1 |
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD]. (2015). Database-PISA 2015. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-infocus.
|
2 |
Polikoff, M. S. (2015). How well aligned are textbooks to the Common Core Standards in Mathematics? American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1185-1211. doi:10.3102/0002831215584435
DOI
|
3 |
Polikoff, M. S., Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. (2011). How well aligned are state assessments of student achievement with state content standards? American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 965-995. doi:10.3102/0002831211410684
DOI
|
4 |
Resnick, L. B., Rothman, R., Slattery, J. B., & Vranek, J. L. (2004). Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing. Educational Assessment, 9(1-2), 1-27. doi:10.1080/10627197.2004.9652957
DOI
|
5 |
Schmidt, W. H., & Prawat, R. S. (2006). Curriculum coherence and national control of education: issue or non-issue? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(6), 641-658. doi:10.1080/00220270600682804
DOI
|
6 |
Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. C., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525-559. doi:10.1080/0022027042000294682
DOI
|
7 |
Son, J.-W., & Hu, Q. (2016). The initial treatment of the concept of function in the selected secondary school mathematics textbooks in the US and China. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 505-530. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2015.1088084
DOI
|
8 |
Son, J.-W., & Senk, S. L. (2010). How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 117-142. doi:10.1007/s10649-010-9229-6
DOI
|
9 |
Tu, R. (2018). Primary and secondary mathematics selective examinations. In Y. Cao & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), The 21st century mathematics education in China (pp. 453-478). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
|
10 |
Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
11 |
Valverde, G., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
|
12 |
Wang, L., Liu, Q., Du, X., & Liu, J. (2018). Chinese mathematics curriculum reform in the twentyfirst century. In Y. Cao & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), The 21st century mathematics education in China (pp. 53-72). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
|
13 |
Webb, N. L. (1997a). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
|
14 |
Webb, N. L. (1997b). Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. NISE Brief, 1(2), 1-8.
|
15 |
Webb, N. L. (1999). Alignment of science and mathematics standards and assessments in four states (Research Monograph No. 18). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
|
16 |
Webb, N. L. (2007). Issues related to judging the alignment of curriculum standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 7-25. doi:10.1080/08957340709336728
DOI
|
17 |
Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM, 39(5), 459-473. doi:10.1007/s11858-007-0042-3
DOI
|
18 |
Beck, M. D. (2007). Review and other views: "Alignment" as a psychometric issue. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 127-135. doi:10.1080/08957340709336733
DOI
|
19 |
Bhola, D. S., Impara, J. C., & Buckendahl, C. W. (2003). Aligning tests with states' content standards: Methods and issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(3), 21-29. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00134.x
DOI
|
20 |
Cai, J. (2005). U.S. and Chinese teachers' constructing, knowing, and evaluating representations to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 135-169. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0702_3
DOI
|
21 |
Fulmer, G. W. (2011). Estimating critical values for strength of alignment among curriculum, assessments, and instruction. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 36(3), 381-402. doi:10.3102/1076998610381397
DOI
|
22 |
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267. doi:10.3102/0013189x07306523
DOI
|
23 |
Fulmer, G. W., Tanas, J., & Weiss, K. A. (2018). The challenges of alignment for the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1076-1100. doi:doi:10.1002/tea.21481
DOI
|
24 |
Heck, D. J., Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2011). A priority research agenda for understanding the influence of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved from Chapel Hill, NC: http://www.horizon-research.com/reports/2011/CCSSMresearchagenda/research_agenda.pdf
|
25 |
Herman, J. L., & Webb, N. M. (2007). Alignment methodologies. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 1-5. doi:10.1080/08957340709336727
|
26 |
Herman, J. L., Webb, N. M., & Zuniga, S. A. (2007). Measurement issues in the alignment of standards and assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(1), 101-126. doi:10.1080/08957340709336732
DOI
|
27 |
Hong, D. S. (2011). Best known problem solving strategies in ‘high-stakes’ assessments. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(6), 823-829. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2011.562321
DOI
|
28 |
Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2011). Korean college entrance exams: An inside look. The Mathematics Teacher, 105(3), 208-213. doi:10.5951/mathteacher.105.3.0208
DOI
|
29 |
Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2014). A comparison of Korean and American secondary school textbooks: The case of quadratic equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 241-263. doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9512-4.
DOI
|
30 |
Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2018). A comparative analysis of linear functions in Korean and American standards-based secondary textbooks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1025-1051. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2018.1440327
DOI
|
31 |
Hong, D. S., Choi, K. M., Runnalls, C., & Hwang, J. (2018). Do textbooks address known learning challenges in area measurement? A comparative analysis. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(3), 325-354. doi:10.1007/s13394-018-0238-6
DOI
|
32 |
Hwang, H., & Han, H. (2014). Current national mathematics curriculum. Hackensack, UNITED STATES: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd.
|
33 |
Liang, L. L., & Yuan, H. (2008). Examining the alignment of Chinese national physics curriculum guidelines and 12th-grade exit examinations: A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1823-1835. doi:10.1080/09500690701689766
DOI
|
34 |
Liu, X. (1996). Mathematics and science curriculum change in the People's Republic of China. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
|
35 |
Liu, X., & Fulmer, G. (2008). Alignment between the science curriculum and assessment in selected NY State regents exams. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 373-383. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9107-5
DOI
|
36 |
Liu, X., Zhang, B., Liang, L. L., Fulmer, G., Kim, B., & Yuan, H. (2009). Alignment between the physics content standard and the standardized test: A comparison among the United States-New York State, Singapore, and China-Jiangsu. Science Education, 93(5), 777-797. doi:doi:10.1002/sce.20330
DOI
|
37 |
Lu, Q., & Liu, E. (2012). Alignment between high school biology curriculum standard and the standardised tests of four provinces in China. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 149-164. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.645855
DOI
|
38 |
Martone, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1332-1361. doi:10.3102/0034654309341375
DOI
|
39 |
Lv, S.-h., & Cao, C. (2018). The evolution of mathematics curriculum and teaching materials in secondary schools in the twenty-first century. In Y. Cao & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), The 21st century mathematics education in China (pp. 147-169). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
|
40 |
Ma, H., Fulmer, G. W., Liang, L. L., Chen, X., Li, X., & Li, Y. (2013). An alignment analysis of junior high school chemistry curriculum standards and city-wide exit exams in China. In M.-H. Chiu, H.-L. Tuan, H.-K. Wu, J.-W. Lin, & C.-C. Chou (Eds.), Chemistry education and sustainability in the global age (pp. 157-169). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
|
41 |
Ministry of Education in Korea. (2011). The mathematics curriculum standards. Retrieved from Seoul, Korea: http://ncic.go.kr/mobile.revise.board.list.do
|
42 |
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). The TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
|
43 |
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Retrieved from Boston College: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
|
44 |
Nam, J. (2014). Mathematics test in the CSAT. In J. Kim & H. Han (Eds.), Mathematics education in Korea (pp. 289-306). Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
|
45 |
Newton, J., & Kasten, S. (2013). Two models for evaluating alignment of state standards and assessments: Competing or complementary perspectives? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(3), 550-580. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.44.3.0550
DOI
|