Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2022.61.3.477

Adults' perception of mathematics: A narrative analysis of their experiences in and out of school  

Cho, Eun Young (Mathematics Education, The Graduate School, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Rae Young (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
The Mathematical Education / v.61, no.3, 2022 , pp. 477-497 More about this Journal
Abstract
The rapidly changing world calls for reform in mathematics education from lifelong learning perspectives. This study examines adults' perception of mathematics by reflecting on their experiences of mathematics in and out of school in order to understand what the current needs of adults are. With the two questions: "what experiences do participants have during their learning of mathematics in schools?" and "how do they perceive mathematics in their current life?", we analyzed the semi-structured interviews with 10 adults who have different sociocultural backgrounds using narrative inquiry methodology. As a result, participants tended to accept school mathematics as simply a technique for solving computational problems, and when they had not known the usefulness of mathematical knowledge, they experienced frustration with mathematics in the process of learning mathematics. After formal education, participants recognized mathematics as the basic computation skill inherent in everyday life, the furniture of their mind, and the ability to efficiently express, think, and judge various situations and solve problems. Results show that adults internalized school education to clearly understand the role of mathematics in their lives, and they were using mathematics efficiently in their lives. Accordingly, there was a need to see school education and adult education on a continuum, and the need to conceptualize the mathematical abilities required for adults as mathematical literacy.
Keywords
adult education; mathematical literacy; lifelong learning; perception of mathematics; mathematics education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 CERI (1973). Recurrent education: A strategy for lifelong learning, OECD.
2 Cha, H. & Kim, Y. (2018). A study on the development and the effect of parents' education program on teaching math for children. Journal of Parent Education, 10(2), 137-158.
3 Cho, D., Kim, H. & Kim, H. (2008). Core competencies toward the learning society in the future (Report No. 2008-7-3). Sukmyung Womens University.
4 Cho, E., & Kim, R. (2018). Toward mathematics education for adults in South Korea. In K. Safford-Ramus, J. Maass, & E. Suss-Stepancik (Eds.), Contemporary Research in Adult and Lifelong Learning of Mathematics (pp. 109-124). Springer.
5 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
6 Cho, E. & Kim, R. (2021). Mathematics education as lifelong education. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 25(4), 302-314. http://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2021.25.4.302   DOI
7 Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
8 Encarta (2008). Lifelong learning. http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary)561547417/lifelong_learning.html.
9 Frey, L. A. (1972). An introduction to lifelong education. Journal of Education for Social Work, 8(2), 71-72.   DOI
10 Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identidy: Theory, research, critique. Rowman & Littlefield.
11 Tobias, S. (1993). Overcoming math anxiety. Norton.
12 UNESCO (1972). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. UNESCO.
13 Yu, H., Kim, N., Kim, A., Kim, T., Lee, M., & Jang, S. (2002). The research on the national standards of life skills and quality management for learning system(I). (Report No. RR 2002-19). Korean Educational Development Institute.
14 Yu, H., Kim, T., Lee, S., & Song, S. (2004). Research on the national standards of life competencies and quality management for learning system(III). (Report No. RR 2004-11). Korean Educational Development Institute.
15 Wedge, T. (2010). People's mathematics in working life: Why is it invisible?. ALM International Journal, 5(1), 89-97.
16 Duchhardt, C., Jordan, A., & Ehmke, T. (2017), Adults' use of mathematics and its influence on mathematical competence. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9670-1   DOI
17 Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.   DOI
18 Choe, S., Ku, J., Kim, J., Park, S., Oh, E., Kim, J., & Baek, H. (2013). Strategies for Improving the Affective Characteristics of Korean Students Based on the Results of PISA and TIMSS. (Report No. RRE 2013-18). Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation
19 Coben, D. (2002). Use value and exchange value in discursive domains of adult numeracy teaching. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 11(2), 25.
20 Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elnore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research. (pp. 477-487). Lawrence Eribaum.
21 Connolly, E. (2009). Fun maths for parents. In K. Safford-Ramus (Ed.), A declaration of numeracy: empowering adults through mathematics education (pp. 32-42). DEStech Publications.
22 Ernest, P. (2011). The psychology of learning mathematics: The cognitive, affective and contextual domains of mathematics education. LAP LAMBERT.
23 FitzSimons, G. E. (2019). Adults learning mathematics: transcending boundaries and barriers in an uncertain world. Adults Learning Mathematics: An International Journal, 14(1), 41-52.
24 Gal, I. (2000). Adult numeracy development: Theory, research, practice. Series on literacy: Research, policy, and practice. Hampton.
25 Gill, O., & O'Donoghue, J. (2008). Mathematics support for adult learners. In T. Maguire, N. Colleran, O. Gill & J. O'Donoghue (Eds.), The changing face of adult mathematics education: Learning from the past, planning for the future: Proceedings of ALM-13 (pp. 44-54). University of Limerick.
26 Harris, D., Black, L., Hernandez-Martinez, P., Pepin, B., Williams, J., & TransMaths Team. (2015). Mathematics and its value for engineering students: What are the implications for teaching? International Education in Science and Technology, 46(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.979893   DOI
27 Hoyles, C., Wolf, A., Molyneux-Hodgson, S., & Kent, P. (2002). Mathematical skills in the workplace: Final report to the Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. Institute of Education, University of London.
28 Hong, Y (2007). How will be life competences developed and utilized? (Report No. RM 2007-86) Korean Educational Development Institute
29 Kim, A., Kim, N., Kim, T., Lee, S., & Jung, H. (2003). Research on the national standard of life competencies and quality management for learning system(II). (Report No. RR 2003-15). Korean Educational Development Institute.
30 Kim, S., Kim, B., & Lee, J. (2014). Mathematics education and affective domain. Kyeongmun.
31 Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K. (1989). Self-regulation and metamotivation: Computational mechanism, development, and assessment. In R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerman, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, motivation and methodology (pp. 343-374). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32 Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.   DOI
33 Lee, J., & Yi, G. (2021). Pre-service teachers' conceptions about considering the realistic contexts in the word problems. The Mathematical Education, 60(4), 509-527. http://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2021.60.4.509   DOI
34 Lee, H., & Ko, H. (2018). A study for numeracy program development of the elderly generation. Communications of Mathematical Education. 32(4), 519-536. http://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2018.32.4.519   DOI
35 Lee, K., Rim, H., Park, I., Seo, M., Kim, B. (2016). A Study on development of the survey items for affective domain in mathematics of NAEA. (Report No. ORM 2016-26-1). Korean Educational Development Institute.
36 Lim, Y., Choi, D., & Park, M. (2008) A study on the core competencies required by the job world in the future society. (Report No. RRC 2008-7-2). Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
37 Ministry of Education & National Institute for Lifelong Education (2019). 2017 Adult literacy skills survey. (Report No. TR2019-3). National Institute for Lifelong Education.
38 Na, S., Jang, S., Jung, C. Seo, W., Kim, J., Lee, S. (2004). Development of national competency standards(Year 2). Human Resources Development Service of Korea. Retrieved from https://ncs.go.kr/th06/bbs_lib_view.do?libDstinCd=15&libSeq=20160306130732629
39 National Institute of Korean Language (n.d.). Standard Korean dictionary. https://stdict.korean.go.kr/search/searchResult.do
40 Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods :integrating theory and practice, (4th ed.). SAGE.
41 Hutchins, R. M. (1968). Learning society. Praeger.
42 Han, J. (2017). A study of parent education program focused on early childhood mathematics education. Early Childhood Education Research & Review, 21(2), 465-484.
43 Kim, S. (2019). A study on the design of mathematics education program for foreign students majoring in natural science and engineering at university in Korea. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 9(5), 147-157. http://doi.org/10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.5.015   DOI
44 Ko, H. (2007). The possibilities and prospects of mathematics education as older adult's education. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 10(2), 173-185.
45 Lee, J., & Chae, J. (2015). Potentials and limits of the new adult literacy education. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 11(3), 59-84.   DOI
46 OECD(2000). Literacy in the information age: Final report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. OECD.
47 OECD (2019a). PISA 2018 Assessment and analytical framework. PISA, OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.   DOI
48 OECD (2019b). The survey of adult skills: Reader's companion, (3rd ed.). OECD.
49 Park, J. & Han, S. (2021). Exploring the factors of situational interest in learning mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 60(4), 555-580. http://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2021.60.4.555   DOI
50 Park, J. & Pyo, Y. (2013). Improvement strategies of teaching methods for university basic mathematics education courses by ability grouping. Communications of Mathematical Education, 27(1), 19-37.   DOI
51 Safford-Ramus, K., Kumar Misra, P., & Maguire, T. (2016). The troika of adult learners, lifelong learning, and mathematics. Springer.
52 Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1991). What work requires of schools: a SCANS report for America 2000. U.S. Department of Labor.
53 Sharples, M. (2000). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers and Education, 34, 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00044-5   DOI
54 Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jakson, D. (1996). Individual difference in affective and conative functions. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243-310). Macmillan.
55 Kirsch, I. S. (2005). Theoretical frameworks for specific domains included in ALL. In T. S. Murray, Y. Clermont, & M. Binkley (Eds.), Measuring adult literacy and life skills: New frameworks for assessment (pp. 87-191). Statistics Canada.