1 |
Alexander, J. M., & Schnick, A. K. (2008). Motivation. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 423-448). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
|
2 |
Allenbaugh, E. (2002). Deliberate success. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Career Press.
|
3 |
Bell, J. (2010). Educational resilience in primary school children in South Australia: An investigation. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2440/65629
|
4 |
Benson, A. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2002). The case of Blake: Number word and number development. Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
|
5 |
Bhanot, R., & Jovanovic, J. (2005). Do parents' academic gender stereotypes influence whether they intrude on their children's homework? Sex Roles, 52(9-10), 597-607. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-3728-4
DOI
|
6 |
Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
|
7 |
Campbell, J. R., & Verna, M. A. (2007). Effective parental influence: Academic home climate linked to children's achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 501-519.
DOI
|
8 |
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2010). The mathematics of sex: How biology and society conspire to limit talented women and girls. Oxford, Enland: Oxford University Press.
|
9 |
Cho, S. (2000). Current states and future directions of education for the mathematically gifted.
|
10 |
Cho, S. H., & Lee, H. (2002). Korean gifted girls and boys: What influenced them to be Olympians and non-Olympians. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 106-111.
|
11 |
Choi, K. (2010). Characteristics of Korean International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) winners and various developmental influences. (PhD), Teachers College, Columbia University.
|
12 |
Choi, K. (2013). Influence of formal schooling on International Mathematical Olympiad winners from Korea. Roeper Review, 35(3), 187-196. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2013.794890
DOI
|
13 |
Choi, K., & Hong, D. S. (2009). Gifted education in Korea: Three Korean high schools for the mathematically gifted. Gifted Child Today, 32(2), 42-49.
DOI
|
14 |
Clasen, D. R., & Clasen, R. E. (1997). Mentoring: A time-honored option for education of the gifted and talented. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 218-229). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
|
15 |
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
DOI
|
16 |
Covington, M. V. (2002). The developmental course of achievement motivation: A need-based approach. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 33-56). San Francisco, CA: Elsevier Science.
|
17 |
Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B. O. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
|
18 |
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157-197. doi: 10.1023/a:1014628810714
DOI
|
19 |
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Exper performance: Its sturcture and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
DOI
|
20 |
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.
DOI
|
21 |
Gagne, F. (2005a). From gifts to talents: The DMGT as a developmental model. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davison (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 98-119). New York, NY: Canbridge University Press.
|
22 |
Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Talent identification and development in education (TIDE). Gifted Education International, 10, 10-15. doi: 10.1177/026142949401000103
DOI
|
23 |
Gagne, F. (2000). Understanding the complex chorography of talent development through DMGTbased analysis. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 67-79). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
|
24 |
Gagne, F. (2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119-147.
DOI
|
25 |
Gagne, F. (2005b). From noncompetence to exceptional talent: Exploring the range of academic achievement with and between grade levels. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 139-153. doi:10.1177/001698620504900204
DOI
|
26 |
Gagne, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21, 81-99. doi: 10.1080/13598139.2010.525341
DOI
|
27 |
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
|
28 |
Geist, E. A., & King, M. (2008). Different, not better: Gender differences in mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(1), 43-52.
|
29 |
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY.
|
30 |
Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York, NY: Macmillan.
|
31 |
Hamilton, S. F., & Hamilton, M. A. (1992). Mentoring programs: Promise and paradox. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(7), 546-550.
|
32 |
Guimond, S. (1999). Attitude change during college: Normative or informational social influences? Social Psychology of Education, 2, 237-261.
DOI
|
33 |
Gumbiner, J. (2003). Adolescent assessment. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
|
34 |
Haile, G. A., & Nguyen, A. N. (2008). Determinants of academic attainment in the United States: A quantile regression analysis of test scores. Education Economics, 16(1), 29-57.
DOI
|
35 |
Jacobs, J. E., & Bleeker, M. M. (2004). Girls' and boys' developing interests in math and science: Do parents matter? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2004(106), 5-21.
DOI
|
36 |
Kao, C.-Y. (2011). The dilemmas of peer relationships confronting mathematically gifted female adolescents: Nine cases in Taiwan. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 83-94.
DOI
|
37 |
Karp, A. (2003). Thirty years after: The lives of former winners of Mathematical Olympiads. Roeper Review, 25(2), 83-87.
DOI
|
38 |
Kim, Y. (2008). The educational role of mathematics Ha-Gwon in the Korean American community. (Ed.D. dissertation), Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
|
39 |
Kover, D. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2010). The influence of instrumentality beliefs on achievement motivation: A study of high achieving adolescents. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 470-498.
DOI
|
40 |
Krutetskii, V. A. (Ed.). (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
|
41 |
Kwok, P. (2004). Examination-Oriented knowledge and value transformation in East Asian Cram Schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(1), 64-75.
DOI
|
42 |
McKenna, M., Hollingworth, P., & Barnes, L. (2005). Developing latent mathematics abilities in economically disadvantaged students. Roeper Review, 27(4), 222-227.
DOI
|
43 |
Lee, K. H., & Sriraman, B. (2012). Gifted girls and nonmathematical aspirations: A longitudinal case study of two gifted Korean girls. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(1), 3-14.
DOI
|
44 |
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
|
45 |
Marsh, P., Allen, J. P., Ho, M., Porter, M., & McFarland, F. C. (2006). The changing nature of adolescent friendships: Longitudinal links with early adolescent ego development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 26(4), 414-431. doi: 10.1177/0272431606291942
DOI
|
46 |
Muratori, M. C., Stanley, J. C., Ng, L., Ng, J., Gross, M. U. M., Tao, T., & Tao, B. (2006). Insights from SMPY's greatest former child prodigies: Drs. Terence ("Terry") Tao and Lengard ("Lenny") Ng reflect on their talent development. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(4), 307-324.
DOI
|
47 |
Nokelainen, P., Tirri, K., Campbell, J. R., & Walberg, H. (2007). Factors that contribute to or hinder academic productivity: Compare two groups of most and least successful Olympians. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(6), 483-500.
DOI
|
48 |
Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2010). Special schools and other options for gifted STEM students. Roeper Review, 32, 61-70.
DOI
|
49 |
Pata, K., Lehtinen, E., & Sarapuu, T. (2006). Inter-relations of tutor's and peers' scaffolding and decision-making discourse acts. Instructional Science: An International Journal of Learning and Cognition, 34(4), 313-341.
DOI
|
50 |
Peat, M., Daziel, J., & Grant, A. M. (2000). Enhancing the transition to university by facilitating social and study networks: Results of a one-day workshop. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37, 293-303.
DOI
|
51 |
Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: Their development and education (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
|
52 |
Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of younf adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72, 1135-1150.
DOI
|
53 |
Schapiro, M., Schneider, B. H., Shore, B. M., Margison, J. A., & Udvari, S. J. (2009). Competitive goal orientations, quality, and stability in gifted and other adolescents' friendships: A test of Sullivan's theory about the harm caused by rivalry. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(2), 71-88. doi:10.1177/0016986208330566
DOI
|
54 |
Simpkins, S. D., Parke, R. D., Flyr, M. L., & Wild, M. N. (2006). Similarities in children's and early adolescents' perceptions of friendship qualities across development, gender, and friendship qualities. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 26(4), 491-508. doi:10.1177/0272431606291941
DOI
|
55 |
Sonnert, G. (2009). Parents who influence their children to become scientists: Effects of gender and parental education. Social Studies of Science, 39(6), 927-941. doi: 10.1177/0306312709335843
DOI
|
56 |
Stewart, E. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement: The influence of school- and individual-level factors on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40(2), 179-204.
DOI
|
57 |
Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A metaanalysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884. doi:10.1037/a0017364
DOI
|
58 |
Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
|
59 |
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F., C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54.
DOI
|
60 |
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning for early careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144. doi: 10.1126/science.1128690
DOI
|
61 |
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003a). Creative intelligence: Toward theoretical integration. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
|
62 |
Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003b). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45-59). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
|
63 |
Wright, L., & Borland, J. H. (1992). A special friend: Adolescent mentors for young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 124-129.
DOI
|
64 |
Zorman, R. (1993). Mentoring and role modeling programs for the gifted. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks & H. A. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 727-742). New York: Pergamon.
|
65 |
Subotnik, R. F., Miserandino, A. D., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1996). Implications of the Olympiad studies for the development of mathematical talent in schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(6), 563-573.
DOI
|
66 |
Piirto, J. (1998). Understanding those who create (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
|