Browse > Article

Scientific Creativity and Visual Artistic Creativity: The Domain-universality and Domain-specificity on Creative Accomplishment  

Kang, Jung-Ha (SungKyunKwan University)
Choe, In-Soo (SungKyunKwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.18, no.2, 2008 , pp. 201-237 More about this Journal
Abstract
The object of this research is to understand the domain-universality and domain-specificity of scientific domain and visual art domain from case studies on individuals who had made creative accomplishments in the domain of science and visual art. For case studies, 10 people who made creative accomplishments in the science and technology domain and 9 people who made creative accomplishments in the visual art domain were selected as the research participants. The conclusions for the case studies were made on the data obtained from interviewing the research participants using KES as an analytical frame. The findings of this study support as follows. Creativity on scientific domain and visual art domain is both the domain-universality and domain-Specificity. The domain-universality Of scientific domain and visual art domain is related to the nature of human beings, originality in creativity, and the natural selection. On the other hand, The domain-specificity of scientific domain and visual art domain is related to the type of knowledge and the context of applying the knowledge, will, thinking skill, direction, and social components.
Keywords
creativity; science; visual art; knowledge; domain-universality; domain-specificity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강정하 (2007). 과학적 창의성과 예술적 창의성: 지식의 성장으로서의 창의성에 대한 사례연구 및 과학적 창의성의 타당화. 성균관대학교 박사학위논문
2 최인수 (1998). 창의적 성취와 관련된 제 요인들: 창의성연구의 최근 모델인 체계모델(Systems Model)을 중심으로. 미래유아교육학회, 15(2). 133-166
3 Amheim, R. (1969). Vissal thinking. London, England: The Regents of the University of California
4 Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to mea me? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds(Eds.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 3-32). New Yon.:Plenum Press
5 Choe, In-soo (2006). Creativity: A sidden rising star in Kore a. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Stemberg(Eds.), International handbook of creativity(pp. 395-420). Cambridge University Press
6 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: Harper Collins
7 Feist, G. J. (1999). 14. The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Stemberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 273-296). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
8 Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process. University of California Press
9 Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity(2nd). Chicago: University of Chic ago Press
10 Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Stemb erg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 93-115). Cambridge: University Press
11 Poincare, H. (1952). Science and hypothesis. Mineola, NY.: Dover Publications, Inc.. (Original work published 1905)
12 Simonton, D. K. (1987). Developmental ante cedents of achieved eminence. Amals of Child Developmemt, 5, 131-169
13 Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking(2nd). New York: Harper & Brothers Publshers
14 The World book Bncyclopedia (1992). Vol 15. Chicago: World book, Inc
15 Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1989). Bxploring complexity. New York, NY: Freeman and Company
16 Darwin, C. R. (2006). 인간의 유래. [김관선 역]. 경기도 파주: 한길사. (원본출간연도:1871)
17 Golovin, N. E. (1963). The creative person in science. In C. W. Taylor, & F. Barron (Eds.), Sciantific creativity: Its recognition and developmemt(pp. 7-23). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
18 Kaufman, J. C., & Baer , J. (2004). Ch 1. Hawking's haiku, Madonna's math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room of the house , In R. J. Stemberg, E. L. Grigorenko , & J. L. Singer(Eds.), Creativity: From potential; to realization(pp. 127 -152). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association
19 Shlain, L. (1991). Arts and physics. New York, NY: HarperCollins
20 Wallas, G. (1926). The art thought. New York: Harcourt Brace
21 Whitehead, A. N. (1996). 관념의 모험. (오영환 역). 파주: 한길사. (원전은 1932년 출판)
22 Hadamard, J. (1945). The mathematician's mind. Princeton University Press
23 Popper, K. (2006). 삶은 문제해결의 연속이다. [허형은 역]. 서울: 부글북스. (원본출간연도: 1994)
24 Tannenbaum , A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Co langelo & G. A. Davis(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education 3rd (pp. 45-59). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
25 Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the stndy of human creativity. In R. J. Stemberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 35-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
26 Gardner, H. (1997). Six afterthoughts: Comments on "Varieties of intellectual talent". Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(2). 120-130   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Reed, H. (1991). 예술이란 무엇인가. [윤일주 역]. 서울: 을유문화사
28 Baer , J. (1993/1994 , December/Jarwary). Why you shouldn't trust creativity tests. Bducational Leodership, 51. 80-83
29 Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6). 380-400   DOI
30 Miller, A. I. (2001). Binstein, Picasso. New York, NY: Basic Books
31 Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: The Berkley Publishing Group
32 Amheim, R. (1971). Bntropy and art.: An assay say on disorder and order. University of California Press
33 Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robin son, R. E. (1990). The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. LA, CA: The J. Paul Getty Museum
34 Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1995). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winton
35 Plucker, J. A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis, Journal of Creative Behavior, 38. 1-12   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Torrance , E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tets of Creative Thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4). 236-252   DOI
37 Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going?: Taking sock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15 (2 & 3). 107-120   DOI   ScienceOn
38 한기순(2005). 창의성 영역문제의 탐색 및 재접근, 영재교육연구. 15(2). 1-34   과학기술학회마을
39 Bhaskar, R. (2007). 비관적 실재론과 해방의 사회과학. 서울: 후마니타스 (원본출간 연도:1988)
40 Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company
41 Prigogine, I. (1997) 확실성의 종말. [이덕환 역]. 서울:사이언스북스
42 Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Stemberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 213-225). Cambridge: University Press
43 Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31. 121-125   DOI
44 Inghilleri , P. (1999). From Subjective Bxperience to Cultural Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
45 Darwin, C. R. (1995). 종의 기원. [이민재 역]. 서울: 을유문화사. (원본출간연도:1959 (Mentor Ed., Original work published 1859))
46 Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of hum an intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill