Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7230/KOSCAS.2014.35.029

Animation Education as VCAE in the Digital Age  

Park, Yoo Shin (서울교육대학교)
Publication Information
Cartoon and Animation Studies / v., no., 2014 , pp. 29-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
Visual culture art education (VCAE) seems to be the new paradigm for art education after postmodernism. Getting beyond the traditional art education, VCAE has expanded its scope of interest to include the visual environment that surrounds our life, thus pushing the boundary of art education beyond the traditional fine arts to cover pop culture and visual art. VCAE shares the issues as well as a lot of elements of culture and art education and in fact serves as a major theoretic background for culture and art education, in that it pays attention to the sociocultural context of images and emphasizes visual literacy and constructionist learning. In this paper, I have reviewed the theoretical background and related issues of VCAE with a view to presenting a direction for animation education, which is gaining in importance coming into the Age of Digital Media. VCAE was born in the progressive cultural atmosphere from the 1970s and thereafter, and its gist consists in figuring out visual artifacts and their action in order to improve individual and social life. Yet, VCAE continues with its development according to the changing aspects of visual culture, and currently, it is expanding its scope of interest to cover the esthetic, experiential education in visual culture and construction of meaning through digital story-telling. In the visual environment of the Digital Age, animation is establishing itself as the center of the visual culture, being a form that goes beyond an art genre or technology to realize images throughout the visual culture. Also, VCAE, which has so far emphasized visual communication and critical reading of culture, would need to reflect the new aspects of the visual culture in digital animation across the entire gamut from experiencing to understanding and appreciating art education. In this paper, I emphasize on Cross-Curricula, social reconstruction, the expansion of animation education, interests in animation as a digital media, and animation literacy. A study of animation education from the perspective of VCAE will not only provide a theoretical basis for establishing animation education, but also enrich the content of VCAE, traditionally focused on critical text reading, and promote its contemporary and futuristic orientation.
Keywords
VCAE; education in visual culture; visual literacy; animation education; digital media education; animation literacy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, 1-16.
2 Carol Lauritzen, Michael Jaeger 강현석 외 역, "내러티브 교육과정의 이론과 실제", 학이당, 2007.
3 QSCC(2002).Cross-curricular priorities: Lliteracy, numeracy, lifeskills, futures perspective.
4 DUNCUM, Paul (2001). Clarifying visual culture art education. Art Education, 2002, 6-11.
5 Jagodzinski, J. (2010). Visual art and education in an era of designer capitalism: Deconstructing the oral eye. Palgrave Macmillan.
6 Hellenic Pedagogical Institute (2003). A cross-thematic curriculum framework for compulsory education.
7 Finnish National Board of Education (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004
8 Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture: Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. New York: Teachers College Press.
9 Silvers, Anita (2004). "Pedagogy and Polemics: Are Art Educators Qualified to Teach Visual Culture?." Arts Education Policy Review 106.1 : 19-24.   DOI
10 QCA (1999a). The national curriculum: Handbook for primary teachers in England: Key stage 1and 2. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
11 Ministry of Education (2002). The Ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12: Interdisciplinary studies. Hellenic Pedagogical Institute(2003).
12 Smith, R. A. (2005). Efland on the aesthetic and visual culture: A response. Studies in Art Education, 284-288.
13 Tavin, K. M., & Anderson, D. (2003). Teaching (popular) visual culture: Deconstructing Disney in the elementary art classroom. Art Education, 21-35.
14 Duncum, P. (2012). An eye does not make an I: Expanding the sensorium. Studies in Art Education, 53(3), 182.
15 VCAA (2005). Victorian essential learning standards: Overview. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
16 노르베르츠 볼츠, 윤종석 역, "콘트롤된 카오스", 문예출판사, 2000.
17 김정선, 프리드먼의 시각문화교육론 연구, "미술교육연구논총", vol. 20(2006), pp. 39-65.
18 김정선, 논단: "미술교육" 에서 "시각문화교육" 으로-사회, 문화적 관점에서의 "시각문화교육". 교육비평, 2006, 20.단일호: 120-142.
19 김재웅 외, "문화예술교육 교육표준개발연구-만화.애니메이션", 한국문화예술교육진흥원, 2011.
20 노먼 브라이슨, 확장된 장에서의 응시, 핼 포스터 엮음, 최연희 역, "시각과 시각성", 경성대학교 출판부, 2012.
21 데이비드 버킹엄, 기선정, 길아미 역, "미디어교육", inbook, p161.
22 레프 마노비치, 서정신 역, "뉴미디어의 언어", 생각의 나무, 2004.
23 박유신, "애니메이션 창작 교육에서 내러티브의 교육적 가치" , 중앙대학교 첨단영상대학원 박사학위 논문, 2012.
24 박유신, 김재웅, "시각문화교육에서 추상 애니메이션이 가지는 교육적 가능성", 미술교육논총 제22권, 제3호, pp.131-156, 2008.
25 마샬 맥루한, 임상원 역, "구텐베르크 은하계", 커뮤니케이션 북스, 2003.
26 손지현, 브랜트 윌슨의 미술교육 사상과 시각문화연구, "미술교육논총" 제 20권 3호, pp 6-7.
27 안인기. 시각적 문해력 이후의 시각문화교육. 미술과 교육, 2014, 15.1: 55-74
28 애플랜드, 박정애 역, "인지중심 미술교육론", 1995, 교육과학사.
29 애플랜드, 박정애 역. 20 세기 미술교육에서의 진보의 비전, "미술과 교육" 2 (2001): 65-92
30 앤더슨&밀브란트, 김정희 외 역, "삶을 위한 미술교육", 예경, 2007, p73
31 워커, 채플린 "시각문화", 2004, 루비박스,
32 이상은; 소경희. 각국의 교육과정 문서에 제시된 범교과적 교육과정 (Cross-Curricula) 접근 방식 분석: 영국, 호주, 캐나다, 한국을 중심으로. 교육과정연구, 2008, 26.1: 59-79.
33 이지연 새로운 미술교육의 패러다임으로서의 시각문화교육의 가능성과 적용 연구, "미술과 교육" 12, (2)(2011): 61-78
34 폴 던컴, 이재영 역, 시각문화에 관한, 시각문화 안에서, 시각문화를 통한 비평적 사고. "미술과 교육", 2005, 6.1: 37-50.
35 Efland, A. D. (2005). Problems Confronting Visual Culture. Art Education, 58(6), 35-40.
36 박정애, "의미 만들기의 예술", 시공아트, 2009,
37 Lanier, V. (1969). The Teaching of Art as Social Revolution. Phi Delta Kappan.
38 아더 애프랜드, 박정애 역, "미술교육의 역사", 예경, 1996.
39 Education Queensland (2000). New basics project technical paper. Brisbane: Author.