1 |
Pioggia, G., Igliozzi, R., Ferro, M., Ahluwalia, A., Muratori, F., & De Rossi, D. (2005). An android for enhancing social skills and emotion recognition in people with autism. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 13(4), 507-515.
DOI
|
2 |
Graham-Rowe, D. (2002). My best friend's a robot. New scientist(2369), 30-33.
|
3 |
Dautenhahn, K. (2003). Roles and functions of robots in human society: implications from research in autism therapy. Robotica, 21(04), 443-452.
DOI
|
4 |
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., & Dubowski, J. (2006). Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot?. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 509-542.
DOI
|
5 |
Cook, A. M., Adams, K., Encarnacao, P., & Alvarez, L. (2012). The role of assisted manipulation in cognitive development. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 15(2), 136-148.
DOI
|
6 |
Kimbler, D. (1984). Robots and special education: The robot as extension of self 1. Peabody Journal of Education, 62(1), 67-76.
DOI
|
7 |
Howell, R., & Hay, K. (1989). Software-based access and control of robotic manipulators for severely physically disabled students. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1(1), 53-72.
|
8 |
Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R., & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 105-120.
DOI
|
9 |
Gelderblom, G. J., Dijkstra, J., & Kronreif, G. (2007). User involvement in IROMEC: Robot development for children with disabilities. Proc. AAATE07, 515-519.
|
10 |
Martens, C., Ruchel, N., Lang, O., Ivlev, O., & Graser, A. (2001). A friend for assisting handicapped people. Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, 8(1), 57-65.
DOI
|
11 |
Michaud, F., Larouche, H., Larose, F., Salter, T., Duquette, A., Mercier, H., & Lauria, M. (2007). Mobile robots engaging children in learning. Paper presented at the Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Conference, Toronto.
|
12 |
Alimisis, D. (2009). Teacher Education on Robotics-Enhanced Constructivist Pedagogical Methods. School of Pedagogical and Technological Education, Αthens.
|
13 |
Mohan, R. E., Calderon, C. A. A., Zhou, C., & Yue, P. K. (2008). Evaluating virtual emotional expression systems for human robot interaction in rehabilitation domain. Paper presented at the Cyberworlds, 2008 International Conference on.
|
14 |
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
DOI
|
15 |
박광렬(2011). 초등학교 로봇 교육 및 교구의 현황과 발전 방향의 고찰. 한국실과교육학회지, 24(3), 323-343.
|
16 |
김태준(2017). 로봇활용교육을 위한 특수교사의 수용의도에 관한 구조 분석: 기술수용모형을 바탕으로. 미출판 박사학위논문, 전남대학교 대학원 특수교육과.
|
17 |
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for information systems, 12(1), 50.
|
18 |
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
DOI
|
19 |
Jackson, C. M., Chow, S., & Leitch, R. A. (1997). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision sciences, 28(2), 357-389.
DOI
|
20 |
Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management, 38(4), 217-230.
DOI
|
21 |
Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.
DOI
|
22 |
Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C.-S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245-268.
DOI
|
23 |
McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction: Online versus traditional course delivery. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(2), 25.
|
24 |
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS quarterly, 561-570.
|
25 |
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS quarterly, 665-694.
|
26 |
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
|
27 |
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision sciences, 28(3), 557-582.
DOI
|
28 |
Rogers Everett, M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York.
|
29 |
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test*. Decision sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
DOI
|
30 |
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.
DOI
|
31 |
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
|
32 |
Bajaj, A., & Nidumolu, S. R. (1998). A feedback model to understand information system usage. Information & management, 33(4), 213-224.
DOI
|