Browse > Article

The Relationship between the Creativity and Motivation of Scientifically Gifted Students  

Hur, Chin-Hyu (Chonbuk National University)
Yee, Young-Hwan (Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.18, no.2, 2008 , pp. 343-363 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship creativity and motivation. The subjects were 297 gifted students, selected in the examination for entrance to the Science Education Institute for the Gifted located Jeonbuk. To compare the gifted students' creativity and motivation with the normal students', this study used the standardized test, the Creativity Inventory for Students(by Choi & Lee, 2004) and Multi-Dimensional Learning Strategy Test(by Park, 2006). The major results of this study were as follows; First, The gifted students group was high group in the creativity, and especially the gifted girls were significantly higher than the gifted boys. Second, learning motivation of the gifted students were high or than the normal students and the gifted students were inclined to cope actively to challenge situation rather than avoid. Third, The Creativity showed the positive relationship with learning motivation, the negative relationship with avoid motivation, and moderate relationship with competitive motivation. This result suggested that it is very important to encourage gifted students to the intrinsic motivation rather than extrinsic motivation like competition or achievement in education.
Keywords
Creativity; Learning motivation; Extrinsic motivation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 박병기, 강현숙, 이영신 (2006), 창의성과 학습동기와의 관계. 교육심리연구. 20(3) 651-678
2 조석희, 장영숙, 정태희, 엄희준 (2001). 간편 창의적 문제해결력 검사 개발 연구(1). 연구보고서 CR 2001-33. 한국교육개발원
3 조석희, 한석실, 안도희 (2005). 초등학교 고학년의 창의적 문제해결력에 영향을 미치는 정의적 특성에 대한 경로분석. 교육심리연구. 19(3). 745-760
4 최인수 (1998). 창의성을 이해하기 위한 여섯 가지 질문, 韓國心理學會誌: 一般 17(1). 25-47
5 하대현 (2002). T. Amabile의 창의성 이론에 근거한 동기와 창의성 및 성취동기와의 관계. 영린유아교육연구. 10(1). 87-106
6 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). 플로우: 미치도록 행복한 나를 만난다(최인수 역). 서울: 한울림(원서출판 1990)
7 Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, ere creativity and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49. 607-627   DOI
8 Terrance , E. P. (1987). The blazing drive: The creative personality. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited
9 신지은 (2002). 과학영재와 일반학생의 창의성 비교연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문
10 Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer Verlag
11 Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: anatomy of creativity seen through le lives of Freud, Binstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Bliot, Graham and Gandhi. NY. BasicBooks
12 Gagne, F. (2003). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davia(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.). pp 60-74. Bostan: Pearson Education, Inc
13 Dweck, C. S. (1988). Motivational process affecting leaming. American Psychologist, 41(10). 1040-1048   DOI
14 Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The threering conception of giftedness:A developmental mo del for creative productivity. In R. J. Stemberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press
15 Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Succesful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. NY: Simon & Schuster
16 박동혁 (2006). MLST학습전략검사(Multi-dimensional Leaning Strategy Test). 한국가이던스
17 양태현 (2003). 과학영재집단과 일반집단의 인지적, 정의적 특성 비교 연구. 인천대학교 교육대학원 석사하위 논문
18 Day, E. A., Radosevich , D. J, Chasteen, C. S. (2003). Construct and Criterion-relate d validity of 4 commonly used goal orientation instrument. Contemporary Bducational Psychology, 434-464
19 최인수, 이종구 (2004). 창의성 검사(Creativity Inventory of students), 한국가이던스
20 Davis, G. A., & Rimtn, S, B. (2004). Bducation of the gifted and talented. Allyn & Bacon
21 Barron, F., & Harrington, D M. (1981). Creativily, Inte lligence, and Personalily. Annual Review of Psychology. 32. 349-376
22 Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The role of environment in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp.11-38). Cambridge: MA: Cambridge University Press
23 Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of ere creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (E d.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 125-148). Cambridge: M A: Cambridge University Press
24 황근순, 박병기 (2005). 지능과 창의성에 의한 영재유아와 일반 유아 비교. 아동교육. 14(2). 259-270
25 Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. I. (1991). Creating creative minds. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 608-614
26 Department of Education & Skills Qualifications & Curriculum Authority (2003). Bxcence and enjoyment. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office
27 Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
28 나동진, 김철진 (2004), 삼원지능, 사고양식, 학업성취 관계에서 과학영재와 일반학생의 구조적 차이. 교육심리연구. 18(1). 115-130
29 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass
30 Gruber , H. E. (1982). Darwin on man. (2nd Ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press
31 Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools : Tansions and dilemas. New York: Routledge
32 Hui, A. (2006). Bffect of Goal orientation and self-regulation on Creative behaviors. Dissertation of the Chinese University of Hong Kong
33 유경훈 (2006). 창의성과 성취동기 및 내.외재 동기와의 관계 연구. 아동교육. 15(3). 71-82
34 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. NY: Harper & Row
35 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins
36 Ministry of Education Taiwan. (2003). White paper on creative education: Establishing a Republic of Creativity (R. O. C.) for Taiwan. Taiwan: Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R. O. C
37 Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2003, July). Programme for Rebuilding and Improving Exiting Schools. Retrieved August 18, 2003 from Http://www.moe.gov.sglprimelprime.htm
38 박주용, 오현숙 (2005). 기질 및 성격검사에서 밝혀진 영재기관 영재의 특성이 영재 선발에 주는 시사점. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제. 11(1). 143-156
39 심재영, 김종득, 김언주. (2005). 과학영재와 일반 학생 집단 간의 창의성 비교 연구. 교육심리연구. 19(3). 563-576
40 Amabile, T. M. (1986). The personalily of creativity. Creative living. 15 (3). 12-16