Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2021.60.1.77

The characteristics of lesson design prepared by pre-service teachers according to the structural changes of lesson design template  

Lee, Seon Young (Baekseok high school)
Han, Sunyoung (Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
The Mathematical Education / v.60, no.1, 2021 , pp. 77-110 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, a student participation-centered class based on student mathematical thinking as a the meaningful subject was called a student thinking-based math class. And as a way to support these classes, I paid attention to lesson design. For student thinking-based mathematics classes, it is necessary not only to anticipate student thinking and teacher feedback, but also to plan in advance how to properly arrange and connect expected student responses. The student thinking-based lesson design template proposed in this study is a modified three-step(introduction, main topic, summary) lesson design template. The reason for revising the existing design template is that it has limitation that it cannot focus on mathematical thinking. Using the conceptual framework of student thinking-based mathematics lesson as a lens, the difference between the three-step lesson design prepared by pre-service teachers and the students' thinking-based lesson design prepared by the same pre-service teachers was analyzed. As a result of planning lessons using the student thinking-based lesson design, more attention was paid to the cognitive and social engagement of students. In addition, emphasis was placed in the role of teachers as formative facilitator. This study is of significant in that it recognizes the importance of classes focusing on students' mathematical thinking and provides tools to plan math classes based on students' thinking.
Keywords
mathematical thinking; lesson design;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jonassen, D. H. (2008). Instructional design as design problem solving: an iterative process. Educational Technology, 48(3), 21-26.
2 Leon, J., Medina-Garrido, E. & Munez, J. L. (2017). Teaching quality in math class: the development of a scale and the analysis of its relationship with engagement and achievement. Front. Psychol. 8:895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00895.   DOI
3 Moallem, M.(1993). An experienced teacher's model of thinking and teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
4 Owens, K. (2008). Identity as a mahtematical thinker. Mathematics Teacher Educational and Development, 9, 36-50.
5 Rymes, B. (2009). Classroom discussion analysis: a tool for critical reflection by Betsy Rymes. Kim, J. H. Translator, Trans. (2011). 말이 열리는 교실: 교실수업 개선을 위한 담화분석. Seoul: CommunicationBooks.
6 Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How to think: a theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational application. Lee, K. H. Translator, Trans (2013). 수학수업, 설명을 만나다. Seoul: Kyungmoon.
7 Smith, M. S., Bill, V., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Thinking through a lesson: successfully implementing high-level tasks. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 132-138.   DOI
8 Smith, M. S. & J. Cartier (2009). "The lesson template." Created under the auspices of the collaborative, technology-enhanced lesson planning as an organizational routine for continuous, School-Wide Instructional Projet, directed ty M. J. Stein and J. Russell at the University of Pittsburgh, 2009.
9 Smith, M. S. & Sherin, M. G. (2019). The five practices in practice: successfully orchestrating mathematics discussions in your middle school classroom. NY : Corwin mathematics publishing.
10 Smith, M. S. & Stein, M. J. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussion. Reston, VA: NCTM. Pang, J. S. Translator, Trans. (2013). 효과적인 수학적 논의를 위해 교사가 알아야 할 5가지 관행. Seoul: Kyungmoon.
11 Stein, M. K. & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: from research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 268-275.   DOI
12 Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, S. A. (2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: a casebook for professional development (2nd ed.) Kim, N. G., Joe, W. Y., & Kwon, S. R. Translator, Trans.(2017). 수학과제가 수학수업을 만났을 때. Seoul: Kyungmoon.
13 van Es, E. A. & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571-596.
14 Stockero, S. L., Rupnow, R. & Pascoe, A. E. (2017). Learning to notice important student mathematical thinking in complex classroom interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 384-395.   DOI
15 Sullivan, P., Clarke, D. & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. Lee, K. H. & Kim, D. W. Translator, Trans. (2016). 수학 수업 이야기: 수학, 과제, 학습의 삼중주. Seoul: Kyungmoon.
16 Taylan, R. D. (2018). The relationship between pre-service mathematics teachers' focus on student thinking in lesson analysis and lesson planning tasks. Int J of Sci and Math Edue, 16, 337-356.   DOI
17 Yang, Y., & Ricks, T. E. (2013). Chinese lesson study: Developing classroom instruction through collaborations in school-based teaching research group activities. In Y. Li & R.Huang (Eds.), How Chinese teach mathematics and improve teaching (pp. 51-65). NY: Routledge.
18 Kim, J. W. (2014). An analysis of lesson plan and implementation based on the thinking through a lesson protocol in elementary mathematics instrucion: focused on the area of plane figure at fifth grade. Korea National University of Education, Master's thesis, Ghung-Buk, Korea.
19 Kim, G. Y. & Jeon, M. H. (2017). Exploring teachers' pedagogical design capacity: how mathematics teachers plan and design their mathematics lesson. The Mathematical Education, 56(4), 365-385.   DOI
20 Kim, J. S. & Lee, S. J. (2017). Characteristics of pre-service secondary mathematics teachers' anticipating through the task dialogue activity. Journal of educational research in mathematics, 28(3), 511-536.
21 Kwon, O. N., Pang, J. S., Park, J. H., Park, J. H., Oh, H. M., & Jo, H. M. (2013). Exploring the possibility of using lesson play in pre-service teacher education. School Mathematics, 15(4), 819-832.
22 Pang, J. S. (2006). Successes and difficulties in transforming elementary mathematics classrooms to student-centered instruction. The Mathematical Education, 45(4), 459-479.
23 Pang, J. S., Kim, J. W. (2013). An Analysis of 5 Practices for Effective Mathematics Communication by Elementary School Teachers. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 17(1), 143-164.
24 Kang, J. C. (2018). A case study on instruction design and practice using creative problem solving: for pre-teacher. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 28(2), 315-345.   DOI
25 Park, I. W. (2015). A conceptual analysis on teaching and instruction, instructional theory, and instructional design theory. Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 633-653.   DOI
26 Park, K. Y. (2007). Instructional design model and practice: a survey of design practice. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 1-30.   DOI
27 Lee, J. H. & Lee, G. D. (2015). Beyond the certifier of right or wrong answer: what and how could pre-service teachers learn from a lesson observation course?. Journal of educational research in mathematics, 25(4), 549-569.
28 Park, K. Y. (2008). A case study on instructional planning process of teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(3), 379-405.   DOI
29 Park, K. Y. (2018). The effects of instructional design model based on the nature of design thinking on secondary pre-service teacher's instructional design activities. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(3), 191-214.
30 Lee, M, O. (2018). A study on the formation of teaching expertise of elementary school teachers. Seoul National University of Education, Doctoral dissertation. Seoul. Korea.
31 Lim, C. I. (1994). Formative research on an instructional theroy for conceptual understanding. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 45-63.   DOI
32 Jeong, H. H. (2009). A study on the insturcion design experiences of elementary school teacher. Korean Society of Educational Technology, 25(3), 157-191.
33 Choi, H. S. (2020). Exploration of instructional design changes of pre-service mathematics teachers by restructuring the lesson plan. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 23(1), 159-177.
34 Han, C. R., Kim, H. J., Kwon, O. N. (2018). Teacher Noticing on Students' Reasoning of Statistical Variability. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 21(2), 183-206.   DOI
35 Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Linn, J. S., Hofkens, T. L., Sugn, H., Parr, A. & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5-15.   DOI
36 Han, C. R., Kim, H. J. & Kwon, O. N. (2018). Teacher noticing on students' reasoning of statistical variability. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 21(2), 183-206.   DOI
37 Anthony, G., Hunter, J. & Hunter, R. (2015). Prospective teachers development of adaptive expertise. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 108-117.   DOI
38 Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 17-34). New York, NY: Routledge.
39 Forbes, C. T. & Davis, E. A. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers' curriculum design and development of pedagogical design capacity for inquiry : an activity-theoretical perspective. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. 1-72.
40 Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D. & Batttey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students' mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380-392.   DOI
41 Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Jin, Y. E. Translator, Trans (2008). 교육 상황에서 질적 연구 수행하기. Seoul: Hakjisa.
42 Choy, B. H. (2013). Productive mathematic noticing: what it is and why it matters. In V. Steinle, L. Ball & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of 36th annual conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. (pp. 186-193). Melbourne, Victoria: MERGA.
43 Brown, A. H. & Green, T. D. (2016). The Essentials of instructional design: connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. NY: Routledge.
44 Carr-Chellman, A. A., & Reigeluth, R. M.(2002). Whistling in the dark? Instructional design and technology in the schools. In Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V.(Eds.). Trend and issues in instructional design and technology(pp. 239-255). NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
45 Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, & Anderson, N. C. (2013). Classroom discussions in math: a teacher's guide for using talk moves to support the common core and more, grades K-6. Kim. J. H. et al. Translator, Trans. (2016). 수학 교실 토론. Seoul: Kyungmoon.
46 Choy, B. H. (2014). Teachers' productive mathematical noticing during lesson preparation. In Nicol, C., Liljedahl, P., Oesterle, S., & Allan, D. (Eds) Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA, 36(2). pp. 297-304. Vancouver, Canada: PME.
47 Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. a. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.   DOI
48 Helme, S. & Clarke, D. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classrroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13, 133-153.   DOI
49 Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Fuson, K. C. (1997). Making sense teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Kim, S. H., Park, Y. H., Lee, K. H., & Han, D. H. Translator, Trans. (2004). 어떻게 이해하지?. Seoul: Kyungmoon
50 Jacobs, V. R. & Empson, S. (2016). Responding to children's mathematical thinking in the moment: an emerging framework of teaching moves. ZDM: the international journal on mathematics education, 48(1), 185-197.   DOI
51 Bahr, D. L. & Bahr, K. (2017). Engaging all students in mathematical discussions. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(6), 350-359.   DOI
52 Choy, B. H. & Dindyal, J. (2017). Snapshots of productive noticing: orchestrating experiences using typical problems. In A. Downton, S. Livy, & J. Hall (Eds.), 40 years on: We are still learning! Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 157-164). Melbourne: MERGA.
53 Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W. & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 25(2), 119-142.   DOI