Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.9.202109.53

Distribution of Environmental Awareness Applying an Ecological Theory of Ted Hughes  

CHO, Jongwhee (Department of English Language and Literature, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
Journal of Distribution Science / v.19, no.9, 2021 , pp. 53-64 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The current study aims and reviews the current state of research in green awareness' distribution structure using the ecological theory of Ted Hughes who was regarded as one of the best English poets of the 20 century. Ted poetry has innovated ecological distribution. It has inspired so many young people to have a positive energy impact on the environment. Research design, data and methodology: Action research design is an approach used extensively in qualitative content analysis. This design starts by adopting an exploratory claim that develops the research objectives, hence instigating the action process, which involves several strategies. This type of design involves a cyclic process of stance then action. Results: According to the investigation, there are nine solutions that can deal with the green distribution based on previous literature review, applying an ecological approach of Ted Hughes to green awareness distribution. The solutions figured out that Ted's novels had an innovative impact on the environment as it is clear that information is given to society. Conclusions: It is observed that having a highly professional environment is good enough for a structure to go green. But, on the other hand, polluting our environment can endanger species by causing health diseases and environmental problems.
Keywords
Green Awareness Distribution; Ecological Distribution System; Innovative Environmental Supply;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Woo, E. J. (2021). The Relationship between Green Marketing and Firm Reputation: Evidence from Content Analysis. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 455-463.   DOI
2 Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research, 101(August), 697-706.   DOI
3 Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1012-1026.   DOI
4 Zhao, Y., Feng, T., & Shi, H. (2018). External involvement and green product innovation: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1167-1180.   DOI
5 Williams, C. (2007). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3), 65-72.
6 De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., & Cassia, L. (2015). Product innovation in family versus non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1-36.   DOI
7 Awan, U., Nauman, S., & Sroufe, R. (2021). Exploring the effect of buyer engagement on green product innovation: Empirical evidence from manufacturers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 463-477.   DOI
8 Baby, K. T. The Significance of Ecological References in the Poetry of Ted Hughes: A Critical Analysis. Significance, 7(18), 2020.
9 Bitektine, A. (2008). Prospective case study design: qualitative method for deductive theory testing. Organizational research methods, 11(1), 160-180.   DOI
10 Burns, M. K. (2011). School psychology research: Combining ecological theory and prevention science. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 132-139.   DOI
11 Lee, J. H. (2021). Effect of Sports Psychology on Enhancing Consumer Purchase Intention for Retailers of Sports Shops: Literature Content Analysis. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(4), 5-13.   DOI
12 Chang, C. H. (2018). How to enhance green service and green product innovation performance? The roles of inward and outward capabilities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 411-425.   DOI
13 Chakrabarti, A. K. (1974). The role of champion in product innovation. California management review, 17(2), 58-62.   DOI
14 Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016). The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, (Part B), 384-391.
15 Chang, C. H. (2016). The determinants of green product innovation performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(2), 65-76.   DOI
16 Chapman, R., & Hyland, P. (2004). Complexity and learning behaviors in product innovation. Technovation, 24(7), 553-561.   DOI
17 Choi, D. H. (2021). Digital Forensic: Challenges and Solution in the Protection of Corporate Crime. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 12(6), 47-55.   DOI
18 Buhl, A. (2018). Do it yourself-a lean startup toolbox for employee-driven green product innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 22(4-5), 526-544.   DOI
19 Coghlan, D., & Shani, A. R. (2005). Roles, politics, and ethics in action research design. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 18(6), 533-546.   DOI
20 Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.   DOI
21 Guoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., & Hailiang, Z. (2013). Stakeholders' influences on corporate green innovation strategy: a case study of manufacturing firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(1), 1-14.   DOI
22 Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. A companion to qualitative research, 1(2), 159-176.
23 Schiederig, T., Tietze, F., & Herstatt, C. (2012). Green innovation in technology and innovation management-an exploratory literature review. R&d Management, 42(2), 180-192.   DOI
24 Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-toorganization problems. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1120-1153.   DOI
25 Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.   DOI
26 Reddick, Y. (2017). Ted Hughes: Environmentalist and Ecopoet. Springer International Publishing.
27 Hughes, P. W. (2017). Between semelparity and iteroparity: empirical evidence for a continuum of modes of parity. Ecology and evolution, 7(20), 8232-8261.   DOI
28 Ilg, P. (2019). How to foster green product innovation in an inert sector. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(2), 129-138.   DOI
29 Kohlbacher, F. (2006) The Use of Qualitative Content Analysis in Case Study Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7 (1). 1-30.
30 Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.   DOI
31 Lau, C. M., & Ngo, H. Y. (2004). The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation. International business review, 13(6), 685-703.   DOI
32 Lee, K. H., & Kim, J. W. (2011). Integrating suppliers into green product innovation development: an empirical case study in the semiconductor industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(8), 527-538.   DOI
33 Maddock, I. (1999). The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshwater biology, 41(2), 373-391.   DOI
34 Melander, L. (2017). Achieving sustainable development by collaborating in green product innovation. Business strategy and the environment, 26(8), 1095-1109.   DOI
35 Melander, L. (2018). Customer and supplier collaboration in green product innovation: External and internal capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(6), 677-693.   DOI
36 Noci, G., & Verganti, R. (1999). Managing 'green product innovation in small firms. R&d Management, 29(1), 3-15.   DOI
37 Li, Y., Tong, Y., Ye, F., & Song, J. (2020). The choice of the government green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs product subsidy. International Journal of Production Research, 58(16), 4932-4946.   DOI
38 Olson, E. L. (2013). Perspective: the green innovation value chain: a tool for evaluating the diffusion prospects of green products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 782-793.   DOI
39 Parthasarthy, R., & Hammond, J. (2002). Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effects of the innovation process. Journal of engineering and technology management, 19(1), 75-91.   DOI
40 Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146-165.   DOI
41 Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr, R. J. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26(1), 47-75.   DOI
42 Song, W., Wang, G. Z., & Ma, X. (2020). Environmental innovation practices and green product innovation performance: A perspective from organizational climate. Sustainable Development, 28(1), 224-234.   DOI
43 Sung, I. (2021). Interdisciplinary Literaure Analysis between Cosmetic Container Design and Customer Purchasing Intention. The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 12(3), 21-29.   DOI
44 Twiddy, I. (2009). Community Poems: Ted Hughes and the Eclogue. English, 58(222), 243-263.   DOI