Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2021.23.1.46

A Qualitative Study on the Perceptions and Learning Behavior of Medical Students in Online Classes  

Kang, Yeji (Department of Medical Education, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
Kim, Do-Hwan (Department of Medical Education, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Medical Education Review / v.23, no.1, 2021 , pp. 46-55 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), medical schools have experienced a sudden, full-scale transition to online classes. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, it is important to evaluate current educational programs and to assess their implications. This study explored perceptions of online classes and learning behavior among medical students. Twenty preclinical medical students were interviewed in focus groups for 2 months. They generally expressed positive perceptions about online classes, and in particular, positively assessed the ability to lead their individual lifestyles and study in comfortable environments with fewer time and space constraints. Students thought that the online environment provided a fair chance of facilitating positive interactions with the professor and considered communication with the professor to be an important factor only when it was related to the class content or directly helped with their grades and careers. Students also had negative views, such as feeling uncertain when they could not see their peers' learning progress and assess themselves in comparison and feeling social isolation. Learning behaviors have also changed, as students explored their learning styles and adapted to the changed learning environment. Students expanded their learning by using online functions. However, students sometimes abused the online class format by "just playing" the lecture while not paying attention and relying on other students' lecture transcripts to study. The results of this study are hoped to provide a useful foundation for future research on online class-based teaching and learning.
Keywords
Attitude; Curriculum; Medical education; Medical student; Perception;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
2 Parscal T, Riemer D. Assuring quality in large-scale online course development. Online J Distance Learn Adm. 2010;13(2).
3 Shachar M, Neumann Y. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: a meta-analytic approach. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2003;4(2):1-20.
4 Johnson MT. Impact of online learning modules on medical student microbiology examination scores. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2008;9(1):25-9.   DOI
5 Lee A. Edutech teaching method for non-face-to-face medical education: focusing on flipped learning. Korean Med Educ Rev. 2020;22(3):217-9.   DOI
6 Davies RS, Dean DL, Ball N. Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2013;61(4):563-80.   DOI
7 O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education: an integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):130.   DOI
8 Han H, Nelson E, Wetter N. Medical students' online learning technology needs. Clin Teach. 2014;11(1):15-9.   DOI
9 Pei L, Wu H. Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019;24(1):1666538.   DOI
10 Gordon M, Patricio M, Horne L, Muston A, Alston SR, Pammi M, et al. Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 63. Med Teach. 2020;42(11):1202-15.   DOI
11 Flick U. Triangulation in qualitative research. In: Flick U, von Kardorff E, Steinke I, editors. A companion to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage publications; 2004. p. 178-83.
12 Srinivasan DK. Medical students' perceptions and an anatomy teacher's personal experience using an e-learning platform for tutorials during the COVID-19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):318-9.   DOI
13 Mukhtar K, Javed K, Arooj M, Sethi A. Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S27-S31.
14 Heeter C. Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ. 1992;1(2):262-71.   DOI
15 Tongco MD. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2007;5:147-58.   DOI
16 Ragin CC. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies, with a new introduction. Oakland (CA): University of California Press; 2014.
17 Stake RE. The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1995.
18 Patton MQ. Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: a personal, experiential perspective. Qual Soc Work. 2002;1(3):261-83.   DOI
19 Creswell JW, Baez JC. 30 Essential skills for the qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2020.
20 Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage publications; 1997.
21 Seidman I. Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York (NY): Teachers College Press; 2006.
22 Joo YJ, Lim KY, Kim EK. Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Comput Educ. 2011;57(2): 1654-64.   DOI
23 Kessler R. The teaching presence. Holist Educ Rev. 1991;4(4):4-15.
24 Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am J Distance Educ. 2001;15(1):7-23.   DOI
25 Zimitat C. First year students' perceptions of the importance of good teaching: not all things are equal. Res Dev High Educ. 2006;29:386-92.
26 Derouin RE, Fritzsche BA, Salas E. E-learning in organizations. J Manag. 2005;31(6):920-40.   DOI
27 Kidd TT, Song H. A case study of the adult learner's perception of instructional quality in web-based online courses. In: Inoue Y, editor. Online education for lifelong learning. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2007. p. 271-91.
28 Corno L, Mandinach EB. The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educ Psychol. 1983;18(2):88-108.   DOI
29 Burns DD. The perfectionist's script for self-defeat. Psychol Today. 2001;14(11):34-51.
30 Saddler CD, Sacks LA. Multidimensional perfectionism and academic procrastination: relationships with depression in university students. Psychol Rep. 1993;73(3 Pt 1):863-71.   DOI
31 Kaye C, Volkers E. Constructivism online: Vygotskian applications for 21st century learning in higher education. In: Inoue Y, editor. Online education for lifelong learning. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2007. p. 99-121.
32 Sandars J, Cleary TJ. Self-regulation theory: applications to medical education: AMEE guide no. 58. Med Teach. 2011;33(11):875-86.   DOI
33 Kebaetse MB, Kebaetse M, Mokone GG, Nkomazana O, Mogodi M, Wright J, et al. Learning support interventions for Year 1 medical students: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2018;52(3):263-73.   DOI
34 Karnieli-Miller O, Vu TR, Frankel RM, Holtman MC, Clyman SG, Hui SL, et al. Which experiences in the hidden curriculum teach students about professionalism? Acad Med. 2011;86(3):369-77.   DOI