Browse > Article

The comparison of domain in creativity among performance groups  

Lee, Jeong-Kyu (상균관대학교 영재교육원)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.13, no.4, 2003 , pp. 119-140 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the dispute over creativity domain at schools in Korea. In other words, this study is to examine the creativity domain among all subjects, a group of high level performance, and a group of low level performance in creativity. Based on ability-differentiation hypothesis, correlation among 4 domains, correlation between divergent thinking variables of domain-generality and 4 domains of domain-speciality, and multiple linear regression have been computed. The results are opposed to the hypothesis. The group of low level performance is related to domain-speciality. The group of high level performance, however, has relationships neither domain-generality nor domain-speciality. Instead of differentiation between domain-generality and domain-speciality, the results support the domain-complementarity.
Keywords
domain-generality; domain-speciality; domain-complementarity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김혜숙, 최인수(2002). 창의성구조모형의 검증, 교육심리연구, 16(4), 229-245
2 문용림 역저(2001). 다중지능 인간지능의 새로운 이해. 서울: 김영사
3 이정규(2003). 창의성 연구에 있어서 영역성과 측정에 대한 문제점 분석 연구. 교육심리연구, 17(4). 315-335
4 한기순(2000). 창의성의 영역한정성과 영역보편성에 관한 분석과 탐구. 영재교육연구, 10(2), 47-69
5 황정규(1995). 인간의 지능(2nd). 서울: 민음사
6 Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. A Componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376   DOI
7 Baer, J. (1999). Domains of Creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R.(Eds.). Encyclopedia of Creativity(pp. 591-596). Academic Press
8 Diakidoy, I. N.. & Spanoudis, G. (2002). Domain Specificity in Creativity Testing: A Comparison of Performance on general divergent-thinking test and personalities, content specific test. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36(1), 41-61   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Gardner, H. (1995). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 202-209
10 Garret, H. E. (1946). A developmental tehory of intelligence. American Psychologist, 1. 372-378   DOI
11 Kogan, N. (1994). Diverging from divergent thinking. Contemporary Psychology, 39(3). 291-292   DOI
12 Runco. M. A. & Plucker, J. A. & Lim, W. (2000-2001), Development and Psychometric integrity of a measure of Ideational Behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3 & 4). 393-400
13 Sternberg, R. J. & Rubart, T. I.(1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of corformity. NY: Free Press
14 Sternberg, R. J. & Rubart, T. I.(1996). Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, July
15 Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399   DOI
16 Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
17 Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Teaching and testing for creativity. In the international Encyclopedia of Educationi(2nd ed., pp. 1178-1183). NY: Pergamon Press
18 Han, K. S & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple Creativities? Investigating Domain- Specificity of Creativity in Young Children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2). 98-109   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297-312). Cambridge University Press
20 하대현(2002). T. Amabile의 창의성 이론에 근거한 동기와 창의성간의 관계 연구. 교육학연구, 40(2), 111-142
21 Brown, R. T.(1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover. R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds(Eds.), Handbook of creativity(pp3-36), NY: Plenum Press
22 Eisenberger, R. & Cameron, J. (1998). Reward, Intrinsic motivation, and Creativity: New Findings. American Psychologist, 53(6). 673-682   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologists, 51(11), 1153-1166   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Plucker, J. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 179-182   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Baer, J.(1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2). 173-177   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychology Bulletin, 53, 267-293   DOI   ScienceOn
27 한국교육개발원(2002). 인문 · 사회 영재 판별도구 개발연구(Ⅲ) -언어 영재 판별 검사 도구개발을 중심으로- 수탁연구 CR2002-44
28 Torrance, E. P. (I990a). The Torrance test of Creative Thinking : Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL. : Scholastic Testing Service, INC
29 김종완(1998). 통합적 접근에 기초한 아동의 창의성 측정도구 개발. 박사학위논문, 성균관대학교
30 Zhou, Zing & Oldham, G. R. (2001). Enhancing Creative performance: Effects of Expected Develop-mental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personalities. The journal of Creative Behavior, 35(3), 151-167   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY; Basic Books
32 조석희(1999). 창의성 증진을 위한 교수-학습에 관한 교육심리학의 역할과 과제. 교육심리연구, 13(2). 81-105
33 Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The theory in practice. NY. : Basic Books
34 최일호 · 최인수(2001). 새로운 생각은 어떻게 가능한가: 전문분야 창의성에 대한 학습 과정모델 접근. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 20(2), 409-428
35 하대현(2003). MI이론의 경험적 타당화 연구(Ⅲ) : 지능과 인지양식의 영역-특수성의 발달적 변화. 교육심리연구, 17(3), 27-52
36 Sternberg, R. J. & Rubart, T. I.(1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg(Eds.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 3-15). Cambridge University Press
37 김명숙(1998). 창의성 교육프로그램의 유형 및 관련 변인이 창의성 향상에 미치는 효과. 박사학위논문, 성균관대학교