Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.3.631

Past and Present of Science High School Graduates: Comparison of Productivity in Science Field Based on High School Academic Achievement  

Ahn, Doe-Hee (Chung-Ang University)
Hong, Ah-Jeong (Chung-Ang University)
Cho, Seok-Hee (St. John's University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.21, no.3, 2011 , pp. 631-658 More about this Journal
Abstract
The impact of the academic achievements of science high school graduates during the science high school period on their creative productivity, higher education, occupation, and income were investigated with 244 science high school graduates who belonged either to top 30% or bottom 30% in terms of their high school GPA. The factors contributed to the choice of current occupations and life were also investigated through retrospective approach. Survey questionnaire was administered to 244 adults who graduated from 18 science high schools before 2001. Thirteen graduates who completed questionnaire were interviewed face-to-face. Their ages ranged from 28.00 to 42.84. The high achievers were belonged to top 30% and the low achievers were belonged to the bottom 30% and the two groups demonstrated significant differences in their higher education and creative productivity. More doctoral degree holders and more number of creative products were found in the high achievers than the low achievers. 58.1% of the high achievers and 42.7% of the low achievers were working as professional scientists. Significantly more high achievers were working on tasks which require creative problem solving abilities and their income was significantly higher than the low achievers. For both groups, parents were the most significant individuals and then teachers were the second most important persons who impacted to their life and the choice of their occupation. Interviews with 13 graduates confirmed the survey results especially in their choice of life style and occupation. They were also influenced the most by parents, then teachers, and their friends who were more interacting with the socioeconomic environment when they selected university, major, and occupation. The results implies that high school achievement has significant influence on their future achievement to some extent and schools need to provide guide on the career choice not only to the students but also to their parents, since students' career choices are much influenced by their parents.
Keywords
Science high school graduates; The most influential individuals on one's life and occupational choice; Academic achievement; Occupation; Average income; IQ;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius V. CA: Stanford University Press.
2 Usinger, J. (2005). Parent/guardian visualization of career and academic future of seventh graders enrolled in low-achieving schools. Career Development Quarterly, 53, 234-245.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
4 Young, R. A., & Friesen, J. D. (1992). The intention of parents in influencing the career development of their children. Career Development Quarterly, 40, 198-207.   DOI
5 Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a Meta-theoretical perspective. In K. Heller, F. Monks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent. London: Pergamon.
6 Young, R. A. (1993, April). Parent-adolescent conversations about career development and educational plans. In R. Marques (Chair), International research on school and family connections. Symposium conducted at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
7 Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.
8 Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343-357). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9 Subotnik, R. F., Karp, D. E., & Morgan, E. R. (1989). High IQ children at mid-life: An investigation into the generalizability of Terman's "Genetic studies of genius." Roeper Review, 11(3), 139-144.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Subotnik, R. F., Kassan, L., Summers, E., & Wasser, A. (1993). Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11 Subotnik, R. F., & Steiner, C. L. (1994). Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in science: A longitudinal study of 1983 Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners. In R. F. Subotnik, & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 52-76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
12 Perleth, C., & Heller, K. A. (1994). The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness. In R. F. Subotnik, & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 77-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
13 Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C., & Lapan, R. T. (2004). Family factors associated with sixth-grade adolescents' math and science career interests. Career Development Quarterly, 53, 41-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Miller, J. (2010). Parents still major influence on child's decision to pursue science careers. Science Daily, Retrieved February 26, 2011, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100220204814.htm
15 Mau, W. (2003). Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations. Career Development Quarterly, 51, 234-243.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. NY: Dodd, Mead.
17 Schoon, I. (2000). A life span approach to talent development. In K. Heller, F. Monks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent. London: Pergamon Press.
18 Hany, E. A. (1994). The development of basic cognitive components of technical creativity: A longitudinal comparison of children and youth with high and average intelligence. In R. F. Subotnik, & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 77-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
19 Gagne, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60-74). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
20 Hargrove, B. K., Creagh, M. G., & Burgess, B. L. O. (2002). Family interaction patterns as predictors of vocational identity and career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 185-201.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. New York: World Book.
22 Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers-The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23 Hartung, P. J., Porfeli, F. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 385-419.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Cho, S., & Campbell, J. (2011). Differential influences of family processes for scientifically talented individuals' academic achievement along development stages. Roeper Review, 33(1), 33-45.
25 Cho, S., & Lin, C. Y. (2011). Influence of family processes, motivation, and beliefs about intelligence on creative problem solving of scientifically talented individuals. Roeper Review, 33(1), 46-58.
26 Cho, S., Ahn, D., Han, S., & Park, H. (2008). Academic developmental pattern of the Korean gifted during the 18 years after identification. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 784-789.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
28 Arnold, K. A. (1994). The Illinois valedictorian project: Early adult careers of academically talented male high school students. In R. F. Subotnik, & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 77-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
29 Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. NY: Ballatine Books.