1 |
Anwar, A., Yuwono, I., Irawan, E. B., & As’ari, A. R. (2017). Investigation of contingency patterns of teachers' scaffolding in teaching and learning mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 65-76.
|
2 |
Buchbinder, O., & Cook, A. (2018). Examining the mathematical knowledge for teaching of proving in scenarios written by pre-service teaches. In O. Buchbinder & S. Kuntze (Eds.), Mathematics teachers engaging with representations of practice. (pp. 131-154). New York: Springer.
|
3 |
Chapin, S., O'Connor, C., & Anderson, N. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades K-6 (2nd ed.). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
|
4 |
Chiu, M. M. (2004). Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on-task. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 365-399.
DOI
|
5 |
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
|
6 |
Davidson, N. (1990). Cooperative learning in mathematics: A handbook for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
|
7 |
Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39-65.
DOI
|
8 |
Ding, M., Li, X., Piccolo, D., & Kulm, G. (2007). Teacher interventions in cooperative-learning mathematics classes. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 162-175.
DOI
|
9 |
Elbers, E., Hajer, M., Jonkers, M., Koole, T., & Prenger, J. (2008). Instructional dialogues: participation in dyadic interactions in multicultural classrooms. In J. Deen, M. Hajer, & T. Koole (Eds.), Interaction in two multicultural mathematics classrooms: Mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 141-172). Amsterdam: Aksant.
|
10 |
Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288-315.
DOI
|
11 |
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
|
12 |
Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., et al. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. (pp. 358-389). San Francisco: John Wiley.
|
13 |
Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers' ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 12-30). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.
|
14 |
Lindquist, M. M. (1989). Mathematics content and small-group instruction in grades four through six. The Elementary School Journal, 89(5), 625-632.
DOI
|
15 |
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking. London: Routledge.
|
16 |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
|
17 |
Smith, M., & Stein, M. K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
|
18 |
TeachingWorks (n.d.). High-leverage practices. Retrieved from http://www.teachingworks.org/workof-teaching/high-leverage-practices.
|
19 |
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: a decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271-296.
DOI
|
20 |
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 46-57.
DOI
|
21 |
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2014). Teacher scaffolding in small-group work: An intervention study. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 600-650.
DOI
|
22 |
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: Support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43(5), 615-641.
DOI
|
23 |
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
24 |
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.
DOI
|
25 |
Wood, M. B., & Kalinec, C. A. (2012). Student talk and opportunities for mathematical learning in small group interactions. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52, 109-127.
DOI
|
26 |
Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408.
DOI
|