Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2011.50.3.263

A Study on an Instructional Model and Statistical Thinking Levels to Help Minority Students with Low-SES and Learning Difficulty  

Baek, Jung-Hwan (The Graduate School of Dankook University)
ChoiKoh, Sang-Sook (Dept. of Math. Education, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Mathematical Education / v.50, no.3, 2011 , pp. 263-284 More about this Journal
Abstract
We took note of the fact that there were not many studies on improvement of mathematics learning in the field of statistics for the minority students from the families who belonged to the Low-SES. This study was to help them understand the concepts and principles of mathematics, motivate them for mathematics learning, and have them feel familiar with it. The subjects were 12 students from the low-SES families among the sophomores of 00 High School in Gyeonggi-do. Although it could not be achieved effectively in the short-term of learning for the slow learners, their understanding of basic concepts and confidence, interests and concerns in statistical learning were remarkably changed, compared to their work in the beginning period. Our discourse classes using various topics and examples were well perceived by the students whose performance was improved up to the 3rd thinking level of Mooney's framework. Also, a meaningful instructional model for slow learners(IMSL) was found through the discourse.
Keywords
learning difficulty; low-SES; statistics education; direct instruction; mooney's framework;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Paul, D. E. & Donald, P. K. (2001). Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. 교사를 위한 수업전략. 임청환․권성기 역, 서울: (주)시그마프레스.
2 Ron, P. (1999). Spanish-English language issue in the mathematics classroom, In L. Ortiz-Franco, N. Hernandez, & Y. dela Cruz(Eds.), Changing the Faces of Mathematics: Perspectives on Latinos (pp. 21-33). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics..
3 Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann and G. Vokar, Trans.). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press. (Original work published in 1934).
4 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner and Ellen Souberman(Eds.), Cambridge, Mass: the Harvard University Press.
5 Lubienski, S. (2000). Problem solving as a means towards mathematics for all: An exploratory look through the class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454-482.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Mcleod, J. D. & Shanahan, M. J. (1993). Poverty, Parenting, and children's mental health. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 351-366.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Mooney, E. S. (2002). A framework for characterizing middle school students' thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(1), 23-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Moore, D. (1998). Statistics among the liberal arts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93(444), 1253-1259.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
10 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
11 Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E. & Wheatly, G. (1993). Introduction: Background of the research. In T. Wood, P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & D. Dillon (Eds.), Rethinking elementary school mathematics: Insights and issues (pp. 1-6). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12 Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.   DOI
13 Gagne, R. M. (1963). Learning and proficiency in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 56(8), 620-626.
14 Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM standards. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 5-23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
15 Bennett, C. I. (1995). Comprehensive Multicultural Education Theory and Practice. 김옥순 외 2인 공역(2009). 다문화교육 이론과 실제. 서울: 학지사.
16 Hudson, P., Miller. S. P. & Butler, F. (2006). Adapting and merging explicit instruction within reform based mathematical classrooms. American Secondary Education, 35(1), 19-32.
17 Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langtall, C. W.; Mooney, E. S.; Perry, B. & Putt, I. J. (2000). A framework for characterizing students' statistical thinking. Mathematics Thinking and Learning, 2, 269-307.   DOI
18 한국교육과정평가원 (1998). 학습부진아 지도 프로그램 개발 연구. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
19 Bernstein. B. (1977). Class, Codes and Control, Vol 3, 2nd edition(pp. 207-210), Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20 Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 239-258.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Bourdieu. P. (1973). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction(pp. 71-80), Richard Brown.
22 Cobb, P. W. & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics Statistics and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly 104(9), 615-630. Mathematical Association of America,
23 이재연.백정재(1997). 빈곤아동이 지각한 가정의 심리적 환경과 부적응 행동과의 관계. 생활과학연구지 12(1), 71-93.
24 김인희 (2004). 교육 복지 정책의 성공 조건. 교육정책포럼.
25 정은혜 (2005). 저소득층 아동의 지능연구. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.
26 조윤동 (2002). 비고츠키 이론의 수학교육적 적용에 관한 연구. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문.
27 한국교육개발원 (2005). 도시 저소득층 평생학습 활성화 방안 연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
28 류성림 (1999). 수학 학습 부진아의 개별화 교수방법. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>. 3(2), 115-131.
29 심정현 (2002). 문제중심수업이 개념 형성 및 수학적 성향에 미치는 효과. 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
30 박혜숙.박기양.김영국.박규홍.박윤범 (2004). 중학교 수학 학습부진아의 기피 현상. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>. 18(1), 183-190.
31 윤기옥.정문성.최영환.강문봉.노석구 (2009). 수업모형. 서울: 동문사.
32 이건만 (2006). Marx주의 교육사회학. 서울: 교육사회학.
33 이경화.지은정.고은성.강현영.신보미.이동환.이은경.이정연.박민선.박미미 역 (2010). 통계적 사고의 의미와 교육. 서울: 경문사.
34 이은주 (2000). 저소득층 중3 여학생의 부적응 문제 감소를 위한 집단사회사업 활동에 관한 사례연구: 위기이론을 중심으로. 숭실대학교석사학위논문.
35 고상숙 (2009). 다양성 배경을 지닌 학생들의 학습현장에서 수학교육연구에 관한 문헌고찰, 한국학교수학회논문집 12(4), 389-409.
36 교육인적자원부(2004). 참여복지 5개년 계획(교육복지 부문): 참여정부 교육복지 종합계획. 서울: 교육인적자원부.
37 김경근 (2005). 한국 사회의 교육격차 사회양극화 경향과 교육격차 해소방안. 전국교육연구소 네트워크 2005.
38 강현희 (2008). 담론을 통한 수학적 개념발달에 관한 사례연구. 단국대학교 박사학위 논문.
39 김애화.신동희.고상숙 (2010). 저소득층 학생, 학부모, 저소득층 학생을 가르치는 교사의 수학과 과학교수에 대한 인식, 한국교육 37(2), 57-87.