Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2015.17.3.97

Architectural Design Approach of New Medical Education Building Fit for Pedagogy Changes  

Kim, Namju (Architectural Identity Designers & Associates)
Publication Information
Korean Medical Education Review / v.17, no.3, 2015 , pp. 97-104 More about this Journal
Abstract
This literature review explores relevant research and evaluation on pedagogy and physical learning spaces. This study also is intended to encourage discussion among stakeholders on the best medical school developments, in light of emerging learning trends relevant to their institutions. The study has revealed that new environments for learning are being designed or reshaped in response to changing pedagogical approaches, to incorporate new information technology, and to accommodate the changing abilities of new generations of learners. Formal teaching spaces for large groups with a 'sage on a stage' are becoming less common than smaller lecture rooms, although classrooms form a large component of universities and will continue to dominate in the future. However, the traditional layout of these spaces is being transformed to incorporate multiple learning modes. Classrooms should be profound places of revelation and discovery. A well-designed space has the ability to elevate discourse, encourage creativity, and promote collaboration. Within the classroom walls, a learning space should be as flexible as possible, not only because different teachers and classes require different configurations, but because in order to fully engage in learning, students need to transition between lectures, group study, presentations, discussions, and individual work time.
Keywords
Teaching; Learning space; Architecture as topic;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. J Coll Stud Dev, 40(5), 518-529.
2 Banning, J. H., & Canard, M. R. (1986). High performance learning space. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1427). New York, NY: Springer.
3 Brown, M. B., & Lippincott, J. K. (2003). Learning spaces: More than meets the eye. Educause Q, 26(1), 14-17.
4 Brown, M. (2005). Learning spaces. In D. Oblinger, & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 174-195). Boulder, CO: Educause.
5 Gislason, N. (2009). Mapping school design: A qualitative study of the relations among facilities design, curriculum delivery, and school climate. J Environ Educ, 40(4), 17-34.   DOI
6 IDEO. (2015). Design kit: The field guide to human-centered design. Retrieved from https://www.ideo.com/work/human-centered-design-toolkit/#xxMjyVW6W2iAQ06d.99
7 Joint Information Systems Committee. (2005). How innovative technologies are influencing the design of physical learning spaces in the post 16 sector (Learning Spaces Final Report, pp. 66-69). Bristol: Joint Information Systems Committee.
8 Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college what evidence is there that it works? Chang: Mag High Learn, 30(4), 26-35.
9 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (1996). The role of the science system in the knowledge-based economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
10 Rosenberg, J. S. (2011, October 18). Pedagogy, practice, and teaching innovation at Harvard. Retrieved from http://harvardmagazine.com/2011/10/analysis-pedagogy-practice-and-teaching-innovation-at-harvard
11 Steelcase. (2014). Making noise in the library, Steelcase 360: Rethinking higher education space. Retrieved from http://uwmltc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/360_Issue60-1-small.pdf