004). On the Scheme to Cure the Mathematics Disliking Disposition of Underachievers in the Middle School. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E, 43(2), 115-137.
5 Bae, B. R. (2009). Modeling of Structural Equation Model: Principles and Practices. Seoul: Cheongram Publisher.
6 Bae, J. D. and Cho, J. S. (2003). A Study on the Factors of Mathematics Underachievers in the Middle School. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E, 15, 167-173.
7 Seong, T, J. (2010). Understanding and Application of Modern Basic Statistics. Gyeonggi: Education-Science Publisher
8 Shin, S. K., Kim, Y. M., Park, S. I., Seo, H. K. & Im, Y. K. (1984). A Study on Development of supplementary learning program for Underachievers in the Middle School. KEDI, TR 84-2.
9 Shin, J. K., Yun, S. I. and Kim, Y. H. (2014). Efficient Teaching Method for the Underachieving Students through Level Differentiated Classes. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E, 28(1), 81-96.
10 Yang, S. H., Kim, S. K., Dong, H. K. & Park, S. M. (2018). The Primary Result of 2017 National Assessment of Educational Achievement-Middle School Mathematics-. KICE, PIM 2018-7-3.
11 Cho, Y. M. (2006). How to Make National Assessment of Educational Achievement Better for Managing National Mathematical Curriculum. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 16(3), 199-220.
12 Woo, J., Kim, Y. and Shin, J. (2007). The Study on Characteristics of Operation Errors in Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities of Elementary School. The journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 575-596.
13 Yu, J. P. (2014). Concept and Understanding of Structural Equation Model. Seoul: Hanarae Publisher.
14 Lee, K. S. & Park, S. M. (2018). Analysis of Constructed Response Items of High School Mathematics in the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(2), 159-179.   DOI
15 Jo, Y. D. & Lee, K. S. (2014). Elementary school learning characteristic of each proficiency level that appears in 2010-2012 Nation Assessment of Educational Achievement. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A, 53(2), 219-237.
16 Jin, S. M. & Song, Y. M. (2007). A Case Study on the Difficulties in the Area of Function Suffered by the 3rd Grade Middle School Mathematics Underachievers. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 10(2), 187-206.
17 Lee, C. H., Nam, M. W., Nam, G. Y., Park, E. A., Kim, H. S., Kwon, J. R., Choi, W. H., Lee. I. H., Kim, M. K. & Song, M. Y. (2010). A Study on Developing Items for 2010 National Assessment of Educational Achievement. KICE, RRE 2010-6-1.
18 Cheong, G. H., Chae, S. H., Kim, J. C., Lee. J. G., Kim, J. H., Lee, B. J., Lee, M. K., Imm, C. B., Lee, K. H., Kim, K. H., Son, W. S., Min, B. G., Park, S. M. Cho, Y. M., Jeong, E. Y. & Kim, J. S. (2003). A Study on 2002 National Assessment of Educational Achievement(II). KICE, RRE 2003-1-1.
19 Cho, Y. M., Lee, D. H. & Lee, B. J. (2004). A Study on 2013 National Assessment of Educational Achievement-Mathematics-. KICE, RRE 2004-1-4.
20 Lee, K. S. & Jo, Y. D. (2014). The Characteristics of Middle School Mathematics Achievement Levels Based on the Results of the National Assessment of Educational Achievement from 2010 to 2012. School Mathematics, 16(2), 237-257.
21 Ko, S. G., Yang, W. Y. and Oh, H, S. (2008). New General Statistics. Seoul: Kyowoosa.
22 Ko, J. H. (2008). An Analysis of the Characteristics of the Below-Basic Students in the Grade 3 National Diagnostic Assessment of Basic Competency. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 18(3), 283-308.
23 Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2011). Mathematics Curriculum. Bulletin of MEST No.2011-361 [Seperate Volume #8].
24 Ministry of Education (2013). The Basic Plan Announcement for 2017 National Assessment of Educational Achievement. Press release of MOE(2013.04.24.).
25 Lee, S. H., Lee, B. J. & Son, H. C. (2007). Estimating the regression equations for predicting item difficulty of mathematics in the College Scholastic Ability Test. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A, 46(4), 407-421.
26 Hong, E. J. and Seong, T. J. (2015). The Effect of the Order and Gender on the Accuracy of Estimation for Ability Parameters and Test Anxiety. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 28(2), 361-379.
27 Lee, K. H. & Ko, H. K. (2005). A study on Cases of Difficulty Variables in High School Mathematics Items. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 13(2), 323-343.
28 Lee, B. J. (2013). A Comparative Analysis on Educational Achievement in Mathematics Classifying by Content Areas of th Primary and Secondary School Students. The Korean Journal for History of Mathematics, 23(4), 59-82.
29 Lee, I. H., Lee, K. S., Rim, H. M. & Park, S. M. (2016). The Result of Analysis for 2015 National Assessment of Educational Achievement-Mathematics-. KICE, ORM 2016-31-3.
30 Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum. Bulletin of MOE No.2015-84 [Seperate Volume #8].
31 Kim, M. S., No, K. H., Park, J., Boo, J. Y., Yang, G. S. & Lee, H. Y. (1998). A Study on National Assessment of Educational Achievement. KICE, RRE 1998-8.
32 Ministry of Education (2017). The Result Announcement for 2017 National Assessment of Educational Achievement. Press release of MOE(2017.11.20.).
33 Kwon, J. R. (2012). Comparison on proficient level and below basic level students' mathematical achievement in the National Achievement Evaluation and Assessment. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E, 26(1), 29-50.
34 Kim, K. H., Kim, W. S., Kim, J. H., Choi, I. B., Park, I. Y., Sin, J. A., Song, M. Y., Kim, H. K., Kim, D. Y., Kim, M. K., Sin, D. K., Lee, I. H., Choi, I. S., Han, K. T. & Han, J. A. (2013). The Introduction Method for Computer-Based National Assessment of Educational Achievement. KICE, DRE 2013-5.
35 Kim, S, J., Kim, W. S., Park, I. Y., Seo, M. H., Han, J. A., Kim, M. H., Min, S. H., Lee, B. R. & Son, J. Y. (2016). The Middle School Result of 2015 National Assessment of Educational Achievement. KICE, ORM 2016-32-1.
36 Kim, J. C., Kim, S. H. & Kim, S. H. (2009). The Effect of the Order of Item Arrangement on Item Difficulty and Item Discrimination. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 22(2), 409-427.
37 Dong, H. K., Kim, K. J., Kang, M. K., Jang, E. S., Sung, K. H., Rim, H. M., Kim, S. K., Lee, J. B., Bae, J. K., Kim, S. Y., Choi, B. T., Choi, W. H., Kim, Y. J. & Lee, G. Y. (2017a). A Study on Developing Items for 2017 National Assessment of Educational Achievement. KICE, RRE 2017-1.
38 Do, J. H. & Ko, J. H. (2008). Representative items for each achievement level in the National Assessment of Educational Achievement of Mathematics: the concept and Use for Individualized Education. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E, 22(2), 109-124.