1 |
An, K. Y. & Kwon, O. N. (2002). Error analysis and treatment in function graph task, J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 13(1). 337-360.
|
2 |
Yang, S. H. (2017). A View on the Diversity of the Word and Mathematical Notation Expression Used in High School Mathematics Textbooks, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 20(3), 211-237.
|
3 |
Lee, J. A., Maeng, S. H., & Kim, C. J. (2007). The Socio-semiotic Analysis of Visual Images in Elementary Science Textbooks: Focused on Weather and Forecast, The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 28(3), 277-847.
DOI
|
4 |
Lee, C. H. & Kim, B. M. (2003). Analysis of the Error-Remedial Effect and Change of the Students' Misconception on the Learning of Linear Function, School Mathematics, 5(1), 115-133.
|
5 |
Lee, J. Y. et al. (2018). Middle School Mathematics 1, Seoul: Chun Jae Textbook Publishers.
|
6 |
Chang, H. et al. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of Ratio and Rate in Elementary Mathematics Textbooks, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 21(1), 135-160.
|
7 |
Kim, S. H. & Paik, H. S. (2016). An exploration of the direction of a graph in middle school mathematics education, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(6), 445-468.
|
8 |
Kim, S. H. et al. (2015). A study to reform the mathematics textbooks that enhance the understanding of terms and symbols, KOFAC BD16010002.
|
9 |
Kim, W. K. et. al. (2018). Middle School Mathematics 1, Seoul: Vi sang Textbook Publishers.
|
10 |
Kim, C. & Shin, J. (2018). A Case Study of Students' Constructions and Interpretations of Informal Graphs, School Mathematics, 20(1), 107-130.
DOI
|
11 |
Lew, H. C. et. al. (2018). Middle School Mathematics 1, Seoul: Chun Jae Textbook Publishers.
|
12 |
Park, S., Byun, H., & Ju, M. (2011). Study on the Mathematics and Learning Characteristics of Middle School Students, KOFAC RRI 2011-5.
|
13 |
Ma, M. & Shin, J. (2016). Gifted Middle School Students' Covariational Reasoning Emerging through the Process of Algebra Word Problem Solving, School Mathematics, 18(1), 43-59.
|
14 |
Park, K. S. (2013). An Analysis on Real State of Using Terms in Grade 1-2 Math Textbook/Workbook in Korea: Centered on 'Product', 'Place Value', 'Multiplication Stairs', 'Numeral', School Mathematics, 15(4), 833-846.
|
15 |
Park, K. S. & Yim, J. H. (2005). A Critical Examination of Undefined Mathematical Terms Used in Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks of Korea, The journal of educational research in mathematics, 15(2), 197-213.
|
16 |
Park, J. H. (2007). A Study on Teaching-Learning for Linguistic Realization in Informative Speech, Journal of Speech Communication, 10, 143-166.
|
17 |
Pang, J. S., Kwon, M., & Kim, J. W. (2017). Analysis of the Adequacy of Vocabulary in Elementary Mathematics Textbooks and Workbooks for Grades 5 and 6, The journal of educational research in mathematics, 27(3), 329-350.
|
18 |
Jeon, Y. O. (2006). A Study on Unit of Spoken Language, Korean Language Research, 19, 271-299.
|
19 |
Jeon, S. K. (2017). A Systemic Functional Linguistic Study on Analyzing the Structure of Teaching Practice of High School Mathematics Lessons from the Perspective of Mathematical Objects(PhD Thesis), Department of Mathematics Education, Graduate School Yeungnam University.
|
20 |
Jeon, S. K. & Cho, C. S. (2015). A Study on the Written Texts of a High School Mathematics Textbook and Teacher's Classroom Discourse, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(4), 525-547.
|
21 |
Choi, Y. S. (2014). Critical discourse analysis, Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.
|
22 |
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O., & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing : tasks, learning, and teaching, Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 1-64.
DOI
|
23 |
Alshwaikh, J. (2011). Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication: A functional analytic framework (PhD Thesis). Institute of Education, University of London, London.
|
24 |
Alshwaikh, J. (2016). Investigating the geometry curriculum in Palestinian textbooks: towards multimodal analysis of Arabic mathematics discourse. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 165-181.
DOI
|
25 |
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government. (2015). Mathematics curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4-6). Hong Kong: HKSARG. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/ attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/ma/curr/Math_CAGuide_e_2015.pdf
|
26 |
Hersh, R. (1997). What is mathematics, really? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
|
27 |
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual images. London: Routledge.
|
28 |
Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an Analysis of Visual Images in School Science Textbooks and Press Articles about Science and Technology. Research in Science Education, 33, 189-216.
DOI
|
29 |
Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166-195.
DOI
|
30 |
Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study - key stage 3. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239058/SECONDARY_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics.pdf
|
31 |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 17(3), 242-292.
|
32 |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Language as social semiotic: towards a general sociolinguistic theory. Columbia: Hornbeam Press.
|
33 |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arn.
|
34 |
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985/2004). An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edition. Revised by Matthiessen, M. I. M., London : Hodder Education.
|
35 |
Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J. R.(1993). Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: the Falmer Press.
|
36 |
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. (1999) Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
|
37 |
Morgan, C. (2016). Studying the role of human agency in school mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 120-141.
DOI
|
38 |
Lemke, J. L. (2003). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In A. Saenz-Ludlow, S. Sellweher, & V. Scifarelli(Eds.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 215-234). Ottowa: Legas Publishing.
|
39 |
McKenzie, D. L. & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the test of graphing in science(TOGS). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(17), 571-579.
DOI
|
40 |
Morgan, C. (1996). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. London: Falmer Press.
|
41 |
Morgan, C. & Sfard, A. (2016). Investigating changes in high-stakes mathematics examinations: a discursive approach. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 92-119.
DOI
|
42 |
Morgan, C. & Tang, S. (2016). To what extent are students expected to participate in specialised mathematical discourse? Change over time in school mathematics in England. Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 142-164.
DOI
|
43 |
O'Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.
|
44 |
O'Halloran, K. L. (2015). The language of learning mathematics: A multimodal perspective. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 63-74.
DOI
|
45 |
Park, J. (2016). Communicational approach to study textbook discourse on the derivative. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 395-421.
DOI
|
46 |
Queensland Studies Authority. (2013). Year 7 mathematics - Australian curriculum in Queensland. Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority.
|
47 |
Solomon, Y. & O'Neill, J. (1998). Mathematics and narrative. Language and Education, 12(3), 210-221.
DOI
|
48 |
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139-159.
DOI
|
49 |
Sfard, A. (2000). On reform movement and the limits of mathematical discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 157-189.
DOI
|
50 |
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
51 |
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
|
52 |
Vygotsky, L. S. (2011). 생각과 말, (배희철, 김용호 역). 서울: 살림터. (러시아어초판은 1934년, 영어초판은 1986년 출판).
|
53 |
Wagner, D. (2004). Silence and Voice in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom. unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
|
54 |
Wagner, D. (2007). Students' critical awareness of voice and agency in mathematics classroom discourse. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(1), 31-50.
DOI
|
55 |
Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2003). Philosophical investigations: The German text, with a revised English translation(3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
|
56 |
Kim, N. H. et al. (2016). Study of mathematics curriculum and teaching materials for pre-service teachers and in-service teachers, Seoul: Kyungmoonsa.
|
57 |
The Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum, Se Jong: The Ministry of Education.
|
58 |
National Institute of Korean Language (2018). Standard Korean Language Dictionary(web version), National Institute of Korean Language. Retrieved from http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/main.jsp#
|
59 |
Kwon, S. & Park, K. S. (2011). A Critical Analysis on Usage and Defining Methods of Terms in Elememtary Mathematics Textbooks in Korea Centered on Some Examples, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 15(2), 301-316.
|
60 |
Kwon, Y. M. & An, B. G. (2005). The Analysis on Students' Understanding of Mathematics Terms Being Used in Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks, Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 9(2), 137-159.
|