| 1 |
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245-274.
DOI
|
| 2 |
Arzarello, F., & Robutti, O. (2008). Framing the embodied mind approach within a multimodal paradigm. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 720-749, 2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
|
| 3 |
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 746-783, 2nd ed.). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
|
| 4 |
Battista, M. T. (2008). Development of the shape makers geometry microworld: design principles and research. In G. Blume & M. K. Heid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Cases and perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 131-156). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
|
| 5 |
Bussi, M. G. B., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2015). Geometry in early years: sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(3), 391-405.
DOI
|
| 6 |
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1990). The effects of Logo on children's conceptualizations of angle and polygons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(5), 356-371.
DOI
|
| 7 |
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School officers.
|
| 8 |
Dick, T. P., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2011). Focus in high school mathematics: Technology to support reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
|
| 9 |
Dodge, T., Barab, S., Stuckey, B., Warren, S., Heiselt, C., & Stein, R. (2008). Children's sense of self: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 225-249.
|
| 10 |
Drijvers, P., Kieran, C., & Mariotti, M. A. (2010). Integrating technology into mathematics education: Theoretical perspectives. In C. Hoyles & J.-B. Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics education and technology-rethinking the terrain (pp. 89-132). New York: Springer.
|
| 11 |
Freiman, V., Polotskaia, E., & Savard, A. (2017). Using a computer-based learning task to promote work on mathematical relationships in the context of word problems in early grades. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49(6), 835-849.
DOI
|
| 12 |
Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2011). Meaningful learning with technology. Boston, MA: Pearson.
|
| 13 |
Hoyles, C. (1993). Microworlds/Schoolworlds: The transformation of an innovation. In C. Keitel and K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning through computers: Mathematics and educational technology (pp. 1-17). Verlag, Berlin: Springer.
|
| 14 |
Hoyles, C., & Healy, L. (1997). Unfolding meanings for reflective symmetry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2(1), 27-59.
DOI
|
| 15 |
Jones, K. (1998). Theoretical frameworks for the learning of geometrical reasoning. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. Geometry Working Group, 18(1 & 2), 29-34.
|
| 16 |
Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), A handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-556). New York, NY: Macmillan.
|
| 17 |
Kaur, H. (2015). Two aspects of young children’s thinking about different types of dynamic triangles: prototypicality and inclusion. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(3), 407-420.
DOI
|
| 18 |
Konold, C., Harradine, A., & Kazak, S. (2007). Understanding distributions by modeling them. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(3), 217-230.
DOI
|
| 19 |
Kynigos, C., Koutlis, S., & Hadzilacos, T. (1997). Mathematics with component oriented exploratory software. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2(3), 229-250.
DOI
|
| 20 |
Mariotti, M. A. (2009). Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective: The role of the teacher. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 427-440.
DOI
|
| 21 |
Maschietto, M., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2013). Designing a duo of material and digital artifacts: the pascaline and Cabri Elem e-books in primary school mathematics. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(7), 959-971.
DOI
|
| 22 |
Moreno-Armella, L., Hegedus, S. J., & Kaput, J. J. (2008). From static to dynamic mathematics: Historical and representational perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(2), 99-111.
DOI
|
| 23 |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Ed.). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
|
| 24 |
Ng, O. L., & Sinclair, N. (2015). Young children reasoning about symmetry in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(3), 421-434.
DOI
|
| 25 |
Nivens, R. A., & Otten, S. (2017). Assessing journal quality in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(4), 348-368.
DOI
|
| 26 |
Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers (Vol. 17). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
|
| 27 |
Noss, R., Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1997). The construction of mathematical meanings: Connecting the visual with the symbolic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 203-233.
DOI
|
| 28 |
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Cambridge: Perseus Books.
|
| 29 |
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36(2), 1-11.
|
| 30 |
Pea, R. (1987). Cognitive technologies for mathematics education. In A.H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 89-122). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
| 31 |
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
|
| 32 |
Roschelle, J., Noss, R., Blikstein, P., & Jackiw, N. (2017). Technology for learning mathematics. In J. Cai (Ed.) The compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 273-296). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
|
| 33 |
Soury-Lavergne, S., & Maschietto, M. (2015). Articulation of spatial and geometrical knowledge in problem solving with technology at primary school. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(3), 435-449.
DOI
|
| 34 |
Taylor, R. (Ed.). (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 1-10). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
|
| 35 |
Thompson, P. W. (1992). Notations, conventions, and constraints: Contributions to effective uses of concrete materials in elementary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 123-147.
DOI
|
| 36 |
Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281-307.
DOI
|
| 37 |
Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101.
DOI
|
| 38 |
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
| 39 |
Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: The perspective of constructs. In F. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 1169-1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
|
webmaster
