Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4014/kjmb.1401.01004

Potential for the Uptake and Removal of Arsenic [As (V) and As (III)] and the Reduction of As (V) to As (III) by Bacillus licheniformis (DAS1) under Different Stresses  

Tripti, Kumari (Laboratory of Environment and Biotechnology, Department of Botany, Patna Science College, Patna University)
Sayantan, D. (Laboratory of Environment and Biotechnology, Department of Botany, Patna Science College, Patna University)
Shardendu, Shardendu (Laboratory of Environment and Biotechnology, Department of Botany, Patna Science College, Patna University)
Singh, Durgesh Narain (School of Biotechnology, Banaras Hindu University)
Tripathi, Anil K. (School of Biotechnology, Banaras Hindu University)
Publication Information
Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters / v.42, no.3, 2014 , pp. 238-248 More about this Journal
Abstract
The metalloid arsenic (Z = 33) is considered to be a significant potential threat to human health due to its ubiquity and toxicity, even in rural regions. In this study a rural region contaminated with arsenic, located at longitude $85^{\circ}$ 32'E and latitude $25^{\circ}$ 11'N, was initially examined. Arsenic tolerant bacteria from the rhizosphere of Amaranthas viridis were found and identified as Bacillus licheniformis through 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The potential for the uptake and removal of arsenic at 3, 6 and 9 mM [As(V)], and 2, 4 and 6 mM [As(III)], and for the reduction of the above concentrations of As(V) to As(III) by the Bacillus licheniformis were then assessed. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for As(V) and As(III) was determined to be 10 and 7 mM, respectively. At 3 mM 100% As(V) was uptaken by the bacteria with the liberation of 42% As(III) into the medium, whereas at 6 mM As(V), 76% AS(V) was removed from the media and 56% was reduced to As(III). At 2 mM As(III), the bacteria consumed 100%, whereas at 6 mM, the As(III) consumption was only 40%. The role of pH was significant for the speciation, availability and toxicity of the arsenic, which was measured as the variation in growth, uptake and content of cell protein. Both As(V) and As(III) were most toxic at around a neutral pH, whereas both acidic and basic pH favored growth, but at variable levels. Contrary to many reports, the total cell protein content in the bacteria was enhanced by both As(V) and As(III) stress.
Keywords
Arsenate [As(V)]; arsenite [As(III)]; Bacillus licheniformis; reduction; toxicity; uptake;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Anderson LCD, Bruland KW. 1991. Biogeochemistry of arsenic in natural waters: importance of methylated species. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25: 420-427.   DOI
2 APHA, AWWA, WEF. 2005. In Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenburg AE (eds.), Standards methods for the examination of water and waste water. American public health association, American water works association, Water Environment Federation Joint Publication USA.
3 Azaizeh H, Salhani N, Sabeswary Z, Shardendu S, Emons H. 2006. Phytoremediation of Selenium using sub-surface flow constructed Wetlands. Int. J. Phytorem. 8: 187-198.   DOI
4 Bachate SP, Cavalca L, Andreoni V. 2009. Arsenic resistant bacteria isolated from the agricultural soil of Bangladesh and characterization of arsenic reducing strain. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107: 145-156.   DOI
5 Banerjee S, Santra SC. 2010. Studies on the role of aerobic soil bacteria in arsenic transformation and mobilization. Int. Q. J. Life. Sci. 2: 587-594.
6 Bhattacharjee H, Rosen BP. 2007. Arsenic metabolism in prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes. In Nies DHS, Simonies (ed). Mol. Microbiol. Heavy Met. 6: 371-406.   DOI
7 Bradford M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248-254.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Chowdhury R, Sen AK, Karak P, Chatterjee R, Giri AK, Chaudhuri K. 2009. Isolation and characterization of arsenic resistant bacterium from a bore well in west Bengal India. Ann. Microbiol. 59: 253-258.   DOI
9 Castaldini M, Turrini A, Sbrana C, Benedette A, Marchionni M, Mocali S, et al. 2005. Imapct of Bt corn on rhizopheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial Mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microsome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 6719.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Islam FS, Gault AG, Boothman C, Polya DA, Charnock JM, Chatterjee D, et al. 2004. Role of metal-reducingbacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments. Nature 430: 68-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Grifoni A, Bazzicalupo MC, Serio CD, Fancelli S, Fani R. 1995. Identification of Azospirillum strain by restriction fragment length polymorphism of 16S-rDNA and of the histidine operon. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 127: 85-91.   DOI
12 Harold MF, Harold LR, Abrams A. 1965. A mutant of Streptococcus faecalis defective in phosphate uptake. J. Biol. Chem. 240: 3145-3153.
13 Harvey CF, Swartz CH, Badruzzaman ABM, Keon-Blute N, Yu W, Ashraf AM, et al. 2002. Arsenic mobility and groundwater extraction in Bangladesh. Science 298: 1602-1606.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Huang A, Teplitski M, Rathinasabathi B, Ma l. 2010. Charaterization of arsenic resistant bacteria from the rhizosphere of arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata. Can. J. Microbiol. 56: 236-246.   DOI
15 Kaltreider RC, Davis AM, Lariviere JP, Halminton JW. 2001. Arsenic alters the function of glucocorticoids receptor as a transcription factor. Environ. Health Perspect. 109: 245-251.
16 Kolker A, Koeppen RP. 1998. Arsenic variation in pyrite in coal: Proceeding of the fifteenth international Pittsburg Coal Conference, 9 p.
17 Liao VH-C, Chu V-J, Su Y-C, Hsiao S-Y, Wei C-C, Liu C-W, et al. 2011. Arsenite oxidising and arsenate reducing bacteria associated with arsenic rich ground water in Taiwan. J. Contam. Hydrol. 123: 20-29.   DOI
18 Liu SX, Athar M, Lippai I, Waldren C. 2001. Induction of oxyradical by arsenic : implication for mechanism of genotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 1643-1648.   DOI
19 Tsai SL, Singh S, Chen W. 2009. Arsenic metabolism by microbes in nature and the impact on arsenic remediation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20: 659-667.   DOI
20 Shardendu S, Sayantan D, Sharma D, Irfan S. 2012. Luxary uptake and removal of phosphorus from water column by representative aquatic palnts and its implication for wet land Management. ISRN Soil Sci. 2012: 1-9.
21 Shardendu, Salhani N, Boulyga SF, Stengel E. 2003. Phytoremediation of Selenium by two halophyte species in sub-surface flow constructed wetland. Chemosphere 50: 967-973.   DOI
22 Simon M, Azam F. 1989. Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Marine Ecol. Prog. Ser. 51: 145-156.
23 Solis R. 2004. Experimental and theoretical characterization of arsenite in water: insight into the coordination environment of As-O. Inorg. Chem. 43: 2954-2959.   DOI
24 Tu S, Ma LQ. 2003. Interactive effect of pH, arsenic and phosphorus on uptake of As and P and growth of the arsenic hyperaccumulator Pteris vittate L. under hydroponics condition. Environ. Exp. Bot. 50: 243-251.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Vijayalakshmi S, Usha V, Rather RA. 2011. In vitro responses of various bacteria to cadmium chloride: growth and biochemical analysis. Asian J. Exp. Biol. 2: 12-17.
26 Wolfe-Simon F, Switzer Blum J, Kulp TR, Gorden GW, Hoeft SE, Pett-Ridge J, et al. 2011. A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus. Science 332: 1163-1166.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Xiong J, Wang W, Fan H, Cai L, Wang G. 2006. Arsenic resistance bacteria in mining wastes from shangrao coal mine of China. pp.535-540. In Lyon WG, Starrett SK, Hong J, Cambridge MA (eds.). Environment Science and Technology (I), Academic Science Press, USA.
28 Clausen CA. 2000. Isolating metal-tolerant bacteria capable of removing copper chromium and arsenic from treated wood. Waste Managem. 18: 264-268.
29 Cherian T, Narayana B. 2005. A new spetrophotometric method for determination of arsenic in environmental and biological samples. Anal. Lett. 38: 2207-2216.   DOI
30 Chakraborti D, Sengupta MK, Rahman MM, Ahamed S. 2004. Groundwater arsenic contamination and its health effects in the Ganga-Meghna-Brahmaputra plain. J. Environ. Monit. 6: 74N-83N.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Ferjani A, Mustardy L, Sulpice R, Marim K, Suzuki I, Hagemann M. et al. 2003. Glucosylglycerol a compatible solute, sustain cell division under salt stress. Plant Physiol. 131: 1628-1637.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Fitz WJ, Wenzel WL. 2002. Arsenic transformation in the soilrhizosphere-plant system: fundamentals and potential application to phytoremediation. J. Biotechnol. 99: 259-278.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Frankerberger WT Jr (ed.) 2002. Environmental chemistry of arsenic. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
34 Ghodsi H, Hoodaji M, Tahmourespour A, Gheisari MM. 2011. Investigation of bioremediation of arsenic by bacteria isolated from contaminated soil. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 5: 5889-5895.
35 Goyer RA, Clarkson TW. 2001. Toxic effects of metals. Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The basis of poison, 6th Ed. McGraw Hill.
36 Meng YL, Liu Z, Rosen BP. 2004. AsIII and SbIII uptake by GIpF and efflux by Ars B in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 18334-18341.   DOI
37 Macur RE, Wheeler JT, McDermott TR, Inskeep WP, 2001. Microbial populations associated with the reduction and enhanced mobilization of arsenic in mine tailings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35: 3676-3682.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP, Phung LT, Silver S. 2002. Microbial arsenic: from geocycle to gene and enzymes. FEMS. Microbiol. Rev. 26: 311-325.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Masscheleyn PH, Delaune RD, Jr Patrick WH. 1991. Effects of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in the contaminated soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25: 1414-1429.   DOI
40 Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP. 2002. Arsenate reductase in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Environ. Health Perspect. 110: 745-748.   DOI
41 Nagvenkar GS, Ramaiah N. 2010. Arsenite tolerance and biotransformation potential in Estuarine Bacteria. Ecotoxicology 19: 604-613.   DOI
42 Oh S, Rheem S, Sim J, Kim S. 1995. Optimising condition for the growth of lactobacillus casei YIT 9018 in trypton-yeast extract-glucose medium by using response surface methodology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61: 3809-3814.
43 Oremland RS, Stolz JF. 2003. The ecology of arsenic. Science 300: 939-943.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Prescott H. 2002. Laboratory exercise in microbiology. The McGraw-Hill.
45 Rosen BP, Liu Z. 2009.Transport pathway for arsenic and selenium: A minireview. Environ Int. 35: 512-515.   DOI
46 Rosen BP. 1999. Families of arsenic transporters. Trends. Microbiol. 7: 207-212.   DOI   ScienceOn
47 Sanders OI, Rensing C, Kuroda M, Mitra B, Rosen BP. 1997. Antimonite is accumulated by the glycerol facilitator GlpF in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179: 3365-3367.   DOI