Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2016.26.2.389

Fun Factors of the Classes for the Gifted Based on Concept Mapping Approach  

Yun, Jahwan (Incheon National University)
Han, Kisoon (Incheon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.26, no.2, 2016 , pp. 389-404 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research aims to build a concept map reflecting gifted elementary students' perception on fun factors of the classes for the gifted. Data for this research was gathered through brainstorming of 80 students currently attending classes for the gifted. 10 of them were selected as focus group for classification and evaluation, and 140 gifted-class students were asked of the fun factors for level of agreement after concept map analysis. Results of the research were, first, 46 final statements about fun factors which are categorized into 6 sub-categories ('the gifted class teacher's encouragement and feedback', 'confidence and chance', 'teamwork and intimacy with gifted friends', 'fulfilling, beneficial, and rewarding feeling', 'new and special experiments', 'qualitatively different class level and learning environment'). Second, the gifted students showed highest level of agreement on 'new and special experiments' category among the 6 sub-categories. Implication of this research on the field has been discussed.
Keywords
Fun factors; Classes for the gifted; Concept mapping; Gifted education in elementary level;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 강대현, 박영석 (2002). 학교 교육 내실화 방안 연구(II). 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
2 권순재(2012). 온라인 커뮤니티에서 송부와 게임의 재미와 플로우 관계. 정보시스템연구, 21(2), 161-180.
3 김상우, 한기순 (2012). 개념도를 통해서 본 고등학교 영재학생의 학업부정행위에 관한 인식. 영재교육연구, 23(1), 67-87.   DOI
4 김정운 (2011). 노는 만큼 성공한다. 파주: (주)21세기북스.
5 김주훈, 최승헌, 강대현, 곽영순, 유정애, 양종모, 이주섭, 최원윤, 김영애(2003). 학교교육의 내실화 방안 연구: 좋은 수업 사례에 대한 질적접근. 열린교육연구. 11(1), 43-61.
6 김지영 (2007). 네트워크 성과측정 기획을 위한 개념도 연구법 적용가능성. 한국사회복지학, 59(3), 281-304.
7 박승미 (2013). 재미있는 사회과 수업사례연구. 석사학위논문. 한국교원대학교.
8 박영원 (2012). 시각 문화콘텐츠 분석에 관한 연구. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 12(2), 17-181.
9 박인호, 서예원, 한기순, 정현철, 최호성, 이상희 (2013). 영재교육 10년의 정량적, 정성적 성과 분석. 한국과학창의재단.
10 석임복, 강이철 (2007). Csikszentmihalyi의 몰입 요소에 근거한 학습몰입 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구. 교육공학연구, 23(1), 121-154.
11 성창훈, 김병준 (1996). 청소년 운동선수의 스포츠 참가동기 심층분석. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 7(1), 153-171.
12 신재봉 (2008). 초등학교 학생들의 스포츠참여 및 체육수업 만족도 조사. 석사학위논문. 한국교원대학교.
13 윤홍미, 안신호, 이승혜(1996). 우리를 즐겁게 하는 것들: 재미 유발요소에 대한 탐색적 연구. '96 연차대회 학술발표집. 한국심리학회, p. 492.
14 이현비(2004). 재미의 경계. 서울: 지성사.
15 정준환 (2012). PBL에 나타난 재미에 관한 질적 탐구: 3S-Fun. 박사학위논문. 경희대학교.
16 조은미 (2007). 좋은 수업에 대한 초등학교 교사들의 인식. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교.
17 차석빈, 김홍범, 오홍철, 윤지환, 김우곤(2008). 사례를 통해 본 다변량 분석의 이해. 서울: 백산출판사.
18 최선영, 여상인(2011). 초등과학 영재학급 학생의 영재학급 교육에 대한 만족도 조사. 과학교육논총, 24, 37-47.
19 Bucher, C. C., Shiver, J. S., & Bucher, R. D. (1984). Recreation for today's society. NY: Prentice Hall.
20 Cohn, P. J. (1991). An exploratory study on peak performance in golf. The Sport Psychologist, 5(1), 1-14.   DOI
21 Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
22 Henderson, K., Glancy, M., & Little, S. (1999). Putting the fun into physical activity. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 70(8), 43-49.
23 Csikzentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life toward a theory of emergent motivation. Developmental Perspectives on Motivation, 40(1), 57-97.
24 Gol, A. R., & Cook, S. W. (2004). Exploring the underlying dimensions of coping: A concept mapping approach. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 155-171.   DOI
25 Goodyear, R. K., Tracey, T. J., Claiborn, C., Lichtenberg, D., & Wampold, B. E. (2005). Idographic concept mapping in counseling psychology research: Conceptual overview, methodology, and illustration. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 236-242.   DOI
26 Iran-Nejad, A. (1987). Cognitive and affective cause of interest and liking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 120-130.   DOI
27 Izard, E. C. (1991). The Psychology of emotion. New York: Plenum Press.
28 Johnsen, J. A., Biegel, D. E. & Shafran, R. (2000). Concept mapping in mental health. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(1), 67-75.   DOI
29 Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluating. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30 Kelly, J. R. (1987). Freedom to be: A new psychology of leisure. NY: Mac Millan.
31 Kintsch, W. (1980). Learning from text levels of comprehension or why would read a story anyway. Poetics, 9(1), 7-98.
32 Koster, R. (2004). A theory of fun for game design. Scottsdale, AZ: Paraglyph.
33 Schraw, G. (1997). Situational interest in literacy text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 436-456.   DOI
34 Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value. In M. Clark & S. Fiske (Eds.), Affects and cognition(pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35 Paulson, B. L. & Worth, M. (2002). Counseling for suicide: Client perception. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(1), 86-93.   DOI
36 Podilchak, W. (1991). Distinction of fun, enjoyment, and leisure. Leisure Studies, 10(2), 133-148.   DOI
37 Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An Instroduction to Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1-16.   DOI