1 |
Hodson, D. (1993). Re-thinking old ways: Towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science. Studies in Science Education, 22, 85-142.
DOI
|
2 |
Kahneman, D., Slovic, S. P., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
3 |
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1-48.
DOI
|
4 |
Klahr, D., Fay, A. L., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 111-146.
DOI
|
5 |
Kools, M., Van de Wiel, M. W., Ruiter, R. A., & Kok, G. (2006). Pictures and text in instructions for medical devices: Effects on recall and actual performance. Patient Education and Counseling, 64(1-3), 104-111.
DOI
|
6 |
Lehman, J. R. (1990). Students' verbal interactions during chemistry laboratories. School Science and Mathematics, 90(2), 142-150.
DOI
|
7 |
Johnstone, A. H. (1997). Chemistry teaching-science or alchemy? Journal of Chemical Education, 74(3), 262-268.
DOI
|
8 |
Baker, L. M., & Dunbar, K. (2000). Experimental design heuristics for scientific discovery: The use of "baseline" and "known standard" controls. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53(3), 335-349.
DOI
|
9 |
노태희, 김민영, 최숙영, 강석진(2008). 과학 실험 보고서를 이용한 불일치 사례에 대한 학생들의 반응 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 633-640.
|
10 |
김성운(2021). 과학 실험 활동 중 도구와의 상호작용에서 나타나는 도구 어포던스: 전자석 만들기를 중심으로. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 11(1), 131-148.
|
11 |
양일호, 김석민, 조현준(2007). 초.중등학교 과학 실험수업의 유형 분석. 한국교육과학회지, 27(3), 235-241.
|
12 |
조헌국, 송진웅(2011). 불일치 상황에서 나타나는 초등학생들의 관찰 유형과 학습자의 과학의 관점이 관찰 활동에 미치는 효과 분석. 초등과학교육, 30(4), 405-414.
|
13 |
Abrahams, I., & Millar, R. (2008). Does practical work really work? A study of the effectiveness of practical work as a teaching and learning method in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1945-1969.
DOI
|
14 |
Bujak, K. R. (2014). Transitional embedded instructions for manipulating physical objects. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
|
15 |
Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: Online creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
|
16 |
Fonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B., & Grobe, S. J. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 430-441.
DOI
|
17 |
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Why heuristics work. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(1), 20-29.
DOI
|
18 |
Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159-182). London: Routledge.
|
19 |
Graulich, N., Hopf, H., & Schreiner, P. R. (2010). Heuristic thinking makes a chemistsmart. Chemical Society Reviews, 39(5), 1503-1512.
DOI
|
20 |
Dunbar, K. (1999). The scientist in vivo: How scientists think and reason in the laboratory. In L. Magnani, N. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 89-98). New York: Plenum.
|
21 |
Hogstrom, P., Ottander, C., & Benckert, S. (2010). Lab work and learning in secondary school chemistry: The importance of teacher and student interaction. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 505-523.
DOI
|
22 |
Kane, J. E., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Heuristics and biases that help and hinder scientists: Toward a psychology of scientific judgment and decision making. In G. J. Feist, & M. E. Goreman (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of science (pp. 437-465). New York: Springer.
|
23 |
Knoblich, G., Ollinger, M., & Spivey, M. J. (2005). Tracking the eye to obtain insight into insight problem solving. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 355-375). Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
|
24 |
Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper Prepared for the Committee: High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC: University of York.
|
25 |
김천웅, 정정인(2019). 영재학생들의 지식수준에 따른 과학적 문제해결 전략 분석. 초등과학교육, 38(1), 73-86.
|
26 |
임청환, 임귀숙(2011). 초등 과학 영재의 과학 문제 해결과정 분석. 초등과학교육, 30(2), 213-231.
|
27 |
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
DOI
|
28 |
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
DOI
|
29 |
Osborne, J. (1993). Alternatives to practical work. School Science Review, 75(271), 117-123.
|