Browse > Article

Legal Imperatives Related to Teacher Certification in Gifted Education  

Park, Chang-Un (Pusan National University)
Seo, Hae-Ae (Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.20, no.1, 2010 , pp. 231-256 More about this Journal
Abstract
The research attempts to explore legal issues related to teacher certification in gifted education. For this end, first, the institutional processes of the 'Law of the Promotion of Education for the Gifted and Talented' and its legal characteristics were reviewed. The 'Law of the Promotion of Education for the Gifted and Talented' appeared to be superior to the 'Law of Elementary and Secondary School Education' in order to ensure the right of the gifted to receive a proper education. In consequences, regulations related to teacher certification in gifted education should require to obtain professional knowledge and ability in addition to general education teacher certification. Second, the differences between 'Law of the Promotion of Education for the Gifted and Talented' and 'Law of Elementary and Secondary School Education' were analyzed. It was found that the 'Law of the Promotion of Education for the Gifted and Talented' is not sufficiently articulated in terms of required and elective courses and hours to certify teachers for the gifted as well as their employment at gifted educational institutions. In conclusions, further attentions to legal imperatives in gifted education are called for establishing and upgrading teacher certification in gifted education.
Keywords
Law of the Promotion of Education for the gifted and Talented; Teachers for the gifted; Legal regulation for teacher certification in gifted education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 윤정일 (1991). 교육법의 기본원리와 구조에 관한 법철학적 분석연구. 서울: 서울대학교 사범대학.
2 이돈희 (1999). 교육정의론. 서울: 교육과학사.
3 서혜애 (2008). 영재교육 교사 전문성의 효율적 실천을 위한 행 ․ 재정 지원의 요구분석. 영재교육연구, 18(2), 175-200.   과학기술학회마을
4 서혜애, 박경희 (2007). 영재교육 교사연수의 교사 전문성 신장에 대한 구조방정식 모형. 영재교육연구, 17(3), 421-442.
5 안기성 (1994). 교육법학연구. 서울: 고려대학교출판부.
6 류지영 (2005). 미국 영재교원 양성체제가 한국 영재교육 양성체제에 주는 시사. 한국교원교육연구, 22(1), 69-88.
7 법제처 홈페이지. http://www.law.go.kr. (2010.2.28. 검색)
8 박창언, 서혜애 (2008). 영재에 대한 의무교육 제도의 교육법적 검토. 영재교육연구, 18(3), 543-568.   과학기술학회마을
9 박창언, 최호성, 서혜애 (2009). 영재교육진흥법에 대한 교육법적 쟁점. 영재교육연구, 19(2), 211-240.   과학기술학회마을
10 박경희, 서혜애 (2007). 영재교육 교사 전문성의 구성요소 탐색 연구. 영재교육연구, 17(1), 77-98.   과학기술학회마을
11 Croft, L. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. In N. Colangelo and G. A. Davis (Eds.). Handbook of gifted education. (pp.558-571) Boston, MA: Pearson.
12 김낙운 (1986). 현행교육법해설. 서울: 하서출판사.
13 김홍원, 조석희, 이윤식, 박주상 (2000). 영재교육 담당교원 양성 및 임용방안 연구. 수탁연구 CR2000-16. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
14 Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen System Corporation.
15 VanTassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. (2007). Teacher education standards for the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(2), 182-205.
16 Zirkel, P. (2004). The case law on gifted education: A new look. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(4), 309-314.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Davison, J. (1996). Meeting state mandates for gifted and talented: Iowa teacher preparation programs. Roeper Review, 19(1), 41-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Karnes, F. A., & Stephens, K. R. (2008). Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented. Old Tappan, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
19 한경주 (1983). 교육법강의. 서울: 법문사.