Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2022.61.2.273

The structure of teacher discourse in the process of solving mathematic problems  

Choi, Sang-Ho (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
The Mathematical Education / v.61, no.2, 2022 , pp. 273-286 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the teacher's discourse structure in the process of solving mathematics problems based on the communication between teachers and students. To achieve this goal, we observed a semester class by a teacher with experience who practiced a teaching method that creates mathematical meanings based on students' participation in class. In order to solve problems based on the participation of students in each class, the similarities between the processes of creating the structure of the discourse were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, the teacher was able to focus on the goal in the process of starting a discourse, and in the process of developing the discourse, the problem was solved by focusing on understanding the problem. In the process of arranging the discourse, the problem-solving process and the core of the result is summarized. Based on the possibility of generalization of the teacher discourse structure, it will be able to provide practical help in the process of implementing a teaching method that solves mathematics problems by communicating with students in the future.
Keywords
problem solving; the structure of teacher discourse; start; develop; organize;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Glaser, B. F., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
2 Hong, J., & Park, D. (2013). The research on competitive strategies of mobile contents platforms based on network externality. The e-Business Studies, 14(5), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.15719/geba.14.5.201312.113   DOI
3 Kang, O., Hwang, S., Kwon, E., Jeong, K., & Kim, Y. (2014). Middle school mathematics 1. Doosandonga.
4 Gonzalez, G., & DeJarnette, A. (2015). Teachers' and students' negotiation moves when teachers scaffold group work. Cognition and Instruction, 33(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.987058   DOI
5 Choi, S. (2020d). The structure of teacher discourse based on the error of solving mathematic problems of students in the process of sharing the results of peer mentoring activities. School Mathematics, 22(2), 277-292. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2020.06.22.2.277   DOI
6 Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004   DOI
7 Kim, D., Shin, J., Lee, J., Lim, W., Lee, Y., & Choi, S. (2019). Conceptualizing discursive teaching capacity: A case study of a middle school mathematics teacher. School Mathematics, 21(2), 291-318. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.06.21.2.291   DOI
8 Cha, S. (2001). A study on error analysis and correction according to the level of learning ability in letters and expression units [Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education Graduate School].
9 Kim, E. (2013). Strategies for creating an ecosystem based on open platforms. Journal of The Korean Institute of Communication Sciences, 30(9), 59-64.
10 Kim, S. (2011). Error analysis and correction measures that occur in 7-A 'letters and expressions' [Master's thesis, Korea University Graduate School].
11 Yang, M. (2009). Case study on teaching mathematics slow-learners by mathematical visualization [Master's thesis, Korea National University of Education Graduate School of Education].
12 Choi, S., & Kim, D. (2017). Effects of a communicational approach to teacher education on cognitive changes in mathematical beliefs. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 33(4), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2017.33.4.25   DOI
13 Choi, S. (2020a). Interaction patterns between teachers-students and teacher's discourse structures in mathematization processes. The Mathematical Education, 59(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2020.59.1.17   DOI
14 Choi, S. (2020c). Quantitative and qualitative analysis of teacher-student interaction in student engagement mathematics classes. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 30(2), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.05.30.2.227   DOI
15 Correnti, R., Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Scherrer, J., McKeown, M., Greeno, J. & Ashley, K. (2015). Improving teaching at scale: Design for the scientific measurement and learning of discourse practice. Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue. AERA, 284. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_25
16 Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9   DOI
17 Choi, S. (2020b). Teacher-student interaction patterns and teacher's discourse structures in understanding mathematical word problem. The Mathematical Education, 59(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2020.59.2.101   DOI
18 Kwon, H., Na, Y., & Park, J. (2013). Platform based of the major attribute research for the service ecosystem construction. Journal of Information Technology Service, 12(4), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2013.12.4.461   DOI
19 Park, S. (2004). Effect of calculation process correction in calculating rational numbers [Master's Thesis, Ewha Womans University Graduate School of Education].
20 Williams, S., & Baxter, J. (1996). Dilemmas of discourse oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1086/461847   DOI
21 Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2003). Philosophical investigations: The German text, with a revised English translation(3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Malden, Blackwell.