Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2021.24.1.002

Pre-service Teachers' Noticing in Peer Evaluation of Mathematical Problem Posing: Focusing on permutation and combination  

Shin, Dongjo (Korea University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society / v.24, no.1, 2021 , pp. 19-38 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine pre-service teachers' noticing when evaluating peers' mathematical problem posing tasks. To this end, 46 secondary pre-service teachers were asked to create real-world problems related to permutation and combination and randomly assigned to evaluate peers' problems. As a result, the pre-service teachers were most likely to notice the difficulty of their peers' mathematics problems. In particular, the pre-service teachers tended to notice particular conditions in order to increase the difficulty of a problem. In addition, the pre-service teachers noticed the clarity of a question and its solution, novelty of the problem, the natural connection between real-world contexts and mathematical concepts, and the convergence between mathematical concepts.
Keywords
permutation and combination; peer evaluation; teacher noticing; pre-service teacher;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Meluskova, J., Sunderlik, J. (2014). Pre-service teachers' problem posing in combinatorics, In. (Eds.) Sedivy, O., Svecova, V., Vallo, D., Vidermanova, K. Acta Mathematica 17: Conference Proceedings 12th Mathematical Conference in Nitra, (pp. 115-122). Constantine the Philosopher University.
2 Mhlolo, M. K. (2017). Regular classroom teachers' recognition and support of the creative potential of mildly gifted mathematics learners. ZDM, 49(1), 81-94.   DOI
3 Mitchell, R. N., & Marin, K. A. (2015). Examining the use of a structured analysis framework to support prospective teacher noticing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 551-575   DOI
4 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
5 Omar, S. N. P., Shahrill, M., & Sajali, M. Z. (2018). The use of peer assessment to improve students' learning of geometry. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 5(2), 187-206.   DOI
6 Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 239-250.   DOI
7 Russell J., van Horne, S. V., Ward, A. S., Bettis III, E. A., & Gikonyo, J. (2017). Variability in students' evaluating processes in peer assessment with calibrated peer review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 178-190.   DOI
8 Sengul, S., & Katranci, Y. (2015). Free problem posing cases of prospective mathematics teachers: difficulties and solutions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1983-1990.   DOI
9 Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 3-12). New York, NY: Routledge.
10 Crespo, S. (2003). Learning to pose mathematical problems: Exploring changes in preservice teachers' practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 243-270.   DOI
11 Freeman,M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 289-300.   DOI
12 Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.   DOI
13 Jacobs, V. R., & Spangler, D. A. (2017). Research on core practices in K-12 mathematics teaching. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 766-792). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
14 Jeffery, D., Yankulov, K., Crerar, A., & Ritchie, K. (2016). How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(1), 127-140.   DOI
15 Kapur, J. N. (1970). Combinatorial analysis and school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(1), 111-127.   DOI
16 Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2014). Engaging prospective teachers in peer assessment as both assessors and assessees: The case of geometrical proofs. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning, 1-32. Retrieved from http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/lavy2.pdf
17 Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., & Rhodehamel, B. (2013). Students' mathematical noticing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 809-850.   DOI
18 Mallart, A., Font, V., & Diez, J. (2018). Case study on mathematics pre-service teachers' difficulties in problem posing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1465-1481.
19 Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge-Falmer.
20 이상구, 이재화. (2019). 학생중심의 대학 이산수학 강의 운영사례. 수학교육논문집, 33(1), 1-19.
21 이윤미, 이수진. (2018). 수업평가와 수업성찰에서 나타나는 예비 중등 수학교사의 주목하기(Noticing). 학교수학, 20(1), 185-207.
22 이은정, 이경화. (2016). 교사의 사전 주목하기와 수학수업에서 실제 주목하기에 대한 연구. 학교수학, 18(4), 773-791.
23 이지현, 이정연, 최영기. (2005). 순열 조합 문장제의 문제 변인과 오류 분석. 학교수학, 7(2), 123-137.
24 이진아, 이수진. (2019). 중등 수학 예비교사의 수업 과정에서 보여지는 '수학적 주목하기 (Mathematical Noticing)'. 학교수학, 21(3), 561-589.
25 신동조. (2020). 통계수업 관찰에서 나타나는 예비 중등 수학교사의 전문가적 안목(professional vision). 학교수학, 22(2), 293-312.
26 한채린, 김희정, 권오남. (2018). 학생의 통계적 변이성 이해에 대한 수학 교사의 노티싱 변화 양상 사례연구. 한국학교수학회논문집, 21(2), 183-206.   DOI
27 Amador, J. M., Males, L. M., Earnest, D., & Dietiker, L. (2017). Curricular noticing: Theory on and practice of teachers' curricular use. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 427-443). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
28 Ayalon, M., & Wilkie, K. J. (2020). Investigating peer assessment strategies for mathematics pre-service teacher learning on formative assessment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09465-1   DOI
29 Callejo, M. L., & Zapatera, A. (2017). Prospective primary teachers' noticing of students' understanding of pattern generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(4), 309-333   DOI
30 Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://corestandards.org/asserts/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
31 김서령, 박혜숙, 김완순. (2007). 조합문제에서의 인식론적 장애. 수학교육, 46(2), 193-205.
32 김선희. (2006). 학생평가 전문성을 갖춘 수학교사 양성을 위한 수학학습평가 강좌의 교육 내용과 방법에 대한 제안. 학교수학, 8(3), 301-326
33 김선희. (2013). 수학 예비교사의 가상 수업 시연의 특징 및 동료 예비교사의 평가. 수학교육, 52(4), 465-481.
34 김원경, 변지영, 문소영. (2006). 수학교사의 확률과 통계에 대한 지식과 신념. 수학교육, 45(4), 381-406.
35 김정은, 이수진, 김지수. (2015). 중등 수학교사의 과제 이해 및 변형 능력. 학교수학, 17(4), 633-652
36 김하림, 이경화. (2016). 중등 수학 예비교사의 미분계수 과제 변형. 학교수학, 18(3), 711-731
37 교육부. (1997). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부. 제1997-15호 [별책8].
38 교육부. (2015). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부. 제2015-74호 [별책8].
39 김동중, 배성철, 김원, 이다희, 최상호. (2015). 중학교 2학년 수학 교과서의 수학 과제 분석: 스토리텔링 유형을 고려하여. 수학교육논문집, 29(3), 281-300.
40 김미정, 김용구, 정인철. (2009). 고등학교 순열과 조합 단원의 불안요인 연구. 한국학교수학회논문집, 12(2), 261-279.
41 김희정, 한채린, 배미선, 권오남. (2017). 수학 교사의 주목하기와 반응적 교수의 관계: 모든 학생의 수학적 사고 계발을 지향하는 수업 상황에서. 수학교육, 56(3), 341-363.
42 박주용, 박정애. (2018). 동료평가의 현황과 전망. 인지과학, 29(2), 85-104.   DOI
43 박진형. (2019). 초등 예비교사들이 수학 과제 변형에서 겪는 어려움에 대한 사례 연구: 분수 과제를 중심으로. 수학교육학연구, 29(4), 551-575.
44 오예린, 권오남, 박주용. (2018). 증명 동료평가의 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석: 대학 정수론 수업의 사례를 중심으로. 수학교육, 57(3), 215-229.
45 유기웅, 정종원, 김영석, 김한별. (2018). 질적 연구방법의 이해. 서울:박영사.
46 Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Training International, 41, 59-78.
47 Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: from research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275.   DOI
48 Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(4), 433-449.
49 Tanner, H., & Jones, S. (1994). Using peer and self-assessment to develop modelling skills with students aged 11 to 16: A socio-constructive view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(4), 413-431.   DOI
50 Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.   DOI
51 Wager, A. A. (2014). Noticing children's participation: Insights into teacher positionality toward equitable mathematics pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(3), 312-350.   DOI
52 Walkoe, J. (2015). Exploring teacher noticing of student algebraic thinking in a video club. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 523-550.   DOI
53 Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-248.   DOI
54 Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.   DOI
55 Zevenbergen, R. (2001). Peer assessment of student constructed posters: Assessment alternatives in preservice mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(2), 95-113.   DOI