Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2020.23.4.52

Analysis of TRIZ and SIT Thinking Tool Utilization of Valuable Patents: Focused on the Patent Infringement Lawsuit Filed by Nokia  

Im, Yoywang (Management of Technology, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of Engineering Education Research / v.23, no.4, 2020 , pp. 52-65 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to find the major creative ideation patterns embedded in the commercially valuable patents in the mobile communication industry. For the purpose, we analyze 171 cases of the patent infringement lawsuit filed by Nokia in the United States. It is examined that what kind of TRIZ inventive principles and SIT thinking tools were applied to resolve technical contractions in each of the 171 cases respectively. Among the 40 inventive principles of TRIZ, 'feedback' principle was used mostly and 'division' principle the next. Among the 5 thinking tools of SIT, 'attribute dependency' mostly used, and 'division' the next. This suggests that what kind of inventive principles or thinking tools should be considered preferentially to resolve technical contradictions in practically important technical problems in the mobile communication industry.
Keywords
Patent infringement; Creative ideation; TRIZ; SIT; Mobile communication industry;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 박영택.김성대(1998). 신제품개발에 있어서 창조성기법의 활용에 관한 연구. 품질경영학회지, 26(4), 202-218.
2 박수진.김태훈.왕유진(2011). 국내 트리즈 연구 동향 분석. 실과교육연구, 17(2), 215-236.   DOI
3 송명원.박영택(2018). 가치가 높은 특허 창출을 위한 TRIZ 활용방안 연구. 공학교육연구, 21(6), 81-89.
4 신경섭(2012). 미국특허침해소송론. 서울: 시그마프레스.
5 유경동(2018). 유경동의 특허토커. 조선IT. Retrieved from http://it.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2018/04/12/2018041285030.html/.
6 이봉우(2014). 과학(영재) 교육에서 발명, 특허교육 활성화 방안 연구. 특허청.
7 이태용.여형석(2018). SIT와 BCC 활용의 장점과 도전과제: 반도체 제조혁신을 중심으로. 한국경영공학회지 23(3), 1-20.
8 이해영(2012). 미국특허법. 서울: 한빛지적소유권센터.
9 허건 외(2016). 창의적인 식품 개발에 있어서 SIT의 효과성에 관한 연구: H사의 신제품을 중심으로. 품질경영학회지, 44(1), 95-108.   DOI
10 호경업.이신영(2012). 14년간 휴대폰 시장 평정했던 노키아 몰락의 비밀. Retrieved from http://weeklybiz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/05/18/2012051801265.html.
11 Allison, J.R. et al.(2003). Valuable patents. Georgetown Law Journal, 92, 435-480.
12 Altshuller, G.(1984). Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of Solution of Inventive Problems. Australia: Gordon and Breach.
13 Brown, T.(2008). 고객의 마음으로 생각하라. (김현정, 역). 동아비즈니스리뷰 11, 33-40 (원본 출판년도 2008).
14 Cooper, R. G.(1993). Winning at New Product: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
15 Cooper, R. G.(2000). Doing it right. Ivey Business Journal 64(6), 54-60.
16 Cooper, R. G.(2006). Formula for success in new product development. Marketing Management, 15(2), 18-24.
17 Finke, R. A.(1990). Creative Imagery: Discoveries and Inventions in Visualization. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18 Goldenberg, J. & Mazursky, D.(2002). Creativity in product innovation. Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press.
19 Hamel, G.(2001). 꿀벌과 게릴라 (이동현, 역). 서울:세종서적. (원본 출판년도 2000).
20 Harhoff, D. et al.(1999). Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511-515.   DOI
21 Horowitz, R.(2001). From TRIZ to ASIT in 4 Steps. The TRIZ journal. Retrieved from http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2001/08/c/index.htm.
22 Karki, M. M. S.(1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272.   DOI
23 Konnath, H.(2020). IBM, Samsung Again Top Annual Patent Gains List. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1274547/ibm-samsung-again-top-annual-patent-gains-list
24 Lawtellidence(2019). 미국소송은 대체 왜 이렇게 비용이 많이 들까?. Retrieved from https://brunch.co.kr/@attorneysung/2.
25 Dernis, H. & Khan, M.(2004). Triadic Patent Families Methodology. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. DOI: 10.1787/443844125004.
26 Rantanen, K. & Domb E.(2005). 알기쉬운 트리즈. (김병재.박성균, 역). 서울: 인터비전. (원본 출판년도 2002).
27 Ryan D.(2020). Virus Curbs More Hearings, Trials In Fed. Circ. And WDTX. Retrieved from https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1272293/virus-curbs-more-hearings-trials-in-fed-circ-and-wdtx.
28 Selna V. J.(2017). Case 8:14-cv-00341-JVS-DFM Document 1802. Retrieved from https://www.essentialpatentblog.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2017/12/2017.12.22.-1803-Final-Judgment-And-Injunction.pdf.
29 Schilling, Melissa(2017). 기술경영과 혁신전략. (김길선, 역). 서울: 한국맥그로힐. (원본 출판년도 2017).
30 USPTO(2018). Manual of Patent Examining Procedure Latest Revision January 2018 [R-08.2017]. Retrieved from https://mpep.uspto.gov/RDMS/MPEP/current#/current/d0e30961.html.
31 나흥렬.송명원.박영택(2019). 트리즈 발명원리의 산업 분야별 활용도 분석: 대한민국 발명특허대전 수상작 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 22(2), 28-35.
32 Swann, P.(1993). Inference from Mixed Bags: The Economic Value of Patent Counts, Innovation Counts and the Lake. London Business School: Mimeo
33 강유덕(2016). 노키아의 변화를 통해 본 핀란드 경제의 구조 변화. EU연구, 43, 163-198.
34 김은중 외(2013). 트리즈를 활용한 홍삼 제조과정에서의 문제 해결. 기술혁신학회지, 16(2), 408-423.
35 김중현.여형석.박영택(2017). 트리즈 도구별 활용도 분석: S사의 적용사례를 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 20(4), 3-11.
36 김준한.금영정(2019). 네트워크 분석 및 특허지표를 활용한 유망 제조-서비스 융합 기술 탐색: 자율주행차를 중심으로. 한국경영공학회지, 24(4), 15-37.
37 미국 회계감사원 General Accounting Office, GAO.(2013). Assessing factors that affect patent infringement litigation could help improve patent quality. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-465.
38 박병학.옥영석(2020). 혁신제품개발을 위한 프론트로딩 Tools 선정: 자동차부품 설계단계 중심으로. 한국경영공학회지, 25(1), 61-73.
39 박영택(2016). 창의발상론. 서울: 한국표준협회미디어.