Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2021.24.4.189

An Analysis of the Questions Presented in Chapters of Pattern Area in Elementary School Mathematics  

Do, Joowon (Seoul Yongam Elementary School)
Publication Information
Education of Primary School Mathematics / v.24, no.4, 2021 , pp. 189-202 More about this Journal
Abstract
The teacher's questions presented in the problem-solving situation stimulate students' mathematical thinking and lead them to find a solution to the given problem situation. In this research, the types and functions of questions presented in chapters of Pattern area of the 2015 revised elementary school mathematics textbooks were compared and analyzed by grade cluster. Through this, it was attempted to obtain implications for teaching and learning in identifying the characteristics of questions and effectively using the questions when teaching Pattern area. As a result of this research, as grade clsuter increased, the number of questions per lesson presented in Pattern area increased. Frequency of the types of questions in textbooks was found to be high in the order of reasoning questions, factual questions, and open questions in common by grade cluster. In chapters of Pattern area, relatively many questions were presented that serve as functions to help guess, invent, and solve problems or to help mathematical reasoning in the process of finding rules. It can be inferred that these types of questions and their functions are related to the learning content by grade cluster and characteristics of grade cluster. Therefore, the results of this research can contribute to providing a reference material for devising questions when teaching Pattern area and further to the development of teaching and learning in Pattern area.
Keywords
pattern; question; type of question; function of question; textbook analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 한정민, 박만구(2010). 수학적 창의성 신장을 위한 교사의 발문 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 14(3), 865-884.
2 Burns, M. (1985). The role of questioning. The Arithmetic Teacher, 32(6), 14-17.   DOI
3 Cunningham, R. T. (1987). What kind of question is that? In W. Wilen (Ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 67-94). Washington DC: National Education Association.
4 National Council of Teachers of Mathematic (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. VA: Reston.
5 교육부(2015). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호. 서울: 교육부.
6 교육부(2018). 수학 4-1. 서울: 천재교육.
7 교육부(2019c). 수학 6-2. 서울: 천재교육.
8 교육부(2017a). 수학 1-2. 서울: 천재교육.
9 Newmann, (1990). A test of higher-order thinking in social studies: persuasive writing on constitutional issues using NAEP approach. Social Education, 54(4), 369-373.
10 Shahrill, M. (2013). Review of effective teacher questioning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(17), 224-231.
11 Watson, K. & Young, B. (1986). Discourse for Learning inthe Classroom. In S. Murphy (Ed.), Literacy through "language arts": Teaching and learning in context (pp. 39-49). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
12 Vacc, N. N. (1993). Implementing the "professional standards for teaching mathematics": questioning in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Teacher, 41(2), 88-91.
13 Perry, M. VanderStoep, S. W. & Yu, S. L. (1993). Asking questions in first-grade mathematics classes: potential influences on mathematical thought. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 31-40.   DOI
14 Reys, E. R., Lindquist, M., Lamdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2015). Helping children learn mathematic 11EDITION. John Wiley & Sons. 박성선, 김민경, 방정숙, 권점례 공역(2017). 초등교사를 위한 수학과 교수법. 서울: 교우사.
15 Sahin, A. & Kulm, G. (2008). Sixth grade mathematics teachers' intentions and use of probing, guiding, and factual questions. J ournal of mathematics teacher education, 11(3), 221-241.   DOI
16 Wimer J. W., Ridenour, C. S., Thomas, K., & Place A. W. (2001). Higher order teacher questioning of boys and girls in elementary mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 95(2), 84-92.   DOI
17 강완, 장윤영, 정선혜(2011). 수학 수업 발문유형 분석 및 대안 탐색 - 신임 교사 사례 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 14(3). 293-302.
18 권성룡(2007). 초등 수학 교과서의 규칙성과 함수 영역의 활동 고찰. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 10(2), 111-123.
19 남승인(2000). 수학적 사고력 신장을 위한 규칙성 영역의 학습 자료 개발. 수학.과학 교육연구, 23, 91-121.
20 도주원(2021). 초등수학 교과서의 자료와 가능셩 영역에 제시된 발문의 유형과 기능 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 60(3), 265-279.
21 박만구, 김진호(2006). 학습자 중심의 수학 수업에서 교사의 발문 분석. 한국학교수학회논문집, 9(4), 425-457.
22 이선영(2003). 수학 학습에서 발문 유형에 따른 학생의 반응에 관한 연구. 부산교육대학교 석사학위논문.
23 Cotton, K. (1989). Classroom questioning. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory: School improvement research series (SIRS). Retrieved from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/3/cu5.html.
24 이지승(2017). 초등 수학 수업에 나타나는 초임 교사의 발문 유형 분석. 서울교육대학교 석사학위논문.
25 Barnes, D. (1990). Language in the secondary class- room: a study of language interaction in twelve lessons in the first term of secondary education. In D. Barnes, Britton, & H. Rosen(Eds.), Langage, the Learner & the School (pp. 11-77). Baltimore, Md.: Penguin Books.
26 Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics (CCSSM). Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School officers.
27 Manouchehri, A. & Lapp, D. A. (2003). Unveiling student understanding: the role of questioning in instruction. The Mathematics Teacher, 96(8), 562-566.   DOI
28 Brualdi, A. C. (1998). Classroom questions. ERIC/AE Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. Washington DC.
29 강완, 나귀수, 백석윤, 이경화 (2013). 초등수학 교수 단위 사전. 서울: 경문사.
30 백석윤(2016). 수학 문제해결 교육. 서울: 경문사.
31 교육부(2017b). 수학 2-2. 서울: 천재교육.
32 교육부(2019b). 수학 6-1. 서울: 천재교육.
33 교육부(2019a). 수학 5-1. 서울: 천재교육.
34 National Council of Teachers of Mathematic (2000). Principes and standards for school mathematiccs. VA: Reston.
35 Mason, J. (2010). Effective questioning and responding in the mathematics classroom' reworked and updated from: Mason, J. (2002). 'Minding Your Qs and Rs: effective questioning and responding in the mathematics classroom'. Aspects of teaching secondary mathematics: perspectives on practice. London.
36 김성준(2003). 패턴과 일반화를 강조한 대수 접근법 고찰. 학교수학, 5(3), 343-360.
37 박만구(2010). 초등 수학교과서의 창의성 신장을 위한 발문. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 13(1), 25-35.
38 백소영, 김도현, 이경언(2014). 수업 시연에 나타나는 예비 수학교사의 발문 유형과 특성 분석. 교사교육 연구, 53(3), 400-415.